A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central Queensland

Australia has a very high rate of dog ownership, which in some circumstances may lead to exposure to zoonotic parasitic diseases from those companion animals. Domestic dog faecal samples (n = 300) were collected from public spaces and private property in the greater Rockhampton (Central Queensland)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simone Gillespie, Richard S. Bradbury
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-11-01
Series:Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/2/4/60
_version_ 1811184760356077568
author Simone Gillespie
Richard S. Bradbury
author_facet Simone Gillespie
Richard S. Bradbury
author_sort Simone Gillespie
collection DOAJ
description Australia has a very high rate of dog ownership, which in some circumstances may lead to exposure to zoonotic parasitic diseases from those companion animals. Domestic dog faecal samples (n = 300) were collected from public spaces and private property in the greater Rockhampton (Central Queensland) region and tested for intestinal helminths and protozoa by direct microscopy, two flotation methods and a modified acid-fast stain for cryptosporidia. Intestinal parasites detected included hookworms (25%), Cystoisospora ohioensis complex (9%), Blastocystis hominis (3%), Giardia duodenalis (3%), Spirometra erinacei (1%) and Toxocara canis (1%), Sarcocystis spp. (2%), Cryptosporidium spp. (2%) and Cystoisospora canis (1%). One infection each with Trichuris vulpis, Dipylidium caninum and a protozoa belonging to the Entamoeba histolytica complex were identified. Sheather’s sucrose centrifugal flotation was more sensitive than saturated salt passive flotation, but no single test detected all cases of parasitic infection identified. The test methodologies employed are poor at recovering larva of Strongyloides stercoralis, Aleurostrongylus abstrussis and eggs of cestodes such as Echinococcus granulosis, so the potential presence of these parasites in Central Queensland domestic dogs cannot be excluded by this survey alone.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:17:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a53f84363814a2c8417fd1b1ae3f00d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2414-6366
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:17:54Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
spelling doaj.art-3a53f84363814a2c8417fd1b1ae3f00d2022-12-22T04:22:19ZengMDPI AGTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease2414-63662017-11-01246010.3390/tropicalmed2040060tropicalmed2040060A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central QueenslandSimone Gillespie0Richard S. Bradbury1School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, QSD 4702, AustraliaSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, QSD 4702, AustraliaAustralia has a very high rate of dog ownership, which in some circumstances may lead to exposure to zoonotic parasitic diseases from those companion animals. Domestic dog faecal samples (n = 300) were collected from public spaces and private property in the greater Rockhampton (Central Queensland) region and tested for intestinal helminths and protozoa by direct microscopy, two flotation methods and a modified acid-fast stain for cryptosporidia. Intestinal parasites detected included hookworms (25%), Cystoisospora ohioensis complex (9%), Blastocystis hominis (3%), Giardia duodenalis (3%), Spirometra erinacei (1%) and Toxocara canis (1%), Sarcocystis spp. (2%), Cryptosporidium spp. (2%) and Cystoisospora canis (1%). One infection each with Trichuris vulpis, Dipylidium caninum and a protozoa belonging to the Entamoeba histolytica complex were identified. Sheather’s sucrose centrifugal flotation was more sensitive than saturated salt passive flotation, but no single test detected all cases of parasitic infection identified. The test methodologies employed are poor at recovering larva of Strongyloides stercoralis, Aleurostrongylus abstrussis and eggs of cestodes such as Echinococcus granulosis, so the potential presence of these parasites in Central Queensland domestic dogs cannot be excluded by this survey alone.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/2/4/60dogscaninedomesticparasiteszoonoseshookwormQueenslandAustralia
spellingShingle Simone Gillespie
Richard S. Bradbury
A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central Queensland
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
dogs
canine
domestic
parasites
zoonoses
hookworm
Queensland
Australia
title A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central Queensland
title_full A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central Queensland
title_fullStr A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central Queensland
title_full_unstemmed A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central Queensland
title_short A Survey of Intestinal Parasites of Domestic Dogs in Central Queensland
title_sort survey of intestinal parasites of domestic dogs in central queensland
topic dogs
canine
domestic
parasites
zoonoses
hookworm
Queensland
Australia
url https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/2/4/60
work_keys_str_mv AT simonegillespie asurveyofintestinalparasitesofdomesticdogsincentralqueensland
AT richardsbradbury asurveyofintestinalparasitesofdomesticdogsincentralqueensland
AT simonegillespie surveyofintestinalparasitesofdomesticdogsincentralqueensland
AT richardsbradbury surveyofintestinalparasitesofdomesticdogsincentralqueensland