Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements

<p>Stratospheric ozone loss inside the Arctic polar vortex for the winters between 2004–2005 and 2012–2013 has been quantified using measurements from the space-borne Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS). For the first time, an evaluation has been performed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Griffin, K. A. Walker, I. Wohltmann, S. S. Dhomse, M. Rex, M. P. Chipperfield, W. Feng, G. L. Manney, J. Liu, D. Tarasick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/577/2019/acp-19-577-2019.pdf
_version_ 1818954201627099136
author D. Griffin
K. A. Walker
K. A. Walker
I. Wohltmann
S. S. Dhomse
S. S. Dhomse
M. Rex
M. P. Chipperfield
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
W. Feng
G. L. Manney
G. L. Manney
J. Liu
J. Liu
D. Tarasick
author_facet D. Griffin
K. A. Walker
K. A. Walker
I. Wohltmann
S. S. Dhomse
S. S. Dhomse
M. Rex
M. P. Chipperfield
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
W. Feng
G. L. Manney
G. L. Manney
J. Liu
J. Liu
D. Tarasick
author_sort D. Griffin
collection DOAJ
description <p>Stratospheric ozone loss inside the Arctic polar vortex for the winters between 2004–2005 and 2012–2013 has been quantified using measurements from the space-borne Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS). For the first time, an evaluation has been performed of six different ozone loss estimation methods based on the same single observational dataset to determine the Arctic ozone loss (mixing ratio loss profiles and the partial-column ozone losses between 380 and 550&thinsp;K). The methods used are the tracer-tracer correlation, the artificial tracer correlation, the average vortex profile descent, and the passive subtraction with model output from both Lagrangian and Eulerian chemical transport models (CTMs). For the tracer-tracer, the artificial tracer, and the average vortex profile descent approaches, various tracers have been used that are also measured by ACE-FTS. From these seven tracers investigated (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>, <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span>, <span class="inline-formula">HF</span>, <span class="inline-formula">OCS</span>, CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113), we found that <span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>, <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span>, <span class="inline-formula">HF</span>, and CFC-12 are the most suitable tracers for investigating polar stratospheric ozone depletion with ACE-FTS v3.5. The ozone loss estimates (in terms of the mixing ratio as well as total column ozone) are generally in good agreement between the different methods and among the different tracers. However, using the average vortex profile descent technique typically leads to smaller maximum losses (by approximately 15–30&thinsp;DU) compared to all other methods. The passive subtraction method using output from CTMs generally results in slightly larger losses compared to the techniques that use ACE-FTS measurements only. The ozone loss computed, using both measurements and models, shows the greatest loss during the 2010–2011 Arctic winter. For that year, our results show that maximum ozone loss (2.1–2.7&thinsp;ppmv) occurred at 460&thinsp;K. The estimated partial-column ozone loss inside the polar vortex (between 380 and 550&thinsp;K) using the different methods is 66–103, 61–95, 59–96, 41–89, and 85–122&thinsp;DU for March 2005, 2007, 2008, 2010, and 2011, respectively. Ozone loss is difficult to diagnose for the Arctic winters during 2005–2006, 2008–2009, 2011–2012, and 2012–2013, because strong polar vortex disturbance or major sudden stratospheric warming events significantly perturbed the polar vortex, thereby limiting the number of measurements available for the analysis of ozone loss.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-20T10:18:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b270db0edf3477e911ed1c5805c6b65
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T10:18:24Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-3b270db0edf3477e911ed1c5805c6b652022-12-21T19:43:59ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242019-01-011957760110.5194/acp-19-577-2019Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurementsD. Griffin0K. A. Walker1K. A. Walker2I. Wohltmann3S. S. Dhomse4S. S. Dhomse5M. Rex6M. P. Chipperfield7M. P. Chipperfield8W. Feng9W. Feng10G. L. Manney11G. L. Manney12J. Liu13J. Liu14D. Tarasick15Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, CanadaDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, CanadaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, CanadaAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 14401 Potsdam, GermanySchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKNational Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, 14401 Potsdam, GermanySchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKNational Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKNorthWest Research Associates, Socorro, New Mexico, USADepartment of Physics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USADepartment of Geography and Program in Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, CanadaNanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, ChinaScience and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T3, Canada<p>Stratospheric ozone loss inside the Arctic polar vortex for the winters between 2004–2005 and 2012–2013 has been quantified using measurements from the space-borne Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS). For the first time, an evaluation has been performed of six different ozone loss estimation methods based on the same single observational dataset to determine the Arctic ozone loss (mixing ratio loss profiles and the partial-column ozone losses between 380 and 550&thinsp;K). The methods used are the tracer-tracer correlation, the artificial tracer correlation, the average vortex profile descent, and the passive subtraction with model output from both Lagrangian and Eulerian chemical transport models (CTMs). For the tracer-tracer, the artificial tracer, and the average vortex profile descent approaches, various tracers have been used that are also measured by ACE-FTS. From these seven tracers investigated (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>, <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span>, <span class="inline-formula">HF</span>, <span class="inline-formula">OCS</span>, CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113), we found that <span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>, <span class="inline-formula">N<sub>2</sub>O</span>, <span class="inline-formula">HF</span>, and CFC-12 are the most suitable tracers for investigating polar stratospheric ozone depletion with ACE-FTS v3.5. The ozone loss estimates (in terms of the mixing ratio as well as total column ozone) are generally in good agreement between the different methods and among the different tracers. However, using the average vortex profile descent technique typically leads to smaller maximum losses (by approximately 15–30&thinsp;DU) compared to all other methods. The passive subtraction method using output from CTMs generally results in slightly larger losses compared to the techniques that use ACE-FTS measurements only. The ozone loss computed, using both measurements and models, shows the greatest loss during the 2010–2011 Arctic winter. For that year, our results show that maximum ozone loss (2.1–2.7&thinsp;ppmv) occurred at 460&thinsp;K. The estimated partial-column ozone loss inside the polar vortex (between 380 and 550&thinsp;K) using the different methods is 66–103, 61–95, 59–96, 41–89, and 85–122&thinsp;DU for March 2005, 2007, 2008, 2010, and 2011, respectively. Ozone loss is difficult to diagnose for the Arctic winters during 2005–2006, 2008–2009, 2011–2012, and 2012–2013, because strong polar vortex disturbance or major sudden stratospheric warming events significantly perturbed the polar vortex, thereby limiting the number of measurements available for the analysis of ozone loss.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/577/2019/acp-19-577-2019.pdf
spellingShingle D. Griffin
K. A. Walker
K. A. Walker
I. Wohltmann
S. S. Dhomse
S. S. Dhomse
M. Rex
M. P. Chipperfield
M. P. Chipperfield
W. Feng
W. Feng
G. L. Manney
G. L. Manney
J. Liu
J. Liu
D. Tarasick
Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements
title_full Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements
title_fullStr Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements
title_full_unstemmed Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements
title_short Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements
title_sort stratospheric ozone loss in the arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ace fts measurements
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/577/2019/acp-19-577-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dgriffin stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT kawalker stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT kawalker stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT iwohltmann stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT ssdhomse stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT ssdhomse stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT mrex stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT mpchipperfield stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT mpchipperfield stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT wfeng stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT wfeng stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT glmanney stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT glmanney stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT jliu stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT jliu stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements
AT dtarasick stratosphericozonelossinthearcticwintersbetween2005and2013derivedwithaceftsmeasurements