Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi Arabia

Background: Despite strong evidence of the benefits of rapid sequence intubation in neonates, it is still infrequently utilized in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), contributing to avoidable pain and secondary procedure-related physiological disturbances. Objectives: The primary objective of thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafat Mosalli, Lana Shaiba, Khalid AlFaleh, Bosco Paes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2012;volume=6;issue=4;spage=385;epage=392;aulast=Mosalli
_version_ 1811309176738021376
author Rafat Mosalli
Lana Shaiba
Khalid AlFaleh
Bosco Paes
author_facet Rafat Mosalli
Lana Shaiba
Khalid AlFaleh
Bosco Paes
author_sort Rafat Mosalli
collection DOAJ
description Background: Despite strong evidence of the benefits of rapid sequence intubation in neonates, it is still infrequently utilized in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), contributing to avoidable pain and secondary procedure-related physiological disturbances. Objectives: The primary objective of this cross-sectional survey was to assess the practice of premedication and regimens commonly used before elective endotracheal intubation in NICUs in Saudi Arabia. The secondary aim was to explore neonatal physicians′ attitudes regarding this intervention in institutions across Saudi Arabia. Methods: A web-based, structured questionnaire was distributed by the Department of Pediatrics, Umm Al Qura University, Mecca, to neonatal physicians and consultants of 10 NICUs across the country by E-mail. Responses were tabulated and descriptive statistics were conducted on the variables extracted. Results: 85% responded to the survey. Although 70% believed it was essential to routinely use premedication for all elective intubations, only 41% implemented this strategy. 60% cited fear of potential side effects for avoiding premedication and 40% indicated that the procedure could be executed more rapidly without drug therapy. Treatment regimens varied widely among respondents. Conclusion: Rates of premedication use prior to non-emergent neonatal intubation are suboptimal. Flawed information and lack of unified unit policies hampered effective implementation. Evidence-based guidelines may influence country-wide adoption of this practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:37:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a3ee9b43f63479e844121c8b47de902
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-354X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:37:42Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-3a3ee9b43f63479e844121c8b47de9022022-12-22T02:52:02ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X2012-01-016438539210.4103/1658-354X.105878Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi ArabiaRafat MosalliLana ShaibaKhalid AlFalehBosco PaesBackground: Despite strong evidence of the benefits of rapid sequence intubation in neonates, it is still infrequently utilized in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), contributing to avoidable pain and secondary procedure-related physiological disturbances. Objectives: The primary objective of this cross-sectional survey was to assess the practice of premedication and regimens commonly used before elective endotracheal intubation in NICUs in Saudi Arabia. The secondary aim was to explore neonatal physicians′ attitudes regarding this intervention in institutions across Saudi Arabia. Methods: A web-based, structured questionnaire was distributed by the Department of Pediatrics, Umm Al Qura University, Mecca, to neonatal physicians and consultants of 10 NICUs across the country by E-mail. Responses were tabulated and descriptive statistics were conducted on the variables extracted. Results: 85% responded to the survey. Although 70% believed it was essential to routinely use premedication for all elective intubations, only 41% implemented this strategy. 60% cited fear of potential side effects for avoiding premedication and 40% indicated that the procedure could be executed more rapidly without drug therapy. Treatment regimens varied widely among respondents. Conclusion: Rates of premedication use prior to non-emergent neonatal intubation are suboptimal. Flawed information and lack of unified unit policies hampered effective implementation. Evidence-based guidelines may influence country-wide adoption of this practice.http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2012;volume=6;issue=4;spage=385;epage=392;aulast=MosalliEndotracheal intubationneonatepremedicationsedation
spellingShingle Rafat Mosalli
Lana Shaiba
Khalid AlFaleh
Bosco Paes
Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Endotracheal intubation
neonate
premedication
sedation
title Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi Arabia
title_full Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi Arabia
title_short Premedication for neonatal intubation: Current practice in Saudi Arabia
title_sort premedication for neonatal intubation current practice in saudi arabia
topic Endotracheal intubation
neonate
premedication
sedation
url http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2012;volume=6;issue=4;spage=385;epage=392;aulast=Mosalli
work_keys_str_mv AT rafatmosalli premedicationforneonatalintubationcurrentpracticeinsaudiarabia
AT lanashaiba premedicationforneonatalintubationcurrentpracticeinsaudiarabia
AT khalidalfaleh premedicationforneonatalintubationcurrentpracticeinsaudiarabia
AT boscopaes premedicationforneonatalintubationcurrentpracticeinsaudiarabia