Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells (OGCs) is characterized by multinucleated OGCs, and usually displays inflammatory hypervascular stroma. OGCs may derive from tumor-associated macrophages, but their nature remains controversial. We report two cases,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shishido-Hara Yukiko, Kurata Atsushi, Fujiwara Masachika, Itoh Hiroki, Imoto Shigeru, Kamma Hiroshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-08-01
Series:Diagnostic Pathology
Online Access:http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/5/1/55
_version_ 1818473530644234240
author Shishido-Hara Yukiko
Kurata Atsushi
Fujiwara Masachika
Itoh Hiroki
Imoto Shigeru
Kamma Hiroshi
author_facet Shishido-Hara Yukiko
Kurata Atsushi
Fujiwara Masachika
Itoh Hiroki
Imoto Shigeru
Kamma Hiroshi
author_sort Shishido-Hara Yukiko
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells (OGCs) is characterized by multinucleated OGCs, and usually displays inflammatory hypervascular stroma. OGCs may derive from tumor-associated macrophages, but their nature remains controversial. We report two cases, in which OGCs appear in common microenvironment despite different tumoural histology. A 44-year-old woman (Case 1) had OGCs accompanying invasive ductal carcinoma, and an 83-year-old woman (Case 2) with carcinosarcoma. Immunohistochemically, in both cases, tumoural and non-tumoural cells strongly expressed VEGF and MMP12, which promote macrophage migration and angiogenesis. The Chalkley count on CD-31-stained sections revealed elevated angiogenesis in both cases. The OGCs expressed bone-osteoclast markers (MMP9, TRAP, cathepsin K) and a histiocyte marker (CD68), but not an MHC class II antigen, HLA-DR. The results indicate a pathogenesis: regardless of tumoural histology, OGCs derive from macrophages, likely in response to hypervascular microenvironments with secretion of common cytokines. The OGCs have acquired bone-osteoclast-like characteristics, but lost antigen presentation abilities as an anti-cancer defense. Appearance of OGCs may not be anti-tumoural immunological reactions, but rather pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophage responding to hypervascular microenvironments induced by breast cancer.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-14T04:24:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b25b52a04f14ea3a42fe3ca1dad92c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-1596
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T04:24:59Z
publishDate 2010-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Diagnostic Pathology
spelling doaj.art-3b25b52a04f14ea3a42fe3ca1dad92c42022-12-22T02:12:21ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962010-08-01515510.1186/1746-1596-5-55Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?Shishido-Hara YukikoKurata AtsushiFujiwara MasachikaItoh HirokiImoto ShigeruKamma Hiroshi<p>Abstract</p> <p>Breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells (OGCs) is characterized by multinucleated OGCs, and usually displays inflammatory hypervascular stroma. OGCs may derive from tumor-associated macrophages, but their nature remains controversial. We report two cases, in which OGCs appear in common microenvironment despite different tumoural histology. A 44-year-old woman (Case 1) had OGCs accompanying invasive ductal carcinoma, and an 83-year-old woman (Case 2) with carcinosarcoma. Immunohistochemically, in both cases, tumoural and non-tumoural cells strongly expressed VEGF and MMP12, which promote macrophage migration and angiogenesis. The Chalkley count on CD-31-stained sections revealed elevated angiogenesis in both cases. The OGCs expressed bone-osteoclast markers (MMP9, TRAP, cathepsin K) and a histiocyte marker (CD68), but not an MHC class II antigen, HLA-DR. The results indicate a pathogenesis: regardless of tumoural histology, OGCs derive from macrophages, likely in response to hypervascular microenvironments with secretion of common cytokines. The OGCs have acquired bone-osteoclast-like characteristics, but lost antigen presentation abilities as an anti-cancer defense. Appearance of OGCs may not be anti-tumoural immunological reactions, but rather pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophage responding to hypervascular microenvironments induced by breast cancer.</p>http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/5/1/55
spellingShingle Shishido-Hara Yukiko
Kurata Atsushi
Fujiwara Masachika
Itoh Hiroki
Imoto Shigeru
Kamma Hiroshi
Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?
Diagnostic Pathology
title Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?
title_full Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?
title_fullStr Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?
title_full_unstemmed Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?
title_short Two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells: Are the osteoclastic giant cells pro-tumoural differentiation of macrophages?
title_sort two cases of breast carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells are the osteoclastic giant cells pro tumoural differentiation of macrophages
url http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/5/1/55
work_keys_str_mv AT shishidoharayukiko twocasesofbreastcarcinomawithosteoclasticgiantcellsaretheosteoclasticgiantcellsprotumouraldifferentiationofmacrophages
AT kurataatsushi twocasesofbreastcarcinomawithosteoclasticgiantcellsaretheosteoclasticgiantcellsprotumouraldifferentiationofmacrophages
AT fujiwaramasachika twocasesofbreastcarcinomawithosteoclasticgiantcellsaretheosteoclasticgiantcellsprotumouraldifferentiationofmacrophages
AT itohhiroki twocasesofbreastcarcinomawithosteoclasticgiantcellsaretheosteoclasticgiantcellsprotumouraldifferentiationofmacrophages
AT imotoshigeru twocasesofbreastcarcinomawithosteoclasticgiantcellsaretheosteoclasticgiantcellsprotumouraldifferentiationofmacrophages
AT kammahiroshi twocasesofbreastcarcinomawithosteoclasticgiantcellsaretheosteoclasticgiantcellsprotumouraldifferentiationofmacrophages