Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave Hindcasts

Landfalling tropical cyclones (TC) generate extreme waves, introducing significant property, personal, and financial risks and damage. Accurate simulations of the sea state during these storms are used to support risk and damage assessments and the design of coastal structures. However, the TCs gene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Rogowski, Sophia Merrifield, Clarence Collins, Tyler Hesser, Allison Ho, Randy Bucciarelli, James Behrens, Eric Terrill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/690
_version_ 1797528932269948928
author Peter Rogowski
Sophia Merrifield
Clarence Collins
Tyler Hesser
Allison Ho
Randy Bucciarelli
James Behrens
Eric Terrill
author_facet Peter Rogowski
Sophia Merrifield
Clarence Collins
Tyler Hesser
Allison Ho
Randy Bucciarelli
James Behrens
Eric Terrill
author_sort Peter Rogowski
collection DOAJ
description Landfalling tropical cyclones (TC) generate extreme waves, introducing significant property, personal, and financial risks and damage. Accurate simulations of the sea state during these storms are used to support risk and damage assessments and the design of coastal structures. However, the TCs generate a complex surface gravity wave field as a result of the inherently strong temporal and spatial gradients of the wind forcing. This complexity is a significant challenge to model. To advance our understanding of the performance of these models on the eastern seaboard of the United States, we conduct an assessment of four hindcast products, three based on WAVEWATCH-III and the other using the Wave Modeling project, for six major landfall TCs between 2011–2019. Unique to our assessment was a comprehensive analysis of these hindcast products against an array of fixed wave buoys that generate high quality data. The analysis reveals a general tendency for the wave models to underestimate significant wave height (Hs) around the peak of the TC. However, when viewed on an individual TC basis, distinct Hs error patterns are evident. Case studies of hurricanes Sandy and Florence illustrate complex Hs bias patterns, likely resulting from various mechanisms including insufficient resolution, improper wind input and source term parameterization (e.g., drag coefficient), and omission of wave–current interactions. Despite the added challenges of simulating complex wave fields in shallow coastal waters, the higher resolution Wave Information Study and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (ST4 parameterization only) hindcasts perform relatively well. Results from this study illustrate the challenge of simulating the spatial and temporal variability of TC generated wave fields and demonstrate the value of in-situ validation data such as the north Atlantic buoy array.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:06:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b0657ed154c42ca92afa6d15e57caab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1312
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:06:23Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
spelling doaj.art-3b0657ed154c42ca92afa6d15e57caab2023-11-22T01:29:02ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122021-06-019769010.3390/jmse9070690Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave HindcastsPeter Rogowski0Sophia Merrifield1Clarence Collins2Tyler Hesser3Allison Ho4Randy Bucciarelli5James Behrens6Eric Terrill7Coastal Observing R&D Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USACoastal Observing R&D Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USACoastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center, Duck, NC 27949, USACoastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USACoastal Observing R&D Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USACoastal Data Information Program, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, CA 92037, USACoastal Data Information Program, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, CA 92037, USACoastal Observing R&D Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USALandfalling tropical cyclones (TC) generate extreme waves, introducing significant property, personal, and financial risks and damage. Accurate simulations of the sea state during these storms are used to support risk and damage assessments and the design of coastal structures. However, the TCs generate a complex surface gravity wave field as a result of the inherently strong temporal and spatial gradients of the wind forcing. This complexity is a significant challenge to model. To advance our understanding of the performance of these models on the eastern seaboard of the United States, we conduct an assessment of four hindcast products, three based on WAVEWATCH-III and the other using the Wave Modeling project, for six major landfall TCs between 2011–2019. Unique to our assessment was a comprehensive analysis of these hindcast products against an array of fixed wave buoys that generate high quality data. The analysis reveals a general tendency for the wave models to underestimate significant wave height (Hs) around the peak of the TC. However, when viewed on an individual TC basis, distinct Hs error patterns are evident. Case studies of hurricanes Sandy and Florence illustrate complex Hs bias patterns, likely resulting from various mechanisms including insufficient resolution, improper wind input and source term parameterization (e.g., drag coefficient), and omission of wave–current interactions. Despite the added challenges of simulating complex wave fields in shallow coastal waters, the higher resolution Wave Information Study and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (ST4 parameterization only) hindcasts perform relatively well. Results from this study illustrate the challenge of simulating the spatial and temporal variability of TC generated wave fields and demonstrate the value of in-situ validation data such as the north Atlantic buoy array.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/690tropical cycloneshurricanesextreme waveswave model hindcastsobservational networkswave buoys
spellingShingle Peter Rogowski
Sophia Merrifield
Clarence Collins
Tyler Hesser
Allison Ho
Randy Bucciarelli
James Behrens
Eric Terrill
Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave Hindcasts
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
tropical cyclones
hurricanes
extreme waves
wave model hindcasts
observational networks
wave buoys
title Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave Hindcasts
title_full Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave Hindcasts
title_fullStr Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave Hindcasts
title_full_unstemmed Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave Hindcasts
title_short Performance Assessments of Hurricane Wave Hindcasts
title_sort performance assessments of hurricane wave hindcasts
topic tropical cyclones
hurricanes
extreme waves
wave model hindcasts
observational networks
wave buoys
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/690
work_keys_str_mv AT peterrogowski performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts
AT sophiamerrifield performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts
AT clarencecollins performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts
AT tylerhesser performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts
AT allisonho performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts
AT randybucciarelli performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts
AT jamesbehrens performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts
AT ericterrill performanceassessmentsofhurricanewavehindcasts