Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations

Feed production is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy production and demands large arable and pasture acreage. This study analysed how regional conditions influence GHG emissions of dairy feed rations in a life cycle perspective, that is the carbon footprint (CF) and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Henriksson, C. Cederberg, C. Swensson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731114000627
_version_ 1818641118271635456
author M. Henriksson
C. Cederberg
C. Swensson
author_facet M. Henriksson
C. Cederberg
C. Swensson
author_sort M. Henriksson
collection DOAJ
description Feed production is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy production and demands large arable and pasture acreage. This study analysed how regional conditions influence GHG emissions of dairy feed rations in a life cycle perspective, that is the carbon footprint (CF) and the land area required. Factors assessed included regional climate variations, grass/clover silage nutrient quality, feedstuff availability, crop yield and feed losses. Using the Nordic feed evaluation model NorFor, rations were optimised for different phases of lactation, dry and growing periods for older cows, first calvers and heifers by regional feed advisors and combined to annual herd rations. Feed production data at farm level were based on national statistics and studies. CF estimates followed standards for life cycle assessment and used emissions factors provided by IPCC. The functional unit was ‘feed consumption to produce 1 kg energy corrected milk (ECM) from a cow with annual milk yield of 9 900 kg ECM including replacement animals and feed losses’. Feed ration CF varied from 417 to 531 g CO2 e/kg ECM. Grass/clover silage contributed more than 50% of total GHG emissions. Use of higher quality silage increased ration CF by up to 5% as a result of an additional cut and increased rates of synthetic N-fertiliser. Domestically produced horse bean (Vicia faba), by-products from the sugar industry and maize silage were included in the rations with the lowest CF, but horse bean significantly increased ration land requirement. Rations required between 1.4 to 2 m2 cropland and 0.1 to 0.2 m2/kg semi-natural grassland per kg ECM and year. Higher yield levels reduced ration total CF. Inclusion of GHG emissions from land use change associated with Brazilian soya feed significantly increased ration CF. Ration CF and land use depended on ration composition, which was highly influenced by the regional availability and production of feedstuffs. The impact of individual feedstuffs on ration CF varies due to, for example, cultivation practices and climate conditions and feedstuffs should therefore be assessed in a ration and regional perspective before being used to decrease milk CF. Land use efficiency should be considered together with ration CF, as these can generate goal conflicts.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:22:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a38abd4387e47168138cc48599e3bbf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:22:05Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-3a38abd4387e47168138cc48599e3bbf2022-12-21T22:12:09ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112014-01-018813291338Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variationsM. Henriksson0C. Cederberg1C. Swensson2Department of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 86, SE-23053 Alnarp, SwedenSwedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 5401, SE-40229 Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 86, SE-23053 Alnarp, SwedenFeed production is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy production and demands large arable and pasture acreage. This study analysed how regional conditions influence GHG emissions of dairy feed rations in a life cycle perspective, that is the carbon footprint (CF) and the land area required. Factors assessed included regional climate variations, grass/clover silage nutrient quality, feedstuff availability, crop yield and feed losses. Using the Nordic feed evaluation model NorFor, rations were optimised for different phases of lactation, dry and growing periods for older cows, first calvers and heifers by regional feed advisors and combined to annual herd rations. Feed production data at farm level were based on national statistics and studies. CF estimates followed standards for life cycle assessment and used emissions factors provided by IPCC. The functional unit was ‘feed consumption to produce 1 kg energy corrected milk (ECM) from a cow with annual milk yield of 9 900 kg ECM including replacement animals and feed losses’. Feed ration CF varied from 417 to 531 g CO2 e/kg ECM. Grass/clover silage contributed more than 50% of total GHG emissions. Use of higher quality silage increased ration CF by up to 5% as a result of an additional cut and increased rates of synthetic N-fertiliser. Domestically produced horse bean (Vicia faba), by-products from the sugar industry and maize silage were included in the rations with the lowest CF, but horse bean significantly increased ration land requirement. Rations required between 1.4 to 2 m2 cropland and 0.1 to 0.2 m2/kg semi-natural grassland per kg ECM and year. Higher yield levels reduced ration total CF. Inclusion of GHG emissions from land use change associated with Brazilian soya feed significantly increased ration CF. Ration CF and land use depended on ration composition, which was highly influenced by the regional availability and production of feedstuffs. The impact of individual feedstuffs on ration CF varies due to, for example, cultivation practices and climate conditions and feedstuffs should therefore be assessed in a ration and regional perspective before being used to decrease milk CF. Land use efficiency should be considered together with ration CF, as these can generate goal conflicts.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731114000627greenhouse gas emissionsland uselife cycle assessmentration compositiondairy production
spellingShingle M. Henriksson
C. Cederberg
C. Swensson
Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations
Animal
greenhouse gas emissions
land use
life cycle assessment
ration composition
dairy production
title Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations
title_full Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations
title_fullStr Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations
title_full_unstemmed Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations
title_short Carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations: impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations
title_sort carbon footprint and land requirement for dairy herd rations impacts of feed production practices and regional climate variations
topic greenhouse gas emissions
land use
life cycle assessment
ration composition
dairy production
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731114000627
work_keys_str_mv AT mhenriksson carbonfootprintandlandrequirementfordairyherdrationsimpactsoffeedproductionpracticesandregionalclimatevariations
AT ccederberg carbonfootprintandlandrequirementfordairyherdrationsimpactsoffeedproductionpracticesandregionalclimatevariations
AT cswensson carbonfootprintandlandrequirementfordairyherdrationsimpactsoffeedproductionpracticesandregionalclimatevariations