| Summary: | BackgroundThis study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA) and core needle biopsy (US-CNB) for detecting axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer.MethodsEligible studies and pertinent literature resources were identified in Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases using subject-specific keywords. Study outcomes were tested for heterogeneity, and meta-analyses were performed to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis was also performed.ResultsA total of 22 studies involving 3,548 patients were included to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of US-FNA and 11 studies involving 758 patients were included to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of US-CNB in identifying axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer. The accuracy of US-FNA in identifying suspicious axillary lymph nodes was as follows: overall sensitivity, 79% (95% CI: 73%–84%); global specificity, 96% (95% CI: 92%–98%); overall positive likelihood ratio, 18.55 (95% CI: 10.53–32.69); overall negative likelihood ratio, 0.22 (95% CI: 0.17–0.28); DOR, 71.68 (95% CI: 37.19–138.12); and the area under the SROC curve, 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). The accuracy of US-CNB in identifying suspicious axillary lymph nodes was as follows: overall sensitivity, 85% (95% CI: 81%–89%); global specificity, 93% (95% CI: 87%–96%); overall positive likelihood ratio, 11.88 (95% CI: 6.56–21.50); overall negative likelihood ratio, 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12–0.21); overall DOR, 66.83 (95% CI: 33.28–134.21), and the area under SROC curve 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.97).ConclusionsThe results indicate that both US-FNA and US-CNB have high accuracy for suspicious axillary lymph nodes.
|
|---|