When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature
This metaphoric analysis of a quarter-million word corpus of an expert literature (conflict resolution and professional mediation) suggests certain implicit assumptions of the experts and gives us an alternate view of the structure of their thinking. Seven highly conventional metaphors are repeatedl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos
2009-04-01
|
| Series: | Ibérica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.aelfe.org/documents/11_17_Smith.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811336013549666304 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas H. Smith |
| author_facet | Thomas H. Smith |
| author_sort | Thomas H. Smith |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This metaphoric analysis of a quarter-million word corpus of an expert literature (conflict resolution and professional mediation) suggests certain implicit assumptions of the experts and gives us an alternate view of the structure of their thinking. Seven highly conventional metaphors are repeatedly used to frame descriptions and explanations, making a complex subject matter more accessible to learners. They have been reported widely in other literatures and genres and are not particular to the field of expertise covered. These metaphors were found in some instances to oversimplify and mislead, mitigated to a degree when combinations of metaphors reconstituted some of the necessary complexity. The seven principal metaphor source domains found are containers, objects, terrain, seeing/viewing, moving, journeying, and structuring. Evidence of frequent and diverse mappings argues that these are conceptual metaphors, revealing possible thinking patterns. The combining and alternating of metaphors in mutually complementary ways shows an interdependence among the seven metaphors. These naturally occurring conceptual groupings clarify and elaborate meaning in the texts in a way comparable to inheritance hierarchies. The discussion of the results focuses on ways these metaphors both help and hinder understanding of the field in question. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T17:33:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3aa1c3ef24034eb4a1f1cbdac58bbc43 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1139-7241 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T17:33:09Z |
| publishDate | 2009-04-01 |
| publisher | Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ibérica |
| spelling | doaj.art-3aa1c3ef24034eb4a1f1cbdac58bbc432022-12-22T02:37:30ZengAsociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines EspecíficosIbérica1139-72412009-04-0117175195When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literatureThomas H. SmithThis metaphoric analysis of a quarter-million word corpus of an expert literature (conflict resolution and professional mediation) suggests certain implicit assumptions of the experts and gives us an alternate view of the structure of their thinking. Seven highly conventional metaphors are repeatedly used to frame descriptions and explanations, making a complex subject matter more accessible to learners. They have been reported widely in other literatures and genres and are not particular to the field of expertise covered. These metaphors were found in some instances to oversimplify and mislead, mitigated to a degree when combinations of metaphors reconstituted some of the necessary complexity. The seven principal metaphor source domains found are containers, objects, terrain, seeing/viewing, moving, journeying, and structuring. Evidence of frequent and diverse mappings argues that these are conceptual metaphors, revealing possible thinking patterns. The combining and alternating of metaphors in mutually complementary ways shows an interdependence among the seven metaphors. These naturally occurring conceptual groupings clarify and elaborate meaning in the texts in a way comparable to inheritance hierarchies. The discussion of the results focuses on ways these metaphors both help and hinder understanding of the field in question.http://www.aelfe.org/documents/11_17_Smith.pdfconceptual metaphorexpert literaturecorpus analysisconflict resolution and mediation |
| spellingShingle | Thomas H. Smith When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature Ibérica conceptual metaphor expert literature corpus analysis conflict resolution and mediation |
| title | When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature |
| title_full | When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature |
| title_fullStr | When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature |
| title_full_unstemmed | When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature |
| title_short | When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature |
| title_sort | when experts educate what do their metaphors say complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature |
| topic | conceptual metaphor expert literature corpus analysis conflict resolution and mediation |
| url | http://www.aelfe.org/documents/11_17_Smith.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomashsmith whenexpertseducatewhatdotheirmetaphorssaycomplexmetaphorstructureintheprofessionalconflictresolutionliterature |