The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of early APRV mode as a lung protective strategy compared to conventional methods with regard to ARDS development. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, non-blinded, single-center, superiority trial with two...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehtap Pehlivanlar Küçük, Çağatay Erman Öztürk, Nazan Köylü İlkaya, Ahmet Oğuzhan Küçük, Dursun Fırat Ergül, Fatma Ülger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001639
_version_ 1811236740055171072
author Mehtap Pehlivanlar Küçük
Çağatay Erman Öztürk
Nazan Köylü İlkaya
Ahmet Oğuzhan Küçük
Dursun Fırat Ergül
Fatma Ülger
author_facet Mehtap Pehlivanlar Küçük
Çağatay Erman Öztürk
Nazan Köylü İlkaya
Ahmet Oğuzhan Küçük
Dursun Fırat Ergül
Fatma Ülger
author_sort Mehtap Pehlivanlar Küçük
collection DOAJ
description Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of early APRV mode as a lung protective strategy compared to conventional methods with regard to ARDS development. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, non-blinded, single-center, superiority trial with two parallel groups and a primary endpoint of ARDS development. Patients under invasive mechanical ventilation who were not diagnosed with ARDS and had Lung Injury Prediction Score greater than 7 were included in the study. The patients were assigned to APRV and P-SIMV + PS mode groups. Results: Patients were treated with P-SIMV+PS or APRV mode; 33 (50.8%) and 32 (49.2%), respectively. The P/F ratio values were higher in the APRV group on day 3 (p = 0.032). The fraction of inspired oxygen value was lower in the APRV group at day 7 (p = 0.011).While 5 of the 33 patients (15.2%) in the P-SIMV+PS group developed ARDS, one out of the 32 patients (3.1%) in the APRV group developed ARDS during follow-up (p = 0.197). The groups didn’t differ in terms of vasopressor/inotrope requirement, successful extubation rates, and/or mortality rates (p = 1.000, p = 0.911, p = 0.705, respectively). Duration of intensive care unit stay was 8 (2–11) days in the APRV group and 13 (8–81) days in the P-SIMV+PS group (p = 0.019). Conclusions: The APRV mode can be used safely in selected groups of surgical and medical patients while preserving spontaneous respiration to a make benefit of its lung-protective effects. In comparison to the conventional mode, it is associated with improved oxygenation, higher mean airway pressures, and shorter intensive care unit stay. However, it does not reduce the sedation requirement, ARDS development, or mortality.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:13:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ace6b61927d4d43b92c0734d1200475
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0104-0014
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:13:20Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-3ace6b61927d4d43b92c0734d12004752022-12-22T03:33:30ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142022-01-017212936The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trialMehtap Pehlivanlar Küçük0Çağatay Erman Öztürk1Nazan Köylü İlkaya2Ahmet Oğuzhan Küçük3Dursun Fırat Ergül4Fatma Ülger5Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Chest Diseases, Trabzon, Turkey; Corresponding author.Health Sciences University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Intensive Care Medicine, Samsun, TurkeyGazi State Hospital, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun, TurkeyKaradeniz Technical University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Trabzon, TurkeyHitit University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Çorum, TurkeyOndokuz Mayıs University, Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun, TurkeyBackground and objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of early APRV mode as a lung protective strategy compared to conventional methods with regard to ARDS development. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, non-blinded, single-center, superiority trial with two parallel groups and a primary endpoint of ARDS development. Patients under invasive mechanical ventilation who were not diagnosed with ARDS and had Lung Injury Prediction Score greater than 7 were included in the study. The patients were assigned to APRV and P-SIMV + PS mode groups. Results: Patients were treated with P-SIMV+PS or APRV mode; 33 (50.8%) and 32 (49.2%), respectively. The P/F ratio values were higher in the APRV group on day 3 (p = 0.032). The fraction of inspired oxygen value was lower in the APRV group at day 7 (p = 0.011).While 5 of the 33 patients (15.2%) in the P-SIMV+PS group developed ARDS, one out of the 32 patients (3.1%) in the APRV group developed ARDS during follow-up (p = 0.197). The groups didn’t differ in terms of vasopressor/inotrope requirement, successful extubation rates, and/or mortality rates (p = 1.000, p = 0.911, p = 0.705, respectively). Duration of intensive care unit stay was 8 (2–11) days in the APRV group and 13 (8–81) days in the P-SIMV+PS group (p = 0.019). Conclusions: The APRV mode can be used safely in selected groups of surgical and medical patients while preserving spontaneous respiration to a make benefit of its lung-protective effects. In comparison to the conventional mode, it is associated with improved oxygenation, higher mean airway pressures, and shorter intensive care unit stay. However, it does not reduce the sedation requirement, ARDS development, or mortality.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001639Acute respiratory distress syndromeAPRV ventilation modeBi-level continuous positive airway pressure, intensive care unitVentilation modes
spellingShingle Mehtap Pehlivanlar Küçük
Çağatay Erman Öztürk
Nazan Köylü İlkaya
Ahmet Oğuzhan Küçük
Dursun Fırat Ergül
Fatma Ülger
The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
APRV ventilation mode
Bi-level continuous positive airway pressure, intensive care unit
Ventilation modes
title The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of preemptive airway pressure release ventilation on patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome a randomized controlled trial
topic Acute respiratory distress syndrome
APRV ventilation mode
Bi-level continuous positive airway pressure, intensive care unit
Ventilation modes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421001639
work_keys_str_mv AT mehtappehlivanlarkucuk theeffectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cagatayermanozturk theeffectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nazankoyluilkaya theeffectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahmetoguzhankucuk theeffectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dursunfıratergul theeffectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fatmaulger theeffectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mehtappehlivanlarkucuk effectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cagatayermanozturk effectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nazankoyluilkaya effectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahmetoguzhankucuk effectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dursunfıratergul effectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fatmaulger effectofpreemptiveairwaypressurereleaseventilationonpatientswithhighriskforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial