The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservation

Ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata and Varecia rubra) are categorized as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, and genetic studies are needed for assessing the conservation value of captive populations. Using 280 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop sequences, we studied the genetic diversity and st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Vega, Jane Hopper, Andrew C. Kitchener, Jérôme Catinaud, Delphine Roullet, Eric Robsomanitrandrasana, Jack D. Hollister, Christian Roos, Tony King
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-09-01
Series:Oryx
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605322000643/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797690055024705536
author Rodrigo Vega
Jane Hopper
Andrew C. Kitchener
Jérôme Catinaud
Delphine Roullet
Eric Robsomanitrandrasana
Jack D. Hollister
Christian Roos
Tony King
author_facet Rodrigo Vega
Jane Hopper
Andrew C. Kitchener
Jérôme Catinaud
Delphine Roullet
Eric Robsomanitrandrasana
Jack D. Hollister
Christian Roos
Tony King
author_sort Rodrigo Vega
collection DOAJ
description Ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata and Varecia rubra) are categorized as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, and genetic studies are needed for assessing the conservation value of captive populations. Using 280 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop sequences, we studied the genetic diversity and structure of captive ruffed lemurs in Madagascar, Europe and North America. We found 10 new haplotypes: one from the European captive V. rubra population, three from captive V. variegata subcincta (one from Europe and two from Madagascar) and six from other captive V. variegata in Madagascar. We found low mtDNA genetic diversity in the European and North American captive populations of V. variegata. Several founder individuals shared the same mtDNA haplotype and therefore should not be assumed to be unrelated founders when making breeding recommendations. The captive population in Madagascar has high genetic diversity, including haplotypes not yet identified in wild populations. We determined the probable geographical provenance of founders of captive populations by comparison with previous studies; all reported haplotypes from captive ruffed lemurs were identical to or clustered with haplotypes from wild populations located north of the Mangoro River in Madagascar. Effective conservation strategies for wild populations, with potentially unidentified genetic diversity, should still be considered the priority for conserving ruffed lemurs. However, our results illustrate that the captive population in Madagascar has conservation value as a source of potential release stock for reintroduction or reinforcement projects and that cross-regional transfers within the global captive population could increase the genetic diversity and therefore the conservation value of each regional population.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:54:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a6bfc3687be4b2fa944be9bb6e328b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-6053
1365-3008
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:54:02Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Oryx
spelling doaj.art-3a6bfc3687be4b2fa944be9bb6e328b12023-09-08T07:26:54ZengCambridge University PressOryx0030-60531365-30082023-09-015764965810.1017/S0030605322000643The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservationRodrigo Vega0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4915-9840Jane Hopper1Andrew C. Kitchener2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-0827Jérôme Catinaud3Delphine Roullet4Eric Robsomanitrandrasana5Jack D. Hollister6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-5076Christian Roos7Tony King8https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-0134Section of Natural and Applied Sciences, School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, North Holmes Road, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 1QU, UKThe Aspinall Foundation, Port Lympne Wild Animal Park, Hythe, UKDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, UKParc des Félins, Lumigny-Nesles-Ormeaux, FranceParc Zoologique de Paris, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, FranceMinistry of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Antananarivo, MadagascarSection of Natural and Applied Sciences, School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, North Holmes Road, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 1QU, UKGerman Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, GermanyThe Aspinall Foundation, Port Lympne Wild Animal Park, Hythe, UKRuffed lemurs (Varecia variegata and Varecia rubra) are categorized as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, and genetic studies are needed for assessing the conservation value of captive populations. Using 280 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop sequences, we studied the genetic diversity and structure of captive ruffed lemurs in Madagascar, Europe and North America. We found 10 new haplotypes: one from the European captive V. rubra population, three from captive V. variegata subcincta (one from Europe and two from Madagascar) and six from other captive V. variegata in Madagascar. We found low mtDNA genetic diversity in the European and North American captive populations of V. variegata. Several founder individuals shared the same mtDNA haplotype and therefore should not be assumed to be unrelated founders when making breeding recommendations. The captive population in Madagascar has high genetic diversity, including haplotypes not yet identified in wild populations. We determined the probable geographical provenance of founders of captive populations by comparison with previous studies; all reported haplotypes from captive ruffed lemurs were identical to or clustered with haplotypes from wild populations located north of the Mangoro River in Madagascar. Effective conservation strategies for wild populations, with potentially unidentified genetic diversity, should still be considered the priority for conserving ruffed lemurs. However, our results illustrate that the captive population in Madagascar has conservation value as a source of potential release stock for reintroduction or reinforcement projects and that cross-regional transfers within the global captive population could increase the genetic diversity and therefore the conservation value of each regional population.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605322000643/type/journal_articleBiodiversityconservationgenetic diversityLemuridaeMadagascarprimates
spellingShingle Rodrigo Vega
Jane Hopper
Andrew C. Kitchener
Jérôme Catinaud
Delphine Roullet
Eric Robsomanitrandrasana
Jack D. Hollister
Christian Roos
Tony King
The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservation
Oryx
Biodiversity
conservation
genetic diversity
Lemuridae
Madagascar
primates
title The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservation
title_full The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservation
title_fullStr The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservation
title_full_unstemmed The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservation
title_short The mitochondrial DNA diversity of captive ruffed lemurs (Varecia spp.): implications for conservation
title_sort mitochondrial dna diversity of captive ruffed lemurs varecia spp implications for conservation
topic Biodiversity
conservation
genetic diversity
Lemuridae
Madagascar
primates
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0030605322000643/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigovega themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT janehopper themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT andrewckitchener themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT jeromecatinaud themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT delphineroullet themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT ericrobsomanitrandrasana themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT jackdhollister themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT christianroos themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT tonyking themitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT rodrigovega mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT janehopper mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT andrewckitchener mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT jeromecatinaud mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT delphineroullet mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT ericrobsomanitrandrasana mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT jackdhollister mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT christianroos mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation
AT tonyking mitochondrialdnadiversityofcaptiveruffedlemursvareciasppimplicationsforconservation