Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland

In 1968, an Ad Hoc committee at the Harvard Medical School advanced new criteria for determining death. It proposed that patients in irreversible coma with no discernible central nervous system activity were actually dead. The committee paved the way for the “whole brain” definition of death...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Settimio Monteverde, Annette Rid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2012-08-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1557
_version_ 1811194144995934208
author Settimio Monteverde
Annette Rid
author_facet Settimio Monteverde
Annette Rid
author_sort Settimio Monteverde
collection DOAJ
description In 1968, an Ad Hoc committee at the Harvard Medical School advanced new criteria for determining death. It proposed that patients in irreversible coma with no discernible central nervous system activity were actually dead. The committee paved the way for the “whole brain” definition of death, which has reached broad public acceptance and legal enactment in many countries. Despite this, the philosophical and ethical debate about the “whole brain” definition of death is far from being closed. This paper analyses the ongoing controversy and evaluates the recent revision of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences guidelines for determining death.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:21:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b54c1f074fb4b0bbe0c1c31d89ea9ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:21:00Z
publishDate 2012-08-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-3b54c1f074fb4b0bbe0c1c31d89ea9ca2022-12-22T03:55:43ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972012-08-01142333410.4414/smw.2012.13667Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from SwitzerlandSettimio MonteverdeAnnette Rid In 1968, an Ad Hoc committee at the Harvard Medical School advanced new criteria for determining death. It proposed that patients in irreversible coma with no discernible central nervous system activity were actually dead. The committee paved the way for the “whole brain” definition of death, which has reached broad public acceptance and legal enactment in many countries. Despite this, the philosophical and ethical debate about the “whole brain” definition of death is far from being closed. This paper analyses the ongoing controversy and evaluates the recent revision of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences guidelines for determining death. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1557determination of deathend-of-lifemedical ethicsorgan transplantation
spellingShingle Settimio Monteverde
Annette Rid
Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland
Swiss Medical Weekly
determination of death
end-of-life
medical ethics
organ transplantation
title Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland
title_full Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland
title_fullStr Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland
title_short Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland
title_sort controversies in the determination of death perspectives from switzerland
topic determination of death
end-of-life
medical ethics
organ transplantation
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1557
work_keys_str_mv AT settimiomonteverde controversiesinthedeterminationofdeathperspectivesfromswitzerland
AT annetterid controversiesinthedeterminationofdeathperspectivesfromswitzerland