Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)

Fifty years after the first description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), none of the many positive drug studies in animal models have been confirmed in clinical trials and translated into clinical practice. This bleak outcome of so many animal experiments shows how difficult it is to m...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы: Stefan Uhlig, Wolfgang M. Kuebler
Формат: Статья
Язык:English
Опубликовано: Wiley 2018-04-01
Серии:Pulmonary Circulation
Online-ссылка:https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894018766737
_version_ 1828472671445188608
author Stefan Uhlig
Wolfgang M. Kuebler
author_facet Stefan Uhlig
Wolfgang M. Kuebler
author_sort Stefan Uhlig
collection DOAJ
description Fifty years after the first description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), none of the many positive drug studies in animal models have been confirmed in clinical trials and translated into clinical practice. This bleak outcome of so many animal experiments shows how difficult it is to model ARDS. Lungs from patients are characterized by hyperinflammation, permeability edema, and hypoxemia; accordingly, this is what most models aim to reproduce. However, in animal models it is very easy to cause inflammation in the lungs, but difficult to cause hypoxemia. Often – and not unlike in patients – models with hypoxemia are accompanied by cardiovascular failure that necessitates fluid support and ventilation, raising the question as to the role of intensive care measures in models of ARDS. In our opinion, there are two major arguments in favor of modelling intensive care medicine in models of ARDS: (1) preventing death from shock; and (2) modelling ventilation and other ICU measures as a second hit. The preferable predictive endpoints in any model of ARDS remain unclear. At present, the best recommendation is to use endpoints that can be compared across studies (i.e. PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, compliance, wet-to-dry weight ratio) rather than percentage data. Another important and often overlooked issue is the fact that the thermoneutral environmental temperatures for mice and rats are 30℃ and 28℃, respectively; thus, at room temperature (20–22℃) they suffer from cold stress with the associated significant metabolic changes. While, by definition, any model is an abstraction, we suggest that clinically relevant models of ARDS will have to closer recapitulate important properties of the disease while taking into account species-specific confounders.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:33:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b94e362cf1e46fc939c2054b4fb80ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8940
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:33:11Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Circulation
spelling doaj.art-3b94e362cf1e46fc939c2054b4fb80ff2022-12-22T01:19:22ZengWileyPulmonary Circulation2045-89402018-04-01810.1177/2045894018766737Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)Stefan Uhlig0Wolfgang M. KueblerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, GermanyFifty years after the first description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), none of the many positive drug studies in animal models have been confirmed in clinical trials and translated into clinical practice. This bleak outcome of so many animal experiments shows how difficult it is to model ARDS. Lungs from patients are characterized by hyperinflammation, permeability edema, and hypoxemia; accordingly, this is what most models aim to reproduce. However, in animal models it is very easy to cause inflammation in the lungs, but difficult to cause hypoxemia. Often – and not unlike in patients – models with hypoxemia are accompanied by cardiovascular failure that necessitates fluid support and ventilation, raising the question as to the role of intensive care measures in models of ARDS. In our opinion, there are two major arguments in favor of modelling intensive care medicine in models of ARDS: (1) preventing death from shock; and (2) modelling ventilation and other ICU measures as a second hit. The preferable predictive endpoints in any model of ARDS remain unclear. At present, the best recommendation is to use endpoints that can be compared across studies (i.e. PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, compliance, wet-to-dry weight ratio) rather than percentage data. Another important and often overlooked issue is the fact that the thermoneutral environmental temperatures for mice and rats are 30℃ and 28℃, respectively; thus, at room temperature (20–22℃) they suffer from cold stress with the associated significant metabolic changes. While, by definition, any model is an abstraction, we suggest that clinically relevant models of ARDS will have to closer recapitulate important properties of the disease while taking into account species-specific confounders.https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894018766737
spellingShingle Stefan Uhlig
Wolfgang M. Kuebler
Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)
Pulmonary Circulation
title Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)
title_full Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)
title_fullStr Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)
title_full_unstemmed Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)
title_short Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series)
title_sort difficulties in modelling ards 2017 grover conference series
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894018766737
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanuhlig difficultiesinmodellingards2017groverconferenceseries
AT wolfgangmkuebler difficultiesinmodellingards2017groverconferenceseries