THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATION

Traditional arbitration is not seen as exhaustive anymore and faces several shortcomings in dealing with international commercial disputes. Therefore, the need for a more effective arbitration method to complement the existing traditional method of arbitration in handling domestic and international...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamad Fateh Labanieh, Mohammad Azam Hussain, Nazli Mahdzir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of International Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/15395
_version_ 1811326812690579456
author Mohamad Fateh Labanieh
Mohammad Azam Hussain
Nazli Mahdzir
author_facet Mohamad Fateh Labanieh
Mohammad Azam Hussain
Nazli Mahdzir
author_sort Mohamad Fateh Labanieh
collection DOAJ
description Traditional arbitration is not seen as exhaustive anymore and faces several shortcomings in dealing with international commercial disputes. Therefore, the need for a more effective arbitration method to complement the existing traditional method of arbitration in handling domestic and international commercial disputes becomes a pressing necessity. Electronic arbitration (hereinafter referred to as “e-arbitration”) might be the initial step to accomplish this aspired goal. However, e-arbitration has not been regulated yet at the international level. By using doctrinal legal research methodology, this contribution endeavours to examine the legal capacity of international conventions and laws to legalise e-arbitration. Both primary and secondary data are analytically and critically evaluated using content analysis method. It is discovered that the New York Convention 1958 is not legally sufficient to recognise e-arbitration because it was enacted before the emergence of current modern technologies and communication. However, the UNCITRAL Model Laws, such as Electronic Commerce 1996, Electronic Signatures 2001, Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985, and the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts 2005, may play a considerable role in recognising e-arbitration in the context of New York Convention 1958. To summarise, several legal gaps need to be addressed; therefore, the study recommends that the international arbitration communities, such as UNCITRAL, should develop an international legal framework to directly and precisely regulate e-arbitration to enhance legal validity of e-arbitration and to provide international harmonisation and uniformity. 
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:56:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3af5ccd43f1c44849f63667b6655d64d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1823-691X
2289-666X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:56:00Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher UUM Press
record_format Article
series Journal of International Studies
spelling doaj.art-3af5ccd43f1c44849f63667b6655d64d2022-12-22T02:42:26ZengUUM PressJournal of International Studies1823-691X2289-666X2021-12-0117THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATIONMohamad Fateh Labanieh0Mohammad Azam Hussain1Nazli Mahdzir2School of Law, Universiti Utara MalaysiaSchool of Law, Universiti Utara MalaysiaSchool of Law, Universiti Utara Malaysia Traditional arbitration is not seen as exhaustive anymore and faces several shortcomings in dealing with international commercial disputes. Therefore, the need for a more effective arbitration method to complement the existing traditional method of arbitration in handling domestic and international commercial disputes becomes a pressing necessity. Electronic arbitration (hereinafter referred to as “e-arbitration”) might be the initial step to accomplish this aspired goal. However, e-arbitration has not been regulated yet at the international level. By using doctrinal legal research methodology, this contribution endeavours to examine the legal capacity of international conventions and laws to legalise e-arbitration. Both primary and secondary data are analytically and critically evaluated using content analysis method. It is discovered that the New York Convention 1958 is not legally sufficient to recognise e-arbitration because it was enacted before the emergence of current modern technologies and communication. However, the UNCITRAL Model Laws, such as Electronic Commerce 1996, Electronic Signatures 2001, Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985, and the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts 2005, may play a considerable role in recognising e-arbitration in the context of New York Convention 1958. To summarise, several legal gaps need to be addressed; therefore, the study recommends that the international arbitration communities, such as UNCITRAL, should develop an international legal framework to directly and precisely regulate e-arbitration to enhance legal validity of e-arbitration and to provide international harmonisation and uniformity.  https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/15395Traditional ArbitrationE-ArbitrationOnline Dispute ResolutionNew York Convention 1958UNCITRAL Model Laws
spellingShingle Mohamad Fateh Labanieh
Mohammad Azam Hussain
Nazli Mahdzir
THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATION
Journal of International Studies
Traditional Arbitration
E-Arbitration
Online Dispute Resolution
New York Convention 1958
UNCITRAL Model Laws
title THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATION
title_full THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATION
title_fullStr THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATION
title_full_unstemmed THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATION
title_short THE LEGAL CAPACITY OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND LAWS TO LEGALISE E-ARBITRATION
title_sort legal capacity of international conventions and laws to legalise e arbitration
topic Traditional Arbitration
E-Arbitration
Online Dispute Resolution
New York Convention 1958
UNCITRAL Model Laws
url https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/15395
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamadfatehlabanieh thelegalcapacityofinternationalconventionsandlawstolegaliseearbitration
AT mohammadazamhussain thelegalcapacityofinternationalconventionsandlawstolegaliseearbitration
AT nazlimahdzir thelegalcapacityofinternationalconventionsandlawstolegaliseearbitration
AT mohamadfatehlabanieh legalcapacityofinternationalconventionsandlawstolegaliseearbitration
AT mohammadazamhussain legalcapacityofinternationalconventionsandlawstolegaliseearbitration
AT nazlimahdzir legalcapacityofinternationalconventionsandlawstolegaliseearbitration