Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology

Muslim Philosopherson the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology Mohammad Saeedimehr* Received: 01/07/2019     |       Accepted: 05/09/2019 In different parts of Metaphysics, Aristotle presents different (and apparently, conflicting) views on the nature and subject matter of the discipline in que...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammad Saeedimehr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Qom 2019-09-01
Series:Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1464_24206712de41a94e6b19ae8804241857.pdf
_version_ 1797758153453993984
author Mohammad Saeedimehr
author_facet Mohammad Saeedimehr
author_sort Mohammad Saeedimehr
collection DOAJ
description Muslim Philosopherson the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology Mohammad Saeedimehr* Received: 01/07/2019     |       Accepted: 05/09/2019 In different parts of Metaphysics, Aristotle presents different (and apparently, conflicting) views on the nature and subject matter of the discipline in question. These different characterizations led to wide-ranging interpretations of the relation between metaphysics and philosophical theology. Muslim Philosophers adopted two different views. Al-Kindi and al-Farabi (in some of his works) endorsed the view that metaphysics is the same as theology as far as its subject matter is the First Cause (God) and it deals essentially with incorporeal entities. After Avicenna, however, a second view became dominant according to which metaphysics has a broader realm that embraces theology as its most noble part. The rationale behind this view is that the subject matter of metaphysics is “being qua being”, or unconditioned existent, in its broad sense so that philosophical theology can be taken as discussing some of the proper accidents of the unconditioned existent. This view requires that metaphysics cannot be a secular discipline and should be totally consistent with theology. It also provides us with a certain interpretation of what is usually called “Islamic philosophy.”   * Professor. Department of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran. ׀         saeedi@modares.ac.ir 🞕 Saeedimehr, M. (2019). Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 103۔ 118. doi: 10.22091/jptr.2019.4723.2201
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:25:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b7426aa73c442f1a3a0bdc81dc6d161
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-9791
2538-2500
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:25:54Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher University of Qom
record_format Article
series Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī
spelling doaj.art-3b7426aa73c442f1a3a0bdc81dc6d1612023-08-02T08:32:38ZengUniversity of QomPizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī1735-97912538-25002019-09-0121310411710.22091/jptr.2019.4723.22011464Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and TheologyMohammad Saeedimehr0* Professor. Department of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran. ׀ saeedi@modares.ac.irMuslim Philosopherson the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology Mohammad Saeedimehr* Received: 01/07/2019     |       Accepted: 05/09/2019 In different parts of Metaphysics, Aristotle presents different (and apparently, conflicting) views on the nature and subject matter of the discipline in question. These different characterizations led to wide-ranging interpretations of the relation between metaphysics and philosophical theology. Muslim Philosophers adopted two different views. Al-Kindi and al-Farabi (in some of his works) endorsed the view that metaphysics is the same as theology as far as its subject matter is the First Cause (God) and it deals essentially with incorporeal entities. After Avicenna, however, a second view became dominant according to which metaphysics has a broader realm that embraces theology as its most noble part. The rationale behind this view is that the subject matter of metaphysics is “being qua being”, or unconditioned existent, in its broad sense so that philosophical theology can be taken as discussing some of the proper accidents of the unconditioned existent. This view requires that metaphysics cannot be a secular discipline and should be totally consistent with theology. It also provides us with a certain interpretation of what is usually called “Islamic philosophy.”   * Professor. Department of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran. ׀         saeedi@modares.ac.ir 🞕 Saeedimehr, M. (2019). Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 103۔ 118. doi: 10.22091/jptr.2019.4723.2201http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1464_24206712de41a94e6b19ae8804241857.pdfmetaphysicstheologyontologyaristotleavicennamulla sadra
spellingShingle Mohammad Saeedimehr
Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology
Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī
metaphysics
theology
ontology
aristotle
avicenna
mulla sadra
title Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology
title_full Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology
title_fullStr Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology
title_full_unstemmed Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology
title_short Muslim Philosophers on the Relation between Metaphysics and Theology
title_sort muslim philosophers on the relation between metaphysics and theology
topic metaphysics
theology
ontology
aristotle
avicenna
mulla sadra
url http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1464_24206712de41a94e6b19ae8804241857.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadsaeedimehr muslimphilosophersontherelationbetweenmetaphysicsandtheology