Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding
ABSTRACT The present study aimed to determine the optimum agricultural policy components for buffalo breeding respecting the welfare of breeders. The data used for the study was composed of microdata retrieved from buffalo breeders in Turkish provinces, where buffalo breeding is widespread. The data...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982020000100109&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1819260969374711808 |
---|---|
author | Yavuz Taşcioğlu Metin Göksel Akpinar Mevlüt Gül Bahri Karli Yalçin Bozkurt |
author_facet | Yavuz Taşcioğlu Metin Göksel Akpinar Mevlüt Gül Bahri Karli Yalçin Bozkurt |
author_sort | Yavuz Taşcioğlu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT The present study aimed to determine the optimum agricultural policy components for buffalo breeding respecting the welfare of breeders. The data used for the study was composed of microdata retrieved from buffalo breeders in Turkish provinces, where buffalo breeding is widespread. The data retrieved via face to face survey was analyzed and interpreted with descriptive statistics and Conjoint Analysis, which is one of the multivariate analysis techniques. In this study, we investigated and discussed the scope of supporting policies provided to buffalo breeders to promote buffalo breeding and to assure its sustainability. Besides, this research is a preliminary and innovative study that intended to focus on breeders' utility in the evaluation of supports provided to buffalo breeding. According to the findings, the most critical factor for buffalo breeders in terms of producer-oriented policy framework appeared as “subsidy in cash paid per head” (32.10%), which was followed by “investment support” with 21.25%. In addition to these tools, “marketing support” (16.51%), “product support” (16.18%), and “investment credit” (13.96%) appeared as essential and vital policy tools. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T19:34:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3accbf5ed99842208955ae40f9098606 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1806-9290 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T19:34:21Z |
publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
spelling | doaj.art-3accbf5ed99842208955ae40f90986062022-12-21T17:33:49ZengSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia1806-92902020-10-014910.37496/rbz4920200120Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breedingYavuz Taşcioğluhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8989-3145Metin Göksel Akpinarhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8167-073XMevlüt Gülhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-7228Bahri Karlihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-1781Yalçin Bozkurthttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-7900ABSTRACT The present study aimed to determine the optimum agricultural policy components for buffalo breeding respecting the welfare of breeders. The data used for the study was composed of microdata retrieved from buffalo breeders in Turkish provinces, where buffalo breeding is widespread. The data retrieved via face to face survey was analyzed and interpreted with descriptive statistics and Conjoint Analysis, which is one of the multivariate analysis techniques. In this study, we investigated and discussed the scope of supporting policies provided to buffalo breeders to promote buffalo breeding and to assure its sustainability. Besides, this research is a preliminary and innovative study that intended to focus on breeders' utility in the evaluation of supports provided to buffalo breeding. According to the findings, the most critical factor for buffalo breeders in terms of producer-oriented policy framework appeared as “subsidy in cash paid per head” (32.10%), which was followed by “investment support” with 21.25%. In addition to these tools, “marketing support” (16.51%), “product support” (16.18%), and “investment credit” (13.96%) appeared as essential and vital policy tools.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982020000100109&tlng=enbuffaloConjoint Analysispolicy preferenceTurkey |
spellingShingle | Yavuz Taşcioğlu Metin Göksel Akpinar Mevlüt Gül Bahri Karli Yalçin Bozkurt Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia buffalo Conjoint Analysis policy preference Turkey |
title | Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding |
title_full | Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding |
title_fullStr | Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding |
title_short | Determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding |
title_sort | determination of optimum agricultural policy for buffalo breeding |
topic | buffalo Conjoint Analysis policy preference Turkey |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982020000100109&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yavuztascioglu determinationofoptimumagriculturalpolicyforbuffalobreeding AT metingokselakpinar determinationofoptimumagriculturalpolicyforbuffalobreeding AT mevlutgul determinationofoptimumagriculturalpolicyforbuffalobreeding AT bahrikarli determinationofoptimumagriculturalpolicyforbuffalobreeding AT yalcinbozkurt determinationofoptimumagriculturalpolicyforbuffalobreeding |