Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy

Analytical metaphysics in the 20th century was marked by the predominance of scientifi c reductionism. As a result metaphysics was considered dependent on the natural sciences in its topics and methodology. Conversely, the last two decades introduced new trends, defending the autonomy of metaphysica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karpov Kirill
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: St. Tikhon's Orthodox University 2016-12-01
Series:Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodical.pstgu.ru/en/pdf/article/3444
_version_ 1818661644429950976
author Karpov Kirill
author_facet Karpov Kirill
author_sort Karpov Kirill
collection DOAJ
description Analytical metaphysics in the 20th century was marked by the predominance of scientifi c reductionism. As a result metaphysics was considered dependent on the natural sciences in its topics and methodology. Conversely, the last two decades introduced new trends, defending the autonomy of metaphysical knowledge, while keeping such an important distinguishing feature of analytical philosophy as orientation on achievements of natural sciences. Hylomorphism is one of these new trends, which might be characterized as 'neo-Aristotelian’. Contemporary Hylomorphism is heterogeneous, has a number of branches, which are united by the idea that all material objects are composed of two basic elements — matter and form. The latter is often understood as a form in the strict sense, as a structure, a constitution or a power. The author considers the main issue faced by all hylomorphic ontologies: if matter and form are independent principles, what then unites them into a single composite? The article pays particular attention to the application of hylomorphic ontologies in solving such important philosophical and theological problems as the problem of the material constitution, mind-body problem, the Trinity. The last aspect deserves special attention. The author analyzes advantages and disadvantages of the proposed hylomorphic solutions. The main advantage is the amazing fl exibility of hylomorphic ontologies — they allow philosophers to introduce easily new principles, thus adopting to various problems solving. The disadvantages come directly from the main advantage and consist in weak reconcilement of those new principles with each other.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T04:48:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b0146bb9854479cbc7342174dcc1ccf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-640X
1991-640X
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-12-17T04:48:20Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher St. Tikhon's Orthodox University
record_format Article
series Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия
spelling doaj.art-3b0146bb9854479cbc7342174dcc1ccf2022-12-21T22:02:59ZrusSt. Tikhon's Orthodox UniversityВестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия1991-640X1991-640X2016-12-01668789310.15382/sturI201668.78-93 Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical PhilosophyKarpov KirillAnalytical metaphysics in the 20th century was marked by the predominance of scientifi c reductionism. As a result metaphysics was considered dependent on the natural sciences in its topics and methodology. Conversely, the last two decades introduced new trends, defending the autonomy of metaphysical knowledge, while keeping such an important distinguishing feature of analytical philosophy as orientation on achievements of natural sciences. Hylomorphism is one of these new trends, which might be characterized as 'neo-Aristotelian’. Contemporary Hylomorphism is heterogeneous, has a number of branches, which are united by the idea that all material objects are composed of two basic elements — matter and form. The latter is often understood as a form in the strict sense, as a structure, a constitution or a power. The author considers the main issue faced by all hylomorphic ontologies: if matter and form are independent principles, what then unites them into a single composite? The article pays particular attention to the application of hylomorphic ontologies in solving such important philosophical and theological problems as the problem of the material constitution, mind-body problem, the Trinity. The last aspect deserves special attention. The author analyzes advantages and disadvantages of the proposed hylomorphic solutions. The main advantage is the amazing fl exibility of hylomorphic ontologies — they allow philosophers to introduce easily new principles, thus adopting to various problems solving. The disadvantages come directly from the main advantage and consist in weak reconcilement of those new principles with each other.http://periodical.pstgu.ru/en/pdf/article/3444analytical metaphysicshylomorphismmatterformstructuressubstancecompositionunity of substancematerial constitutionmind-body problemTrinity
spellingShingle Karpov Kirill
Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy
Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия
analytical metaphysics
hylomorphism
matter
form
structures
substance
composition
unity of substance
material constitution
mind-body problem
Trinity
title Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy
title_full Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy
title_fullStr Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy
title_short Hylomorphism in Modern Analytical Philosophy
title_sort hylomorphism in modern analytical philosophy
topic analytical metaphysics
hylomorphism
matter
form
structures
substance
composition
unity of substance
material constitution
mind-body problem
Trinity
url http://periodical.pstgu.ru/en/pdf/article/3444
work_keys_str_mv AT karpovkirill hylomorphisminmodernanalyticalphilosophy