Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies

Abstract Reliable tools for macrophage identification in mouse tissues are critical for studies investigating inflammatory and reparative responses. Transgenic reporter mice and anti-macrophage antibodies have been used as “specific pan-macrophage” markers in many studies; however, organ-specific pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bijun Chen, Ruoshui Li, Akihiko Kubota, Linda Alex, Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08278-x
_version_ 1818320970832674816
author Bijun Chen
Ruoshui Li
Akihiko Kubota
Linda Alex
Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis
author_facet Bijun Chen
Ruoshui Li
Akihiko Kubota
Linda Alex
Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis
author_sort Bijun Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Reliable tools for macrophage identification in mouse tissues are critical for studies investigating inflammatory and reparative responses. Transgenic reporter mice and anti-macrophage antibodies have been used as “specific pan-macrophage” markers in many studies; however, organ-specific patterns of expression and non-specific labeling of other cell types, such as fibroblasts, may limit their usefulness. Our study provides a systematic comparison of macrophage labeling patterns in normal and injured mouse tissues, using the CX3CR1 and CSF1R macrophage reporter lines and anti-macrophage antibodies. Moreover, we tested the specificity of macrophage antibodies using the fibroblast-specific PDGFR $$\mathrm{\alpha }$$ α reporter line. Mouse macrophages exhibit organ-specific differences in expression of macrophage markers. Hepatic macrophages are labeled for CSF1R, Mac2 and F4/80, but lack CX3CR1 expression, whereas in the lung, the CSF1R+/Mac2+/Mac3+ macrophage population is not labeled with F4/80. In the splenic red pulp, subpopulations of CSF1R+/F4/80+/Mac3+cells were labeled with Mac2, CX3CR1 and lysozyme M. In the kidney, Mac2, Mac3 and lysozyme M labeled a fraction of the CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ macrophages, but also stained tubular epithelial cells. In normal hearts, the majority of CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ cells were not detected with anti-macrophage antibodies. Myocardial infarction was associated with marked expansion of the CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ populations that peaked during the proliferative phase of cardiac repair, and also expressed Mac2, Mac3 and lysozyme M. In normal mouse tissues, a small fraction of cells labeled with anti-macrophage antibodies were identified as PDGFR $$\mathrm{\alpha }$$ α + fibroblasts, using a reporter system. The population of PDGFR $$\mathrm{\alpha }$$ α + cells expressing macrophage markers expanded following injury, likely reflecting emergence of cellular phenotypes with both fibroblast and macrophage characteristics. In conclusion, mouse macrophages exhibit remarkable heterogeneity. Selection of the most appropriate markers for identification of macrophages in mouse tissues is dependent on the organ and the pathologic condition studied.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:33:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b7ea66225014cfbbd3e63a02dbf7432
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:33:28Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-3b7ea66225014cfbbd3e63a02dbf74322022-12-21T23:50:47ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-03-0112111710.1038/s41598-022-08278-xIdentification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodiesBijun Chen0Ruoshui Li1Akihiko Kubota2Linda Alex3Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis4The Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of MedicineThe Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of MedicineThe Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of MedicineThe Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of MedicineThe Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of MedicineAbstract Reliable tools for macrophage identification in mouse tissues are critical for studies investigating inflammatory and reparative responses. Transgenic reporter mice and anti-macrophage antibodies have been used as “specific pan-macrophage” markers in many studies; however, organ-specific patterns of expression and non-specific labeling of other cell types, such as fibroblasts, may limit their usefulness. Our study provides a systematic comparison of macrophage labeling patterns in normal and injured mouse tissues, using the CX3CR1 and CSF1R macrophage reporter lines and anti-macrophage antibodies. Moreover, we tested the specificity of macrophage antibodies using the fibroblast-specific PDGFR $$\mathrm{\alpha }$$ α reporter line. Mouse macrophages exhibit organ-specific differences in expression of macrophage markers. Hepatic macrophages are labeled for CSF1R, Mac2 and F4/80, but lack CX3CR1 expression, whereas in the lung, the CSF1R+/Mac2+/Mac3+ macrophage population is not labeled with F4/80. In the splenic red pulp, subpopulations of CSF1R+/F4/80+/Mac3+cells were labeled with Mac2, CX3CR1 and lysozyme M. In the kidney, Mac2, Mac3 and lysozyme M labeled a fraction of the CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ macrophages, but also stained tubular epithelial cells. In normal hearts, the majority of CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ cells were not detected with anti-macrophage antibodies. Myocardial infarction was associated with marked expansion of the CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ populations that peaked during the proliferative phase of cardiac repair, and also expressed Mac2, Mac3 and lysozyme M. In normal mouse tissues, a small fraction of cells labeled with anti-macrophage antibodies were identified as PDGFR $$\mathrm{\alpha }$$ α + fibroblasts, using a reporter system. The population of PDGFR $$\mathrm{\alpha }$$ α + cells expressing macrophage markers expanded following injury, likely reflecting emergence of cellular phenotypes with both fibroblast and macrophage characteristics. In conclusion, mouse macrophages exhibit remarkable heterogeneity. Selection of the most appropriate markers for identification of macrophages in mouse tissues is dependent on the organ and the pathologic condition studied.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08278-x
spellingShingle Bijun Chen
Ruoshui Li
Akihiko Kubota
Linda Alex
Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis
Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies
Scientific Reports
title Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies
title_full Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies
title_fullStr Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies
title_full_unstemmed Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies
title_short Identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies
title_sort identification of macrophages in normal and injured mouse tissues using reporter lines and antibodies
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08278-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bijunchen identificationofmacrophagesinnormalandinjuredmousetissuesusingreporterlinesandantibodies
AT ruoshuili identificationofmacrophagesinnormalandinjuredmousetissuesusingreporterlinesandantibodies
AT akihikokubota identificationofmacrophagesinnormalandinjuredmousetissuesusingreporterlinesandantibodies
AT lindaalex identificationofmacrophagesinnormalandinjuredmousetissuesusingreporterlinesandantibodies
AT nikolaosgfrangogiannis identificationofmacrophagesinnormalandinjuredmousetissuesusingreporterlinesandantibodies