Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy
Analytical metaphysics in the 20th century was marked by the predominance of scientifi c reductionism. As a result metaphysics was considered dependent on the natural sciences in its topics and methodology. Conversely, the last two decades introduced new trends, defending the autonomy of metaphysica...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
St. Tikhon's Orthodox University
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://periodical.pstgu.ru/en/pdf/article/3444 |
_version_ | 1818661644429950976 |
---|---|
author | Karpov Kirill |
author_facet | Karpov Kirill |
author_sort | Karpov Kirill |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Analytical metaphysics in the 20th century was marked by the predominance of scientifi c reductionism. As a result metaphysics was considered dependent on the natural sciences in its topics and methodology. Conversely, the last two decades introduced new trends, defending the autonomy of metaphysical knowledge, while keeping such an important distinguishing feature of analytical philosophy as orientation on achievements of natural sciences. Hylomorphism is one of these new trends, which might be characterized as 'neo-Aristotelian’. Contemporary Hylomorphism is heterogeneous, has a number of branches, which are united by the idea that all material objects are composed of two basic elements — matter and form. The latter is often understood as a form in the strict sense, as a structure, a constitution or a power. The author considers the main issue faced by all hylomorphic ontologies: if matter and form are independent principles, what then unites them into a single composite? The article pays particular attention to the application of hylomorphic ontologies in solving such important philosophical and theological problems as the problem of the material constitution, mind-body problem, the Trinity. The last aspect deserves special attention. The author analyzes advantages and disadvantages of the proposed hylomorphic solutions. The main advantage is the amazing fl exibility of hylomorphic ontologies — they allow philosophers to introduce easily new principles, thus adopting to various problems solving. The disadvantages come directly from the main advantage and consist in weak reconcilement of those new principles with each other. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T04:48:20Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3b0146bb9854479cbc7342174dcc1ccf |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1991-640X 1991-640X |
language | Russian |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T04:48:20Z |
publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
publisher | St. Tikhon's Orthodox University |
record_format | Article |
series | Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия |
spelling | doaj.art-3b0146bb9854479cbc7342174dcc1ccf2022-12-21T22:02:59ZrusSt. Tikhon's Orthodox UniversityВестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия1991-640X1991-640X2016-12-01668789310.15382/sturI201668.78-93 Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical PhilosophyKarpov KirillAnalytical metaphysics in the 20th century was marked by the predominance of scientifi c reductionism. As a result metaphysics was considered dependent on the natural sciences in its topics and methodology. Conversely, the last two decades introduced new trends, defending the autonomy of metaphysical knowledge, while keeping such an important distinguishing feature of analytical philosophy as orientation on achievements of natural sciences. Hylomorphism is one of these new trends, which might be characterized as 'neo-Aristotelian’. Contemporary Hylomorphism is heterogeneous, has a number of branches, which are united by the idea that all material objects are composed of two basic elements — matter and form. The latter is often understood as a form in the strict sense, as a structure, a constitution or a power. The author considers the main issue faced by all hylomorphic ontologies: if matter and form are independent principles, what then unites them into a single composite? The article pays particular attention to the application of hylomorphic ontologies in solving such important philosophical and theological problems as the problem of the material constitution, mind-body problem, the Trinity. The last aspect deserves special attention. The author analyzes advantages and disadvantages of the proposed hylomorphic solutions. The main advantage is the amazing fl exibility of hylomorphic ontologies — they allow philosophers to introduce easily new principles, thus adopting to various problems solving. The disadvantages come directly from the main advantage and consist in weak reconcilement of those new principles with each other.http://periodical.pstgu.ru/en/pdf/article/3444analytical metaphysicshylomorphismmatterformstructuressubstancecompositionunity of substancematerial constitutionmind-body problemTrinity |
spellingShingle | Karpov Kirill Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия analytical metaphysics hylomorphism matter form structures substance composition unity of substance material constitution mind-body problem Trinity |
title | Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy |
title_full | Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy |
title_fullStr | Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed | Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy |
title_short | Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy |
title_sort | hylomorphism in modern analytical philosophy |
topic | analytical metaphysics hylomorphism matter form structures substance composition unity of substance material constitution mind-body problem Trinity |
url | http://periodical.pstgu.ru/en/pdf/article/3444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karpovkirill hylomorphisminmodernanalyticalphilosophy |