Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?

Minimally invasive surgery emerged in the 1980s as a safe and effective technique which requires smaller incisions and, usually, a shorter hospital stay compared to traditional surgery. Since then, minimally invasive surgery has expanded in many surgical specialties. One of its newest application in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Massimo Candiani, Jessica Ottolina, Noemi Salmeri, Sara D’Alessandro, Iacopo Tandoi, Ludovica Bartiromo, Matteo Schimberni, Stefano Ferrari, Roberta Villanacci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1147877/full
_version_ 1797859677335191552
author Massimo Candiani
Jessica Ottolina
Noemi Salmeri
Sara D’Alessandro
Iacopo Tandoi
Ludovica Bartiromo
Matteo Schimberni
Stefano Ferrari
Roberta Villanacci
author_facet Massimo Candiani
Jessica Ottolina
Noemi Salmeri
Sara D’Alessandro
Iacopo Tandoi
Ludovica Bartiromo
Matteo Schimberni
Stefano Ferrari
Roberta Villanacci
author_sort Massimo Candiani
collection DOAJ
description Minimally invasive surgery emerged in the 1980s as a safe and effective technique which requires smaller incisions and, usually, a shorter hospital stay compared to traditional surgery. Since then, minimally invasive surgery has expanded in many surgical specialties. One of its newest application in gynecology stands in the infertility management of young women with unexplained infertility or suspected endometriosis. In these cases, laparoscopy allows to diagnose and treat the disease aiming to increase at best the chances of spontaneous pregnancy or trough assisted reproductive technology. Nowadays, minimally invasive surgical approach of ovarian endometriosis consists of either laparoscopic cystectomy or ablative techniques such as laparoscopic CO2 fiber laser vaporization. Although cystectomy represents the gold standard according to the latest Cochrane review, some endometriosis experts are worried about its detrimental effect on healthy ovarian parenchyma and suggest preferring a less aggressive approach such as CO2 fiber laser vaporization. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the available evidences about the impact of the two surgical procedures on ovarian reserve markers and pregnancy outcome.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:33:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b38a0010ae145159638db1e348961d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:33:30Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-3b38a0010ae145159638db1e348961d72023-03-27T05:06:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-03-011010.3389/fsurg.2023.11478771147877Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?Massimo CandianiJessica OttolinaNoemi SalmeriSara D’AlessandroIacopo TandoiLudovica BartiromoMatteo SchimberniStefano FerrariRoberta VillanacciMinimally invasive surgery emerged in the 1980s as a safe and effective technique which requires smaller incisions and, usually, a shorter hospital stay compared to traditional surgery. Since then, minimally invasive surgery has expanded in many surgical specialties. One of its newest application in gynecology stands in the infertility management of young women with unexplained infertility or suspected endometriosis. In these cases, laparoscopy allows to diagnose and treat the disease aiming to increase at best the chances of spontaneous pregnancy or trough assisted reproductive technology. Nowadays, minimally invasive surgical approach of ovarian endometriosis consists of either laparoscopic cystectomy or ablative techniques such as laparoscopic CO2 fiber laser vaporization. Although cystectomy represents the gold standard according to the latest Cochrane review, some endometriosis experts are worried about its detrimental effect on healthy ovarian parenchyma and suggest preferring a less aggressive approach such as CO2 fiber laser vaporization. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the available evidences about the impact of the two surgical procedures on ovarian reserve markers and pregnancy outcome.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1147877/fullinfertilityminimally invasive surgeryendometriosiscystectomyCO2 laser
spellingShingle Massimo Candiani
Jessica Ottolina
Noemi Salmeri
Sara D’Alessandro
Iacopo Tandoi
Ludovica Bartiromo
Matteo Schimberni
Stefano Ferrari
Roberta Villanacci
Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?
Frontiers in Surgery
infertility
minimally invasive surgery
endometriosis
cystectomy
CO2 laser
title Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?
title_full Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?
title_fullStr Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?
title_short Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far?
title_sort minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility cystectomy vs co2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far
topic infertility
minimally invasive surgery
endometriosis
cystectomy
CO2 laser
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1147877/full
work_keys_str_mv AT massimocandiani minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT jessicaottolina minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT noemisalmeri minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT saradalessandro minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT iacopotandoi minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT ludovicabartiromo minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT matteoschimberni minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT stefanoferrari minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar
AT robertavillanacci minimallyinvasivesurgeryforovarianendometriosisasameanofimprovingfertilitycystectomyvsco2fiberlaserablationwhatdoweknowsofar