THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

This note is primarily a short report from Australia on a new bilateral FTA between Australia and the United States (AUSFTA). While it conveys the experience of a very small country, at the other end of the earth, I want to use this example for what it says about the increasingly complex and fluid n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christopher Arup
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University Open Publishing 2004-01-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
Online Access:https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3059
_version_ 1797230107757117440
author Christopher Arup
author_facet Christopher Arup
author_sort Christopher Arup
collection DOAJ
description This note is primarily a short report from Australia on a new bilateral FTA between Australia and the United States (AUSFTA). While it conveys the experience of a very small country, at the other end of the earth, I want to use this example for what it says about the increasingly complex and fluid nature of law making in trans-national commercial law fields like foreign investment and intellectual property. Australia has been a strong supporter of the multilateral trade agreements at the WTO.1 AUSFTA is not Australia’ first bilateral FTA, but it is significant because the partner this time is the strongest of the developed countries. In many ways, the constituents of Australia’s commercial law already reflect the Washington policy consensus. Nonetheless, this agreement with the United States lays down detailed requirements for changes to Australian domestic law. The requirements are not simply a direct translation of United States law. They represent another building block in an edifice of global economic law.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:23:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b92d509303a4f27bea44320acaa9732
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1459-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:23:14Z
publishDate 2004-01-01
publisher Aalborg University Open Publishing
record_format Article
series Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
spelling doaj.art-3b92d509303a4f27bea44320acaa97322024-04-02T07:18:01ZengAalborg University Open PublishingNordic Journal of Commercial Law1459-96862004-01-012THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENTChristopher ArupThis note is primarily a short report from Australia on a new bilateral FTA between Australia and the United States (AUSFTA). While it conveys the experience of a very small country, at the other end of the earth, I want to use this example for what it says about the increasingly complex and fluid nature of law making in trans-national commercial law fields like foreign investment and intellectual property. Australia has been a strong supporter of the multilateral trade agreements at the WTO.1 AUSFTA is not Australia’ first bilateral FTA, but it is significant because the partner this time is the strongest of the developed countries. In many ways, the constituents of Australia’s commercial law already reflect the Washington policy consensus. Nonetheless, this agreement with the United States lays down detailed requirements for changes to Australian domestic law. The requirements are not simply a direct translation of United States law. They represent another building block in an edifice of global economic law.https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3059
spellingShingle Christopher Arup
THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
title THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
title_full THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
title_fullStr THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
title_full_unstemmed THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
title_short THE 2004 UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
title_sort 2004 united states australia free trade agreement
url https://130.225.53.24/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3059
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherarup the2004unitedstatesaustraliafreetradeagreement
AT christopherarup 2004unitedstatesaustraliafreetradeagreement