The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it Matters
In recent years computer technologies and digital devices have become ubiquitous in all facets of human existence, including crime and deviant behavior. Various forms of criminality have emerged in which technical entities play a substantial role. It can be argued that such a development urges crimi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Extreme Anthropology Research Network
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Extreme Anthropology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.uio.no/JEA/article/view/6895 |
_version_ | 1811276265982787584 |
---|---|
author | Wytske van der Wagen |
author_facet | Wytske van der Wagen |
author_sort | Wytske van der Wagen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In recent years computer technologies and digital devices have become ubiquitous in all facets of human existence, including crime and deviant behavior. Various forms of criminality have emerged in which technical entities play a substantial role. It can be argued that such a development urges criminologists and anthropologists to draw more attention to the significance of things in crime. Latour’s (2005) actor-network theory (ANT), which considers non-human entities as active participants of the social, could be a useful approach for extending our analytical focus to the non-human. The article will not only asses why, but also how we can apply ANT as a more-than-human methodology in qualitative research, by discussing three ANT-based methodological principles: ‘follow the tool’, ‘follow the hybrid’ and ‘follow the network.’ In this scope, this article draws on earlier conducted qualitative ANT case studies on different forms of high-tech cybercrime. In a more general vein, the article aims to show that innovations in qualitative research methods can be also informed by theory. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:54:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3b9cce15f4f8403faa627d3ae797cab9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2535-3241 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:54:34Z |
publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
publisher | Extreme Anthropology Research Network |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Extreme Anthropology |
spelling | doaj.art-3b9cce15f4f8403faa627d3ae797cab92022-12-22T03:11:35ZengExtreme Anthropology Research NetworkJournal of Extreme Anthropology2535-32412019-06-013110.5617/jea.6895The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it MattersWytske van der Wagen0Assistant Professor at Erasmus University, Department of CriminologyIn recent years computer technologies and digital devices have become ubiquitous in all facets of human existence, including crime and deviant behavior. Various forms of criminality have emerged in which technical entities play a substantial role. It can be argued that such a development urges criminologists and anthropologists to draw more attention to the significance of things in crime. Latour’s (2005) actor-network theory (ANT), which considers non-human entities as active participants of the social, could be a useful approach for extending our analytical focus to the non-human. The article will not only asses why, but also how we can apply ANT as a more-than-human methodology in qualitative research, by discussing three ANT-based methodological principles: ‘follow the tool’, ‘follow the hybrid’ and ‘follow the network.’ In this scope, this article draws on earlier conducted qualitative ANT case studies on different forms of high-tech cybercrime. In a more general vein, the article aims to show that innovations in qualitative research methods can be also informed by theory.https://journals.uio.no/JEA/article/view/6895actor-network theorynon-human agencycybercrimequalitative research methodsethnography |
spellingShingle | Wytske van der Wagen The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it Matters Journal of Extreme Anthropology actor-network theory non-human agency cybercrime qualitative research methods ethnography |
title | The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it Matters |
title_full | The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it Matters |
title_fullStr | The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it Matters |
title_full_unstemmed | The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it Matters |
title_short | The Significance of ‘Things’ in Cybercrime: How to Apply Actor-network Theory in (Cyber)criminological Research and Why it Matters |
title_sort | significance of things in cybercrime how to apply actor network theory in cyber criminological research and why it matters |
topic | actor-network theory non-human agency cybercrime qualitative research methods ethnography |
url | https://journals.uio.no/JEA/article/view/6895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wytskevanderwagen thesignificanceofthingsincybercrimehowtoapplyactornetworktheoryincybercriminologicalresearchandwhyitmatters AT wytskevanderwagen significanceofthingsincybercrimehowtoapplyactornetworktheoryincybercriminologicalresearchandwhyitmatters |