Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation.
Humans everywhere cooperate in groups to achieve benefits not attainable by individuals. Individual effort is often not automatically tied to a proportionate share of group benefits. This decoupling allows for free-riding, a strategy that (absent countermeasures) outcompetes cooperation. Empirically...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4404356?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1818422653661216768 |
|---|---|
| author | Max M Krasnow Andrew W Delton Leda Cosmides John Tooby |
| author_facet | Max M Krasnow Andrew W Delton Leda Cosmides John Tooby |
| author_sort | Max M Krasnow |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Humans everywhere cooperate in groups to achieve benefits not attainable by individuals. Individual effort is often not automatically tied to a proportionate share of group benefits. This decoupling allows for free-riding, a strategy that (absent countermeasures) outcompetes cooperation. Empirically and formally, punishment potentially solves the evolutionary puzzle of group cooperation. Nevertheless, standard analyses appear to show that punishment alone is insufficient, because second-order free riders (those who cooperate but do not punish) can be shown to outcompete punishers. Consequently, many have concluded that other processes, such as cultural or genetic group selection, are required. Here, we present a series of agent-based simulations that show that group cooperation sustained by punishment easily evolves by individual selection when you introduce into standard models more biologically plausible assumptions about the social ecology and psychology of ancestral humans. We relax three unrealistic assumptions of past models. First, past models assume all punishers must punish every act of free riding in their group. We instead allow punishment to be probabilistic, meaning punishers can evolve to only punish some free riders some of the time. This drastically lowers the cost of punishment as group size increases. Second, most models unrealistically do not allow punishment to recruit labor; punishment merely reduces the punished agent's fitness. We instead realistically allow punished free riders to cooperate in the future to avoid punishment. Third, past models usually restrict agents to interact in a single group their entire lives. We instead introduce realistic social ecologies in which agents participate in multiple, partially overlapping groups. Because of this, punitive tendencies are more expressed and therefore more exposed to natural selection. These three moves toward greater model realism reveal that punishment and cooperation easily evolve by direct selection--even in sizeable groups. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T13:29:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3bb36bb081884fafb8e477d8f6dd6a47 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T13:29:41Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-3bb36bb081884fafb8e477d8f6dd6a472022-12-21T22:59:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01104e012456110.1371/journal.pone.0124561Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation.Max M KrasnowAndrew W DeltonLeda CosmidesJohn ToobyHumans everywhere cooperate in groups to achieve benefits not attainable by individuals. Individual effort is often not automatically tied to a proportionate share of group benefits. This decoupling allows for free-riding, a strategy that (absent countermeasures) outcompetes cooperation. Empirically and formally, punishment potentially solves the evolutionary puzzle of group cooperation. Nevertheless, standard analyses appear to show that punishment alone is insufficient, because second-order free riders (those who cooperate but do not punish) can be shown to outcompete punishers. Consequently, many have concluded that other processes, such as cultural or genetic group selection, are required. Here, we present a series of agent-based simulations that show that group cooperation sustained by punishment easily evolves by individual selection when you introduce into standard models more biologically plausible assumptions about the social ecology and psychology of ancestral humans. We relax three unrealistic assumptions of past models. First, past models assume all punishers must punish every act of free riding in their group. We instead allow punishment to be probabilistic, meaning punishers can evolve to only punish some free riders some of the time. This drastically lowers the cost of punishment as group size increases. Second, most models unrealistically do not allow punishment to recruit labor; punishment merely reduces the punished agent's fitness. We instead realistically allow punished free riders to cooperate in the future to avoid punishment. Third, past models usually restrict agents to interact in a single group their entire lives. We instead introduce realistic social ecologies in which agents participate in multiple, partially overlapping groups. Because of this, punitive tendencies are more expressed and therefore more exposed to natural selection. These three moves toward greater model realism reveal that punishment and cooperation easily evolve by direct selection--even in sizeable groups.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4404356?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Max M Krasnow Andrew W Delton Leda Cosmides John Tooby Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation. PLoS ONE |
| title | Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation. |
| title_full | Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation. |
| title_fullStr | Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation. |
| title_short | Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation. |
| title_sort | group cooperation without group selection modest punishment can recruit much cooperation |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4404356?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maxmkrasnow groupcooperationwithoutgroupselectionmodestpunishmentcanrecruitmuchcooperation AT andrewwdelton groupcooperationwithoutgroupselectionmodestpunishmentcanrecruitmuchcooperation AT ledacosmides groupcooperationwithoutgroupselectionmodestpunishmentcanrecruitmuchcooperation AT johntooby groupcooperationwithoutgroupselectionmodestpunishmentcanrecruitmuchcooperation |