To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
Introduction: Awake fiberoptic intubation using local anaesthetics is the most dependable procedure to secure a difficult airway. It is electively done under various techniques of local anaesthesia which include administration of local anaesthetic via nebulisation, airway blocks and spray as you go...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11067/29241_230118_29241_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(PB_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG_OM)_PN(AP).pdf |
_version_ | 1818927782690816000 |
---|---|
author | Harpreet Kaur Ranjana Khetarpal Veena Chatrath Harkomal Kaur Piyush Khanna |
author_facet | Harpreet Kaur Ranjana Khetarpal Veena Chatrath Harkomal Kaur Piyush Khanna |
author_sort | Harpreet Kaur |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: Awake fiberoptic intubation using local anaesthetics is the most dependable procedure to secure a difficult airway. It is electively done under various techniques of local anaesthesia which include administration of local anaesthetic via nebulisation, airway blocks and spray as you go with or without sedation. Aim: To compare the efficacy of nebulisation with 4% lignocaine versus spray as you go technique for awake fiberoptic intubation. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-III were randomly divided into two groups (group N and group S). Patients in group N were nebulised with 4mL of 4% lignocaine while group S patients received four aliquots of 1mL 4% lignocaine through the working channel of the fiberoptic bronchoscope. The patients were compared for haemodynamic parameters, intubating conditions, intubation attempts, time taken for intubation and patient satisfaction score. The results were statistically analysed using SPSS version 22.0 software and compared. Results: On comparing the intubating conditions, the patients in group S showed better intubation score than the patients in group N (p-value <0.004). The time taken for intubation was lesser (4.56±0.85 minutes in group S and 4.0±0.45 minutes in group N) and the patient satisfaction score was also better in the spray as you go group. Conclusion: Spray as you go technique offers more effective local anaesthesia and better patient satisfaction as compared to nebulisation for awake fiberoptic intubation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:18:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3a54131462634ea1990dcee5c217ce34 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2249-782X 0973-709X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:18:29Z |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
spelling | doaj.art-3a54131462634ea1990dcee5c217ce342022-12-21T19:55:16ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2018-01-01121UC01UC0410.7860/JCDR/2018/29241.11067To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic IntubationHarpreet Kaur0Ranjana Khetarpal1Veena Chatrath2Harkomal Kaur3Piyush Khanna4Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, GMC Amritsar BFUHS Faridkot, Amritsar, Punjab, India.Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, GMC Amritsar BFUHS Faridkot, Amritsar, Punjab, India.Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesia, GMC Amritsar BFUHS Faridkot, Amritsar, Punjab, India.Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, GMC Amritsar BFUHS Faridkot, Amritsar, Punjab, India.Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, GMC Amritsar BFUHS Faridkot, Amritsar, Punjab, India.Introduction: Awake fiberoptic intubation using local anaesthetics is the most dependable procedure to secure a difficult airway. It is electively done under various techniques of local anaesthesia which include administration of local anaesthetic via nebulisation, airway blocks and spray as you go with or without sedation. Aim: To compare the efficacy of nebulisation with 4% lignocaine versus spray as you go technique for awake fiberoptic intubation. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-III were randomly divided into two groups (group N and group S). Patients in group N were nebulised with 4mL of 4% lignocaine while group S patients received four aliquots of 1mL 4% lignocaine through the working channel of the fiberoptic bronchoscope. The patients were compared for haemodynamic parameters, intubating conditions, intubation attempts, time taken for intubation and patient satisfaction score. The results were statistically analysed using SPSS version 22.0 software and compared. Results: On comparing the intubating conditions, the patients in group S showed better intubation score than the patients in group N (p-value <0.004). The time taken for intubation was lesser (4.56±0.85 minutes in group S and 4.0±0.45 minutes in group N) and the patient satisfaction score was also better in the spray as you go group. Conclusion: Spray as you go technique offers more effective local anaesthesia and better patient satisfaction as compared to nebulisation for awake fiberoptic intubation.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11067/29241_230118_29241_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(PB_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG_OM)_PN(AP).pdfanaesthesiabronchoscopyfiberoptic technologyintubationlignocainelocalpatient satisfaction |
spellingShingle | Harpreet Kaur Ranjana Khetarpal Veena Chatrath Harkomal Kaur Piyush Khanna To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research anaesthesia bronchoscopy fiberoptic technology intubation lignocaine local patient satisfaction |
title | To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation |
title_full | To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation |
title_fullStr | To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation |
title_full_unstemmed | To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation |
title_short | To Compare the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Administration via Spray as you Go Technique and Ultrasonic Nebulisation for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation |
title_sort | to compare the efficacy of local anaesthetic administration via spray as you go technique and ultrasonic nebulisation for awake fiberoptic intubation |
topic | anaesthesia bronchoscopy fiberoptic technology intubation lignocaine local patient satisfaction |
url | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11067/29241_230118_29241_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(PB_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG_OM)_PN(AP).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harpreetkaur tocomparetheefficacyoflocalanaestheticadministrationviasprayasyougotechniqueandultrasonicnebulisationforawakefiberopticintubation AT ranjanakhetarpal tocomparetheefficacyoflocalanaestheticadministrationviasprayasyougotechniqueandultrasonicnebulisationforawakefiberopticintubation AT veenachatrath tocomparetheefficacyoflocalanaestheticadministrationviasprayasyougotechniqueandultrasonicnebulisationforawakefiberopticintubation AT harkomalkaur tocomparetheefficacyoflocalanaestheticadministrationviasprayasyougotechniqueandultrasonicnebulisationforawakefiberopticintubation AT piyushkhanna tocomparetheefficacyoflocalanaestheticadministrationviasprayasyougotechniqueandultrasonicnebulisationforawakefiberopticintubation |