Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

IntroductionPersons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) can exhibit apparently antisocial behaviors. An example is their tendency to adopt utilitarian choices in sacrificial moral dilemmas, i.e. harmful actions to promote overall welfare. Moral cognition models interpret such ten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rea Antoniou, Tobias Hausermann, Alissa Bernstein Sideman, Kristina Celeste Fong, Patrick Callahan, Bruce L. Miller, Joel H. Kramer, Winston Chiong, Katherine P. Rankin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1197213/full
_version_ 1797783718111215616
author Rea Antoniou
Tobias Hausermann
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Kristina Celeste Fong
Patrick Callahan
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer
Winston Chiong
Katherine P. Rankin
Katherine P. Rankin
author_facet Rea Antoniou
Tobias Hausermann
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Kristina Celeste Fong
Patrick Callahan
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer
Winston Chiong
Katherine P. Rankin
Katherine P. Rankin
author_sort Rea Antoniou
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionPersons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) can exhibit apparently antisocial behaviors. An example is their tendency to adopt utilitarian choices in sacrificial moral dilemmas, i.e. harmful actions to promote overall welfare. Moral cognition models interpret such tendencies as deriving from a lack of emotional engagement and selective impairment in prosocial sentiments.MethodsWe applied a qualitative approach to test those theoretical assumptions and to further explore the emotional experiences and values of people with bvFTD while they contemplate moral scenarios. We conducted semistructured interviews with 14 participants: 7 persons with bvFTD and 7 older healthy controls. Transcripts were coded using ATLAS.ti 5.0.ResultsDuring the moral reasoning task, persons with bvFTD reported more positive emotions than negative and showed significantly less cognitive precision in their moral reasoning compared to controls. Persons with bvFTD also organized their choices predominantly around kindness and altruism, and their responses reflected higher rule compliance. Our study showed that bvFTD persons’ utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas did not arise from an emotionally disengaged or antisocial perspective. Instead, they were underpinned by positive emotionality and prosocial values.DiscussionThese findings enrich current understandings of moral cognition and highlight the importance of incorporating mixed methods approaches in dementia research that take into consideration the viewpoint of cognitively impaired individuals
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:29:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3ae510f523564ae9a58dad54be22b466
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:29:50Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-3ae510f523564ae9a58dad54be22b4662023-07-10T15:34:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952023-07-011410.3389/fneur.2023.11972131197213Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementiaRea Antoniou0Tobias Hausermann1Alissa Bernstein Sideman2Alissa Bernstein Sideman3Alissa Bernstein Sideman4Alissa Bernstein Sideman5Kristina Celeste Fong6Patrick Callahan7Bruce L. Miller8Bruce L. Miller9Joel H. Kramer10Joel H. Kramer11Winston Chiong12Katherine P. Rankin13Katherine P. Rankin14Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesGlobal Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesIntroductionPersons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) can exhibit apparently antisocial behaviors. An example is their tendency to adopt utilitarian choices in sacrificial moral dilemmas, i.e. harmful actions to promote overall welfare. Moral cognition models interpret such tendencies as deriving from a lack of emotional engagement and selective impairment in prosocial sentiments.MethodsWe applied a qualitative approach to test those theoretical assumptions and to further explore the emotional experiences and values of people with bvFTD while they contemplate moral scenarios. We conducted semistructured interviews with 14 participants: 7 persons with bvFTD and 7 older healthy controls. Transcripts were coded using ATLAS.ti 5.0.ResultsDuring the moral reasoning task, persons with bvFTD reported more positive emotions than negative and showed significantly less cognitive precision in their moral reasoning compared to controls. Persons with bvFTD also organized their choices predominantly around kindness and altruism, and their responses reflected higher rule compliance. Our study showed that bvFTD persons’ utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas did not arise from an emotionally disengaged or antisocial perspective. Instead, they were underpinned by positive emotionality and prosocial values.DiscussionThese findings enrich current understandings of moral cognition and highlight the importance of incorporating mixed methods approaches in dementia research that take into consideration the viewpoint of cognitively impaired individualshttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1197213/fullmoral reasoningbvFTDpositive emotionalitymixed method approachprosocial values
spellingShingle Rea Antoniou
Tobias Hausermann
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Alissa Bernstein Sideman
Kristina Celeste Fong
Patrick Callahan
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer
Winston Chiong
Katherine P. Rankin
Katherine P. Rankin
Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Frontiers in Neurology
moral reasoning
bvFTD
positive emotionality
mixed method approach
prosocial values
title Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
title_full Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
title_fullStr Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
title_full_unstemmed Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
title_short Moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
title_sort moral reasoning through the eyes of persons with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
topic moral reasoning
bvFTD
positive emotionality
mixed method approach
prosocial values
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1197213/full
work_keys_str_mv AT reaantoniou moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT tobiashausermann moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT alissabernsteinsideman moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT alissabernsteinsideman moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT alissabernsteinsideman moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT alissabernsteinsideman moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT kristinacelestefong moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT patrickcallahan moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT brucelmiller moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT brucelmiller moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT joelhkramer moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT joelhkramer moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT winstonchiong moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT katherineprankin moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia
AT katherineprankin moralreasoningthroughtheeyesofpersonswithbehavioralvariantfrontotemporaldementia