Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS mammogram reports in Songklanagarind Hospital. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 2,064 mammogram reports was conducted and these were compared to the matching pathological reports. The reports were issued between January and December, 2005...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Prince of Songkla University
2011-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/319 |
_version_ | 1818198518067625984 |
---|---|
author | Puwasit Trijaksang Somkiat Sunpaweravong Srila Samphao Pattama Tana-anantarak Rassamee Sangthong |
author_facet | Puwasit Trijaksang Somkiat Sunpaweravong Srila Samphao Pattama Tana-anantarak Rassamee Sangthong |
author_sort | Puwasit Trijaksang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS mammogram reports in Songklanagarind Hospital.
Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 2,064 mammogram reports was conducted and these were compared to the matching pathological reports. The reports were issued between January and December, 2005.
Results: There were 828 mammograms for breast cancer screening and 1,236 cases for diagnosis of breast diseases. The negative mammogram group (Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System; BI-RADS 1-3) showed negative predictive values of 83.3-93.2% while the positive mammogram group (BI-RADS 4, 5) showed positive predictive values of 31.9% and 93.1%, respectively. There were 5 cases reported as BI-RADS 1, 2 but the pathological reports showed malignancy. We found the cases in this group had dense breast tissue which could explain the false negative results.
Conclusion: BI-RADS reporting in Songklanagarind Hospital has the same accuracy as other institutions. We should be careful of misdiagnoses due to dense breast tissue. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:07:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3b6907b79da648f4bbaeb35ebae08472 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2586-9981 2630-0559 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:07:08Z |
publishDate | 2011-08-01 |
publisher | Prince of Songkla University |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR) |
spelling | doaj.art-3b6907b79da648f4bbaeb35ebae084722022-12-22T00:42:02ZengPrince of Songkla UniversityJournal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)2586-99812630-05592011-08-01294155161333Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind HospitalPuwasit Trijaksang0Somkiat Sunpaweravong1Srila Samphao2Pattama Tana-anantarak3Rassamee Sangthong4Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Department of Radiology,Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS mammogram reports in Songklanagarind Hospital. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 2,064 mammogram reports was conducted and these were compared to the matching pathological reports. The reports were issued between January and December, 2005. Results: There were 828 mammograms for breast cancer screening and 1,236 cases for diagnosis of breast diseases. The negative mammogram group (Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System; BI-RADS 1-3) showed negative predictive values of 83.3-93.2% while the positive mammogram group (BI-RADS 4, 5) showed positive predictive values of 31.9% and 93.1%, respectively. There were 5 cases reported as BI-RADS 1, 2 but the pathological reports showed malignancy. We found the cases in this group had dense breast tissue which could explain the false negative results. Conclusion: BI-RADS reporting in Songklanagarind Hospital has the same accuracy as other institutions. We should be careful of misdiagnoses due to dense breast tissue.https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/319bi-radsbreast cancermammogramultrasound |
spellingShingle | Puwasit Trijaksang Somkiat Sunpaweravong Srila Samphao Pattama Tana-anantarak Rassamee Sangthong Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR) bi-rads breast cancer mammogram ultrasound |
title | Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital |
title_sort | diagnostic value of bi rads categorization in songklanagarind hospital |
topic | bi-rads breast cancer mammogram ultrasound |
url | https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puwasittrijaksang diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital AT somkiatsunpaweravong diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital AT srilasamphao diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital AT pattamatanaanantarak diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital AT rassameesangthong diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital |