Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century Chesapeake

When servants would sign a contract, they knew it was for a determined span of time. However, what was on the paper was not an automatic reflection of the 17th century reality, especially in a foreign land where everything had to be done, and where the mortality rate and dangers were high. Therefore...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elodie Peyrol-Kleiber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Poitiers
Series:Cahiers du MIMMOC
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/mimmoc/2777
_version_ 1797305700631707648
author Elodie Peyrol-Kleiber
author_facet Elodie Peyrol-Kleiber
author_sort Elodie Peyrol-Kleiber
collection DOAJ
description When servants would sign a contract, they knew it was for a determined span of time. However, what was on the paper was not an automatic reflection of the 17th century reality, especially in a foreign land where everything had to be done, and where the mortality rate and dangers were high. Therefore, contracting an indenture often meant not recovering one’s freedom. In the case where a servant would survive his time of servitude, he had the right to claim freedom dues on the part of his master. Those were meant to help him settle as a free colonist, buying land, raising cattle and planting tobacco. This article focuses on the reality of the freedom dues, landownership and opportunities after the end of an indenture by contrasting what was on the paper with the real experiences of this class of often-forgotten commoners, however essential they were to feed the hungry stomach of the tobacco market.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T00:30:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b2eda76bba74b15ab3c00044a8dea1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1951-6789
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T00:30:29Z
publisher Université de Poitiers
record_format Article
series Cahiers du MIMMOC
spelling doaj.art-3b2eda76bba74b15ab3c00044a8dea1d2024-02-15T13:57:24ZengUniversité de PoitiersCahiers du MIMMOC1951-67891910.4000/mimmoc.2777Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century ChesapeakeElodie Peyrol-KleiberWhen servants would sign a contract, they knew it was for a determined span of time. However, what was on the paper was not an automatic reflection of the 17th century reality, especially in a foreign land where everything had to be done, and where the mortality rate and dangers were high. Therefore, contracting an indenture often meant not recovering one’s freedom. In the case where a servant would survive his time of servitude, he had the right to claim freedom dues on the part of his master. Those were meant to help him settle as a free colonist, buying land, raising cattle and planting tobacco. This article focuses on the reality of the freedom dues, landownership and opportunities after the end of an indenture by contrasting what was on the paper with the real experiences of this class of often-forgotten commoners, however essential they were to feed the hungry stomach of the tobacco market.https://journals.openedition.org/mimmoc/2777Indentured servitudecolonial Americafreedom duesemancipation17th century
spellingShingle Elodie Peyrol-Kleiber
Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century Chesapeake
Cahiers du MIMMOC
Indentured servitude
colonial America
freedom dues
emancipation
17th century
title Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century Chesapeake
title_full Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century Chesapeake
title_fullStr Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century Chesapeake
title_full_unstemmed Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century Chesapeake
title_short Starting Afresh : Freedom Dues vs Reality in 17th Century Chesapeake
title_sort starting afresh freedom dues vs reality in 17th century chesapeake
topic Indentured servitude
colonial America
freedom dues
emancipation
17th century
url https://journals.openedition.org/mimmoc/2777
work_keys_str_mv AT elodiepeyrolkleiber startingafreshfreedomduesvsrealityin17thcenturychesapeake