Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.

In human applied physiology studies, the amplitude of recorded muscle electromyographic activity (EMG) is often normalized to maximal EMG recorded during a maximal voluntary contraction. When maximal contractions cannot be reliably obtained (e.g. in people with muscle paralysis, anterior cruciate li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanna Diong, Kenzo C Kishimoto, Jane E Butler, Martin E Héroux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277947
_version_ 1797959123969507328
author Joanna Diong
Kenzo C Kishimoto
Jane E Butler
Martin E Héroux
author_facet Joanna Diong
Kenzo C Kishimoto
Jane E Butler
Martin E Héroux
author_sort Joanna Diong
collection DOAJ
description In human applied physiology studies, the amplitude of recorded muscle electromyographic activity (EMG) is often normalized to maximal EMG recorded during a maximal voluntary contraction. When maximal contractions cannot be reliably obtained (e.g. in people with muscle paralysis, anterior cruciate ligament injury, or arthritis), EMG is sometimes normalized to the maximal compound muscle action potiential evoked by stimulation, the Mmax. However, it is not known how these two methods of normalization affect the conclusions and comparability of studies. To address this limitation, we investigated the relationship between voluntary muscle activation and EMG normalized either to maximal EMG or to Mmax. Twenty-five able-bodied adults performed voluntary isometric ankle plantarflexion contractions to a range of percentages of maximal voluntary torque. Ankle torque, plantarflexor muscle EMG, and voluntary muscle activation measured by twitch interpolation were recorded. EMG recorded at each contraction intensity was normalized to maximal EMG or to Mmax for each plantarflexor muscle, and the relationship between the two normalization approaches quantified. A slope >1 indicated EMG amplitude normalized to maximal EMG (vertical axis) was greater than EMG normalized to Mmax (horizontal axis). Mean estimates of the slopes were large and had moderate precision: soleus 8.7 (95% CI 6.9 to 11.0), medial gastrocnemius 13.4 (10.5 to 17.0), lateral gastrocnemius 11.4 (9.4 to 14.0). This indicates EMG normalized to Mmax is approximately eleven times smaller than EMG normalized to maximal EMG. Normalization to maximal EMG gave closer approximations to the level of voluntary muscle activation assessed by twitch interpolation.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T00:28:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a737f35c13b44718140540886ace756
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T00:28:11Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-3a737f35c13b44718140540886ace7562023-01-08T05:31:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711e027794710.1371/journal.pone.0277947Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.Joanna DiongKenzo C KishimotoJane E ButlerMartin E HérouxIn human applied physiology studies, the amplitude of recorded muscle electromyographic activity (EMG) is often normalized to maximal EMG recorded during a maximal voluntary contraction. When maximal contractions cannot be reliably obtained (e.g. in people with muscle paralysis, anterior cruciate ligament injury, or arthritis), EMG is sometimes normalized to the maximal compound muscle action potiential evoked by stimulation, the Mmax. However, it is not known how these two methods of normalization affect the conclusions and comparability of studies. To address this limitation, we investigated the relationship between voluntary muscle activation and EMG normalized either to maximal EMG or to Mmax. Twenty-five able-bodied adults performed voluntary isometric ankle plantarflexion contractions to a range of percentages of maximal voluntary torque. Ankle torque, plantarflexor muscle EMG, and voluntary muscle activation measured by twitch interpolation were recorded. EMG recorded at each contraction intensity was normalized to maximal EMG or to Mmax for each plantarflexor muscle, and the relationship between the two normalization approaches quantified. A slope >1 indicated EMG amplitude normalized to maximal EMG (vertical axis) was greater than EMG normalized to Mmax (horizontal axis). Mean estimates of the slopes were large and had moderate precision: soleus 8.7 (95% CI 6.9 to 11.0), medial gastrocnemius 13.4 (10.5 to 17.0), lateral gastrocnemius 11.4 (9.4 to 14.0). This indicates EMG normalized to Mmax is approximately eleven times smaller than EMG normalized to maximal EMG. Normalization to maximal EMG gave closer approximations to the level of voluntary muscle activation assessed by twitch interpolation.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277947
spellingShingle Joanna Diong
Kenzo C Kishimoto
Jane E Butler
Martin E Héroux
Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.
PLoS ONE
title Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.
title_full Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.
title_fullStr Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.
title_full_unstemmed Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.
title_short Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.
title_sort muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity not to mmax better represents voluntary activation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277947
work_keys_str_mv AT joannadiong muscleelectromyographicactivitynormalizedtomaximalmuscleactivitynottommaxbetterrepresentsvoluntaryactivation
AT kenzockishimoto muscleelectromyographicactivitynormalizedtomaximalmuscleactivitynottommaxbetterrepresentsvoluntaryactivation
AT janeebutler muscleelectromyographicactivitynormalizedtomaximalmuscleactivitynottommaxbetterrepresentsvoluntaryactivation
AT martineheroux muscleelectromyographicactivitynormalizedtomaximalmuscleactivitynottommaxbetterrepresentsvoluntaryactivation