Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental study

Abstract Objective This study examined whether exposure to smoking and vaping cues the urge to smoke or vape. It extends previous studies on first-generation cigalikes (visually similar to cigarettes) and second-generation devices (visually similar to pens) by including third-generation tank system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna K. M. Blackwell, Katie De-loyde, Laura A. Brocklebank, Olivia M. Maynard, Theresa M. Marteau, Gareth J. Hollands, Paul C. Fletcher, Angela S. Attwood, Richard W. Morris, Marcus R. Munafò
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-01-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4899-3
_version_ 1818821694326833152
author Anna K. M. Blackwell
Katie De-loyde
Laura A. Brocklebank
Olivia M. Maynard
Theresa M. Marteau
Gareth J. Hollands
Paul C. Fletcher
Angela S. Attwood
Richard W. Morris
Marcus R. Munafò
author_facet Anna K. M. Blackwell
Katie De-loyde
Laura A. Brocklebank
Olivia M. Maynard
Theresa M. Marteau
Gareth J. Hollands
Paul C. Fletcher
Angela S. Attwood
Richard W. Morris
Marcus R. Munafò
author_sort Anna K. M. Blackwell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This study examined whether exposure to smoking and vaping cues the urge to smoke or vape. It extends previous studies on first-generation cigalikes (visually similar to cigarettes) and second-generation devices (visually similar to pens) by including third-generation tank system devices (larger bulky units). In an online experiment, participants were randomly assigned to view one of four videos, which included smoking, vaping (cigalike or tank system), or neutral cues. The primary outcome was urge to smoke. Secondary outcomes were urge to vape, desire to smoke and vape, and intention to quit or remain abstinent from smoking. Results UK adults varying in smoking (current or former) and vaping (user or non-user) status (n = 1120) completed the study: 184 (16%) failed study attention checks meaning 936 were included in the final analysis. Urges to smoke were similar across cue groups. Urges to vape were higher following exposure to vaping compared to neutral cues. There was no clear evidence of an interaction between cue group and smoking or vaping status. The lack of cueing effects on smoking urges is inconsistent with previous research, raising questions about the ability to assess craving in online settings.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T23:12:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b2b109751ef4c1398668d5451030c64
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T23:12:15Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-3b2b109751ef4c1398668d5451030c642022-12-21T20:48:18ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002020-01-011311610.1186/s13104-020-4899-3Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental studyAnna K. M. Blackwell0Katie De-loyde1Laura A. Brocklebank2Olivia M. Maynard3Theresa M. Marteau4Gareth J. Hollands5Paul C. Fletcher6Angela S. Attwood7Richard W. Morris8Marcus R. Munafò9School of Psychological Science, University of BristolSchool of Psychological Science, University of BristolSchool of Psychological Science, University of BristolSchool of Psychological Science, University of BristolBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of CambridgeBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, University of CambridgeSchool of Psychological Science, University of BristolBristol Medical School: Population Health SciencesSchool of Psychological Science, University of BristolAbstract Objective This study examined whether exposure to smoking and vaping cues the urge to smoke or vape. It extends previous studies on first-generation cigalikes (visually similar to cigarettes) and second-generation devices (visually similar to pens) by including third-generation tank system devices (larger bulky units). In an online experiment, participants were randomly assigned to view one of four videos, which included smoking, vaping (cigalike or tank system), or neutral cues. The primary outcome was urge to smoke. Secondary outcomes were urge to vape, desire to smoke and vape, and intention to quit or remain abstinent from smoking. Results UK adults varying in smoking (current or former) and vaping (user or non-user) status (n = 1120) completed the study: 184 (16%) failed study attention checks meaning 936 were included in the final analysis. Urges to smoke were similar across cue groups. Urges to vape were higher following exposure to vaping compared to neutral cues. There was no clear evidence of an interaction between cue group and smoking or vaping status. The lack of cueing effects on smoking urges is inconsistent with previous research, raising questions about the ability to assess craving in online settings.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4899-3SmokingCigaretteVapingE-cigaretteCue reactivityPublic health
spellingShingle Anna K. M. Blackwell
Katie De-loyde
Laura A. Brocklebank
Olivia M. Maynard
Theresa M. Marteau
Gareth J. Hollands
Paul C. Fletcher
Angela S. Attwood
Richard W. Morris
Marcus R. Munafò
Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental study
BMC Research Notes
Smoking
Cigarette
Vaping
E-cigarette
Cue reactivity
Public health
title Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental study
title_full Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental study
title_fullStr Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental study
title_short Tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping: an online experimental study
title_sort tobacco and electronic cigarette cues for smoking and vaping an online experimental study
topic Smoking
Cigarette
Vaping
E-cigarette
Cue reactivity
Public health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4899-3
work_keys_str_mv AT annakmblackwell tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT katiedeloyde tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT lauraabrocklebank tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT oliviammaynard tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT theresammarteau tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT garethjhollands tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT paulcfletcher tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT angelasattwood tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT richardwmorris tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy
AT marcusrmunafo tobaccoandelectroniccigarettecuesforsmokingandvapinganonlineexperimentalstudy