Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational Models

We consider non-derivatives of the holophrastic type (holofrasemes), which are reduced to a generalized word-formation model «S1 + zhe/zh + S2». The relevance of the study is due to the noticeable productivity of this model in the informal segment of the Runet — a dynamically developing system that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. V. Shchenikova, E. A. Zhdanova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021-12-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3467
_version_ 1797245611003609088
author E. V. Shchenikova
E. A. Zhdanova
author_facet E. V. Shchenikova
E. A. Zhdanova
author_sort E. V. Shchenikova
collection DOAJ
description We consider non-derivatives of the holophrastic type (holofrasemes), which are reduced to a generalized word-formation model «S1 + zhe/zh + S2». The relevance of the study is due to the noticeable productivity of this model in the informal segment of the Runet — a dynamically developing system that clearly reflects many active processes in the Russian national language and is capable of influencing the speech practice of native speakers in other communicative environments. Various approaches to understanding the method of creating the considered non-derivatives are indicated, as well as to the interpretation of the term “holophrasis”. Particular attention is paid to the lexemes yazhemat and onizhedeti, that have become entrenched in the Internet discourse, which can be regarded as the conceptual and structural basis of the model under consideration. The novelty of the research is seen in the detailed typologization of holophrasemes — the model representatives on a number of structural and functional-semantic grounds. The types of such units are presented by objects and grounds of nomination, by the degree of connectivity of the components. Varieties of the generalized model are given, distinguished by the morphological (and in some cases, syntactic) expression of the producing units; groups of structural and semantic anomalies accompanying the creation of holophrastic derivatives are considered. The questions about the inclusion of holophrasemes in derivational processes as producing words, as well as about the morphemization of components like yazhe, tyzhe are touched upon.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:27:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a8ca9119289419d92d6ba708ea9e015
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:29:39Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj.art-3a8ca9119289419d92d6ba708ea9e0152024-03-25T14:31:07ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952021-12-0101213915810.24224/2227-1295-2021-12-139-1582081Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational ModelsE. V. Shchenikova0E. A. Zhdanova1National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny NovgorodNational Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny NovgorodWe consider non-derivatives of the holophrastic type (holofrasemes), which are reduced to a generalized word-formation model «S1 + zhe/zh + S2». The relevance of the study is due to the noticeable productivity of this model in the informal segment of the Runet — a dynamically developing system that clearly reflects many active processes in the Russian national language and is capable of influencing the speech practice of native speakers in other communicative environments. Various approaches to understanding the method of creating the considered non-derivatives are indicated, as well as to the interpretation of the term “holophrasis”. Particular attention is paid to the lexemes yazhemat and onizhedeti, that have become entrenched in the Internet discourse, which can be regarded as the conceptual and structural basis of the model under consideration. The novelty of the research is seen in the detailed typologization of holophrasemes — the model representatives on a number of structural and functional-semantic grounds. The types of such units are presented by objects and grounds of nomination, by the degree of connectivity of the components. Varieties of the generalized model are given, distinguished by the morphological (and in some cases, syntactic) expression of the producing units; groups of structural and semantic anomalies accompanying the creation of holophrastic derivatives are considered. The questions about the inclusion of holophrasemes in derivational processes as producing words, as well as about the morphemization of components like yazhe, tyzhe are touched upon.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3467word formationfusionholophrasislanguage of the internetinternet forumsblogs<i>yazhemat</i>
spellingShingle E. V. Shchenikova
E. A. Zhdanova
Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational Models
Научный диалог
word formation
fusion
holophrasis
language of the internet
internet forums
blogs
<i>yazhemat</i>
title Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational Models
title_full Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational Models
title_fullStr Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational Models
title_full_unstemmed Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational Models
title_short Holophrasemes with a Central Component ‘zhe’: Derivational Models
title_sort holophrasemes with a central component zhe derivational models
topic word formation
fusion
holophrasis
language of the internet
internet forums
blogs
<i>yazhemat</i>
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3467
work_keys_str_mv AT evshchenikova holophrasemeswithacentralcomponentzhederivationalmodels
AT eazhdanova holophrasemeswithacentralcomponentzhederivationalmodels