Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial

Background: With the increase in antibiotic resistance, the success rate of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication therapy has declined in recent years. Vonoprazan–amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported to be a promising regimen. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of VA d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaolei Wang, Guigen Teng, Xinhong Dong, Yun Dai, Weihong Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-08-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231190976
_version_ 1797731007911165952
author Xiaolei Wang
Guigen Teng
Xinhong Dong
Yun Dai
Weihong Wang
author_facet Xiaolei Wang
Guigen Teng
Xinhong Dong
Yun Dai
Weihong Wang
author_sort Xiaolei Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background: With the increase in antibiotic resistance, the success rate of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication therapy has declined in recent years. Vonoprazan–amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported to be a promising regimen. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of VA dual therapy and bismuth quadruple therapy containing amoxicillin and clarithromycin for H. pylori first-line eradication, and to further analyze the effects of clarithromycin resistance on eradication rate. Design: This study was a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Treatment-naïve H. pylori -infected patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to the VA group (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 750 mg four times daily, for 14 days) or the RBAC group (rabeprazole 10 mg, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, for 14 days). H. pylori clarithromycin resistance and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms were detected with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. The eradication rates and adverse events were analyzed. Results: A total of 151 patients were enrolled. The intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (mITT), and per-protocol (PP) eradication rates and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were 94.6% (86.0–98.3%), 98.6% (91.3–99.9%), and 98.5% (90.9–99.9%) for VA group and 87.0% (77.0–93.3%), 91.8% (82.3–96.6%), and 93% (83.7–97.4%) for RBAC group. The eradication rate of the VA group was noninferior to the RBAC group in ITT, mITT, and PP analyses ( p  < 0.0001). In patients infected with strains of clarithromycin resistance point mutation, the eradication rate of the RBAC group decreased to lower than 90%, but the difference from the VA group did not achieve statistical significance (ITT eradication rate: 81.5% in the RBAC group and 96.2% in the VA group, p  = 0.192). The incidence of adverse events in the VA group was 39.2%, which was significantly lower than that in the RBAC group (79.2%, p  = 0.000). Conclusion: The efficacy of VA dual therapy is noninferior to RBAC in H. pylori first-line eradication, with fewer adverse reactions. Registration: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052550) on 30 October 2021.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:52:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3bc16f40c0ee495b891de9dc9ebe6d54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-2848
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:52:17Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-3bc16f40c0ee495b891de9dc9ebe6d542023-08-31T05:33:44ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology1756-28482023-08-011610.1177/17562848231190976Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trialXiaolei WangGuigen TengXinhong DongYun DaiWeihong WangBackground: With the increase in antibiotic resistance, the success rate of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication therapy has declined in recent years. Vonoprazan–amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported to be a promising regimen. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of VA dual therapy and bismuth quadruple therapy containing amoxicillin and clarithromycin for H. pylori first-line eradication, and to further analyze the effects of clarithromycin resistance on eradication rate. Design: This study was a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Treatment-naïve H. pylori -infected patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to the VA group (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 750 mg four times daily, for 14 days) or the RBAC group (rabeprazole 10 mg, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, for 14 days). H. pylori clarithromycin resistance and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms were detected with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. The eradication rates and adverse events were analyzed. Results: A total of 151 patients were enrolled. The intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (mITT), and per-protocol (PP) eradication rates and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were 94.6% (86.0–98.3%), 98.6% (91.3–99.9%), and 98.5% (90.9–99.9%) for VA group and 87.0% (77.0–93.3%), 91.8% (82.3–96.6%), and 93% (83.7–97.4%) for RBAC group. The eradication rate of the VA group was noninferior to the RBAC group in ITT, mITT, and PP analyses ( p  < 0.0001). In patients infected with strains of clarithromycin resistance point mutation, the eradication rate of the RBAC group decreased to lower than 90%, but the difference from the VA group did not achieve statistical significance (ITT eradication rate: 81.5% in the RBAC group and 96.2% in the VA group, p  = 0.192). The incidence of adverse events in the VA group was 39.2%, which was significantly lower than that in the RBAC group (79.2%, p  = 0.000). Conclusion: The efficacy of VA dual therapy is noninferior to RBAC in H. pylori first-line eradication, with fewer adverse reactions. Registration: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052550) on 30 October 2021.https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231190976
spellingShingle Xiaolei Wang
Guigen Teng
Xinhong Dong
Yun Dai
Weihong Wang
Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
title Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy for first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of vonoprazan amoxicillin dual therapy for first line treatment a single center randomized controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231190976
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoleiwang efficacyandsafetyofvonoprazanamoxicillindualtherapyforfirstlinetreatmentasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guigenteng efficacyandsafetyofvonoprazanamoxicillindualtherapyforfirstlinetreatmentasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xinhongdong efficacyandsafetyofvonoprazanamoxicillindualtherapyforfirstlinetreatmentasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yundai efficacyandsafetyofvonoprazanamoxicillindualtherapyforfirstlinetreatmentasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weihongwang efficacyandsafetyofvonoprazanamoxicillindualtherapyforfirstlinetreatmentasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial