Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction?
Indexation of credit to inflation (ex-post) is a unique legal practice in Iceland based on valorism theory on money vs. nominalism. Two rulings issued in 2014 by the EFTA Court try to clarify the legality and fairness of this particular price-variation clause under the European Economic Area consum...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bucharest University of Economic Studies
2016-10-01
|
| Series: | Juridical Tribune |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v2/1%20Mendez.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797219041454063616 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Elvira Mendez-Pinedo |
| author_facet | M. Elvira Mendez-Pinedo |
| author_sort | M. Elvira Mendez-Pinedo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Indexation of credit to inflation (ex-post) is a unique legal practice in Iceland based on valorism theory on money vs. nominalism. Two rulings issued in 2014 by the EFTA Court try to clarify the legality and fairness of this particular price-variation clause
under the European Economic Area consumer credit acquis. The study summarizes the rulings and analyses critically the interpretation provided by the court. It argues that the
judgements defy the logic of non-contradiction since indexation of credit proves to be an impossible oxymoron under EU/EEA law. The results are confusing. On one hand, cost of credit and usury practices tend to fall outside the scope of European harmonisation (provided disclosure obligation of cost of credit and transparency ex-ante are respected). A fairness control is thus dependent on national and case circumstances to be assessed by domestic courts. On the other hand, European rules also impose with no derogations that the cost of indexation of credit to inflation is disclosed in a transparent way and calculated
ex-ante. The paradox is there. Since indexation of credit operates ex-post on the basis of real inflation, it is impossible to disclose ex-ante in a transparent way. The findings of the study help to understand the situation of impasse in Iceland. Without a clear interpretation from the EFTA Court, the saga has continued at national level and will probably head for a second round of assessment at European level. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:27:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3baf0eec4ae2490981b1d425beec0acd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2247-7195 2248-0382 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:27:20Z |
| publishDate | 2016-10-01 |
| publisher | Bucharest University of Economic Studies |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Juridical Tribune |
| spelling | doaj.art-3baf0eec4ae2490981b1d425beec0acd2024-04-08T07:42:59ZengBucharest University of Economic StudiesJuridical Tribune2247-71952248-03822016-10-016Special739Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction? M. Elvira Mendez-Pinedo0School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, University of Iceland, Indexation of credit to inflation (ex-post) is a unique legal practice in Iceland based on valorism theory on money vs. nominalism. Two rulings issued in 2014 by the EFTA Court try to clarify the legality and fairness of this particular price-variation clause under the European Economic Area consumer credit acquis. The study summarizes the rulings and analyses critically the interpretation provided by the court. It argues that the judgements defy the logic of non-contradiction since indexation of credit proves to be an impossible oxymoron under EU/EEA law. The results are confusing. On one hand, cost of credit and usury practices tend to fall outside the scope of European harmonisation (provided disclosure obligation of cost of credit and transparency ex-ante are respected). A fairness control is thus dependent on national and case circumstances to be assessed by domestic courts. On the other hand, European rules also impose with no derogations that the cost of indexation of credit to inflation is disclosed in a transparent way and calculated ex-ante. The paradox is there. Since indexation of credit operates ex-post on the basis of real inflation, it is impossible to disclose ex-ante in a transparent way. The findings of the study help to understand the situation of impasse in Iceland. Without a clear interpretation from the EFTA Court, the saga has continued at national level and will probably head for a second round of assessment at European level.http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v2/1%20Mendez.pdfEFTA CourtIceland; indexation of credit; fairness; information and transparency; consumer protection.Iceland; indexation of credit; fairness; information and transparencyIcelandindexation of creditfairnessinformation and transparencyconsumer protection |
| spellingShingle | M. Elvira Mendez-Pinedo Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction? Juridical Tribune EFTA Court Iceland; indexation of credit; fairness; information and transparency; consumer protection. Iceland; indexation of credit; fairness; information and transparency Iceland indexation of credit fairness information and transparency consumer protection |
| title | Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction? |
| title_full | Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction? |
| title_fullStr | Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction? |
| title_short | Iceland, the EFTA Court and the indexation of credit to inflation: operating in nature ex-post but need to calculate and disclose ex-ante. A law of contradiction? |
| title_sort | iceland the efta court and the indexation of credit to inflation operating in nature ex post but need to calculate and disclose ex ante a law of contradiction |
| topic | EFTA Court Iceland; indexation of credit; fairness; information and transparency; consumer protection. Iceland; indexation of credit; fairness; information and transparency Iceland indexation of credit fairness information and transparency consumer protection |
| url | http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v2/1%20Mendez.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT melviramendezpinedo icelandtheeftacourtandtheindexationofcredittoinflationoperatinginnatureexpostbutneedtocalculateanddiscloseexantealawofcontradiction |