Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study

Abstract Background Cost-effectiveness studies on pacemakers have increased in the last years. However the number of long-term cost-utility studies is limited. The objective of this study was to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing remote monitoring (RM) versus conventional monitoring (CM) in h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa, Antonio Lopez-Villegas, Salvador Peiro, Daniel Catalan-Matamoros, Emilio Robles-Musso, Remedios Lopez-Liria, Cesar Leal-Costa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-11-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-020-01883-3
_version_ 1818408126165024768
author Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa
Antonio Lopez-Villegas
Salvador Peiro
Daniel Catalan-Matamoros
Emilio Robles-Musso
Remedios Lopez-Liria
Cesar Leal-Costa
author_facet Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa
Antonio Lopez-Villegas
Salvador Peiro
Daniel Catalan-Matamoros
Emilio Robles-Musso
Remedios Lopez-Liria
Cesar Leal-Costa
author_sort Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cost-effectiveness studies on pacemakers have increased in the last years. However the number of long-term cost-utility studies is limited. The objective of this study was to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing remote monitoring (RM) versus conventional monitoring (CM) in hospital of older patients with pacemakers, 5 years after implant. Methods Under a controlled, not randomized, nor masked clinical trial, 83 patients with pacemakers were initially selected. After five years of follow-up, a total of 55 patients (CM = 34; RM = 21) completed the study. A cost-utility analysis of RM in terms of costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was conducted. The costs from the Public Health System (PHS) as well as patients and their relatives were taken into account for the study. The robustness of the results was verified by the probabilistic analyses through Monte-Carlo simulations. Results After a five-year follow-up period, total costs were lower in the RM group by 23.02% than in the CM group (€274.52 versus €356.62; p = 0.033) because of a cost saving from patients’ perspective (€59.05 versus €102.98; p = 0.002). However, the reduction of in-hospital visits derived from RM exhibited insignificant impact on the costs from the PHS perspective, with a cost saving of 15.04% (€215.48 vs. €253.64; p = 0.144). Costs/QALYs obtained by the RM group were higher as compared to the CM group, although there were no significant differences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CM in comparison to RM became positive (€301.16). Conclusions This study confirms RM of older patients with pacemakers appears still as a cost-utility alternative to CM in hospital after 5 years of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: (Identifier: NCT02234245 ). Registered 09 September 2014 - Prospectively registered.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:38:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b333d1e3808414296f41a13498e43f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2318
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:38:46Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj.art-3b333d1e3808414296f41a13498e43f82022-12-21T23:07:52ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182020-11-0120111210.1186/s12877-020-01883-3Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE studyRafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa0Antonio Lopez-Villegas1Salvador Peiro2Daniel Catalan-Matamoros3Emilio Robles-Musso4Remedios Lopez-Liria5Cesar Leal-Costa6Management Unit, Hospital de PonienteSocial Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS–609 Research Group, Hospital de PonienteHealth Services Research Unit, FISABIO-PUBLIC HEALTHDepartment of Communication Studies, University Carlos III of MadridPacemaker Unit, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de PonienteDepartment of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Hum–498 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of AlmeríaNursing Department, University of MurciaAbstract Background Cost-effectiveness studies on pacemakers have increased in the last years. However the number of long-term cost-utility studies is limited. The objective of this study was to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing remote monitoring (RM) versus conventional monitoring (CM) in hospital of older patients with pacemakers, 5 years after implant. Methods Under a controlled, not randomized, nor masked clinical trial, 83 patients with pacemakers were initially selected. After five years of follow-up, a total of 55 patients (CM = 34; RM = 21) completed the study. A cost-utility analysis of RM in terms of costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was conducted. The costs from the Public Health System (PHS) as well as patients and their relatives were taken into account for the study. The robustness of the results was verified by the probabilistic analyses through Monte-Carlo simulations. Results After a five-year follow-up period, total costs were lower in the RM group by 23.02% than in the CM group (€274.52 versus €356.62; p = 0.033) because of a cost saving from patients’ perspective (€59.05 versus €102.98; p = 0.002). However, the reduction of in-hospital visits derived from RM exhibited insignificant impact on the costs from the PHS perspective, with a cost saving of 15.04% (€215.48 vs. €253.64; p = 0.144). Costs/QALYs obtained by the RM group were higher as compared to the CM group, although there were no significant differences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CM in comparison to RM became positive (€301.16). Conclusions This study confirms RM of older patients with pacemakers appears still as a cost-utility alternative to CM in hospital after 5 years of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: (Identifier: NCT02234245 ). Registered 09 September 2014 - Prospectively registered.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-020-01883-3Cost-utilityPacemakers follow-upQuality-adjusted life yearsRemote monitoringTelemedicine
spellingShingle Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa
Antonio Lopez-Villegas
Salvador Peiro
Daniel Catalan-Matamoros
Emilio Robles-Musso
Remedios Lopez-Liria
Cesar Leal-Costa
Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study
BMC Geriatrics
Cost-utility
Pacemakers follow-up
Quality-adjusted life years
Remote monitoring
Telemedicine
title Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study
title_full Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study
title_fullStr Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study
title_short Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study
title_sort long term cost utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers the poniente study
topic Cost-utility
Pacemakers follow-up
Quality-adjusted life years
Remote monitoring
Telemedicine
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-020-01883-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaeljesusbautistamesa longtermcostutilityanalysisofremotemonitoringofolderpatientswithpacemakerstheponientestudy
AT antoniolopezvillegas longtermcostutilityanalysisofremotemonitoringofolderpatientswithpacemakerstheponientestudy
AT salvadorpeiro longtermcostutilityanalysisofremotemonitoringofolderpatientswithpacemakerstheponientestudy
AT danielcatalanmatamoros longtermcostutilityanalysisofremotemonitoringofolderpatientswithpacemakerstheponientestudy
AT emilioroblesmusso longtermcostutilityanalysisofremotemonitoringofolderpatientswithpacemakerstheponientestudy
AT remedioslopezliria longtermcostutilityanalysisofremotemonitoringofolderpatientswithpacemakerstheponientestudy
AT cesarlealcosta longtermcostutilityanalysisofremotemonitoringofolderpatientswithpacemakerstheponientestudy