The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique

In June 1999, the Basle Committee of Banking Supervisors issued a consultative paper proposing the introduction of a new framework for the capital adequacy assessment of internationally-active banks operating in the G10 area. The initiative reflected a desire to address some of the long-acknowledge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maximilian J.B. Hall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Economia civile 2012-04-01
Series:PSL Quarterly Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/9930
_version_ 1811172377054150656
author Maximilian J.B. Hall
author_facet Maximilian J.B. Hall
author_sort Maximilian J.B. Hall
collection DOAJ
description In June 1999, the Basle Committee of Banking Supervisors issued a consultative paper proposing the introduction of a new framework for the capital adequacy assessment of internationally-active banks operating in the G10 area. The initiative reflected a desire to address some of the long-acknowledged deficiencies in the current regime, operating under the guise of the Basle Capital Accord since 1988, and to accommodate recent market developments (especially in risk management) and financial innovations. This article critically analyses the new proposals, as amended in January 2001, providing a "cost-benefit" analysis of the proposed framework and assessing the extent to which the flaws in the current assessment regime would be overcome.   JEL Codes: G21, G28, F23
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:30:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a8a14b6c4934afc855db663e6a12f35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2037-3635
2037-3643
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:30:05Z
publishDate 2012-04-01
publisher Associazione Economia civile
record_format Article
series PSL Quarterly Review
spelling doaj.art-3a8a14b6c4934afc855db663e6a12f352023-02-03T16:48:05ZengAssociazione Economia civilePSL Quarterly Review2037-36352037-36432012-04-015421710.13133/2037-3643/9930The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critiqueMaximilian J.B. Hall In June 1999, the Basle Committee of Banking Supervisors issued a consultative paper proposing the introduction of a new framework for the capital adequacy assessment of internationally-active banks operating in the G10 area. The initiative reflected a desire to address some of the long-acknowledged deficiencies in the current regime, operating under the guise of the Basle Capital Accord since 1988, and to accommodate recent market developments (especially in risk management) and financial innovations. This article critically analyses the new proposals, as amended in January 2001, providing a "cost-benefit" analysis of the proposed framework and assessing the extent to which the flaws in the current assessment regime would be overcome.   JEL Codes: G21, G28, F23 https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/9930BankBanking
spellingShingle Maximilian J.B. Hall
The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique
PSL Quarterly Review
Bank
Banking
title The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique
title_full The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique
title_fullStr The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique
title_full_unstemmed The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique
title_short The basle Committee's proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework: a critique
title_sort basle committee s proposals for a new capital adequacy assessment framework a critique
topic Bank
Banking
url https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/9930
work_keys_str_mv AT maximilianjbhall thebaslecommitteesproposalsforanewcapitaladequacyassessmentframeworkacritique
AT maximilianjbhall baslecommitteesproposalsforanewcapitaladequacyassessmentframeworkacritique