Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS mammogram reports in Songklanagarind Hospital. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 2,064 mammogram reports was conducted and these were compared to the matching pathological reports. The reports were issued between January and December, 2005...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Puwasit Trijaksang, Somkiat Sunpaweravong, Srila Samphao, Pattama Tana-anantarak, Rassamee Sangthong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prince of Songkla University 2011-08-01
Series:Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/319
_version_ 1818198518067625984
author Puwasit Trijaksang
Somkiat Sunpaweravong
Srila Samphao
Pattama Tana-anantarak
Rassamee Sangthong
author_facet Puwasit Trijaksang
Somkiat Sunpaweravong
Srila Samphao
Pattama Tana-anantarak
Rassamee Sangthong
author_sort Puwasit Trijaksang
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS mammogram reports in Songklanagarind Hospital. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 2,064 mammogram reports was conducted and these were compared to the matching pathological reports. The reports were issued between January and December, 2005. Results: There were 828 mammograms for breast cancer screening and 1,236 cases for diagnosis of breast diseases. The negative mammogram group (Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System; BI-RADS 1-3) showed negative predictive values of 83.3-93.2% while the positive mammogram group (BI-RADS 4, 5) showed positive predictive values of 31.9% and 93.1%, respectively. There were 5 cases reported as BI-RADS 1, 2 but the pathological reports showed malignancy. We found the cases in this group had dense breast tissue which could explain the false negative results. Conclusion: BI-RADS reporting in Songklanagarind Hospital has the same accuracy as other institutions. We should be careful of misdiagnoses due to dense breast tissue.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:07:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b6907b79da648f4bbaeb35ebae08472
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2586-9981
2630-0559
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:07:08Z
publishDate 2011-08-01
publisher Prince of Songkla University
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
spelling doaj.art-3b6907b79da648f4bbaeb35ebae084722022-12-22T00:42:02ZengPrince of Songkla UniversityJournal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)2586-99812630-05592011-08-01294155161333Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind HospitalPuwasit Trijaksang0Somkiat Sunpaweravong1Srila Samphao2Pattama Tana-anantarak3Rassamee Sangthong4Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Department of Radiology,Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110,Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS mammogram reports in Songklanagarind Hospital. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 2,064 mammogram reports was conducted and these were compared to the matching pathological reports. The reports were issued between January and December, 2005. Results: There were 828 mammograms for breast cancer screening and 1,236 cases for diagnosis of breast diseases. The negative mammogram group (Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System; BI-RADS 1-3) showed negative predictive values of 83.3-93.2% while the positive mammogram group (BI-RADS 4, 5) showed positive predictive values of 31.9% and 93.1%, respectively. There were 5 cases reported as BI-RADS 1, 2 but the pathological reports showed malignancy. We found the cases in this group had dense breast tissue which could explain the false negative results. Conclusion: BI-RADS reporting in Songklanagarind Hospital has the same accuracy as other institutions. We should be careful of misdiagnoses due to dense breast tissue.https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/319bi-radsbreast cancermammogramultrasound
spellingShingle Puwasit Trijaksang
Somkiat Sunpaweravong
Srila Samphao
Pattama Tana-anantarak
Rassamee Sangthong
Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
bi-rads
breast cancer
mammogram
ultrasound
title Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_full Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_short Diagnostic Value of BI-RADS Categorization in Songklanagarind Hospital
title_sort diagnostic value of bi rads categorization in songklanagarind hospital
topic bi-rads
breast cancer
mammogram
ultrasound
url https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/319
work_keys_str_mv AT puwasittrijaksang diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital
AT somkiatsunpaweravong diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital
AT srilasamphao diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital
AT pattamatanaanantarak diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital
AT rassameesangthong diagnosticvalueofbiradscategorizationinsongklanagarindhospital