Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth

Abstract Background Lower-risk substance use guidelines (LRSUGs) are an evidence-based harm reduction strategy used to provide information to people who use drugs so they can reduce harms associated with substance use. Objectives This study aimed to identify LRSUGs accessible to youth and to charact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakkaery R. Moebes, Kiffer G. Card, Brett Koenig, Cecilia Benoit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00516-3
_version_ 1797865527243177984
author Zakkaery R. Moebes
Kiffer G. Card
Brett Koenig
Cecilia Benoit
author_facet Zakkaery R. Moebes
Kiffer G. Card
Brett Koenig
Cecilia Benoit
author_sort Zakkaery R. Moebes
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Lower-risk substance use guidelines (LRSUGs) are an evidence-based harm reduction strategy used to provide information to people who use drugs so they can reduce harms associated with substance use. Objectives This study aimed to identify LRSUGs accessible to youth and to characterize the recommendations within these guidelines. The overall goal is to identify gaps in current LRSUGs and to inform researchers and policymakers of the kinds of health information youth can access. Methods We conducted a digital assessment using the Google search engine to identify LRSUGs that could be identified by youth when searching for official sources of information related to commonly used substances, including cannabis, caffeine, alcohol, hallucinogens, prescription opioids, nicotine, and/or prescription stimulants. LRSUGs were coded and data were extracted from them to identify gaps. Results One hundred thirty LRSUGs were identified; most focused on alcohol (n = 40, 31%), cannabis (n = 30, 23%), and caffeine (n = 21, 16%). LRSUGs provided recommendations about dosing (n = 108, 83%), frequency of use (n = 72, 55%), and when to use (n = 86, 66%). Most LRSUGs were published by health (n = 51, 39%) and third-sector organizations (n = 41, 32%), followed by provincial/state (n = 18, 14%), government (n = 14, 11%), municipal (n = 4, 3%), and academic (n = 2, 2%) sources. Only 16% (n = 21) of LRSUGs were youth-specific and one-quarter (n = 32, 25%) of LRSUGs provided gender-specific recommendations. Most guidelines featured information on short (n = 76, 58%) and long-term (n = 69, 53%) negative effectives and positive effects of substances (n = 56, 43%). Less than half (n = 50, 38%) of LRSUGs cited evidence in support of the information they provided. Conclusions We identified several areas in the current LRSUGs for youth that need to be addressed. Among the gaps are a lack of LRSUGs developed specifically for youth, a lack of youth engagement in developing harm reduction strategies centered around them, and a lack of evidence-based LRSUGs. Youth-oriented, evidence-based LRSUGs are needed to better support youth who use substances and help them manage the negative effects of substance use.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:10:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3bcfc5c36c0340649e87b085c01eb76f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1747-597X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:10:37Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
spelling doaj.art-3bcfc5c36c0340649e87b085c01eb76f2023-03-22T10:26:24ZengBMCSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy1747-597X2023-02-0118111210.1186/s13011-023-00516-3Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youthZakkaery R. Moebes0Kiffer G. Card1Brett Koenig2Cecilia Benoit3Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of VictoriaCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of VictoriaCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of VictoriaCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of VictoriaAbstract Background Lower-risk substance use guidelines (LRSUGs) are an evidence-based harm reduction strategy used to provide information to people who use drugs so they can reduce harms associated with substance use. Objectives This study aimed to identify LRSUGs accessible to youth and to characterize the recommendations within these guidelines. The overall goal is to identify gaps in current LRSUGs and to inform researchers and policymakers of the kinds of health information youth can access. Methods We conducted a digital assessment using the Google search engine to identify LRSUGs that could be identified by youth when searching for official sources of information related to commonly used substances, including cannabis, caffeine, alcohol, hallucinogens, prescription opioids, nicotine, and/or prescription stimulants. LRSUGs were coded and data were extracted from them to identify gaps. Results One hundred thirty LRSUGs were identified; most focused on alcohol (n = 40, 31%), cannabis (n = 30, 23%), and caffeine (n = 21, 16%). LRSUGs provided recommendations about dosing (n = 108, 83%), frequency of use (n = 72, 55%), and when to use (n = 86, 66%). Most LRSUGs were published by health (n = 51, 39%) and third-sector organizations (n = 41, 32%), followed by provincial/state (n = 18, 14%), government (n = 14, 11%), municipal (n = 4, 3%), and academic (n = 2, 2%) sources. Only 16% (n = 21) of LRSUGs were youth-specific and one-quarter (n = 32, 25%) of LRSUGs provided gender-specific recommendations. Most guidelines featured information on short (n = 76, 58%) and long-term (n = 69, 53%) negative effectives and positive effects of substances (n = 56, 43%). Less than half (n = 50, 38%) of LRSUGs cited evidence in support of the information they provided. Conclusions We identified several areas in the current LRSUGs for youth that need to be addressed. Among the gaps are a lack of LRSUGs developed specifically for youth, a lack of youth engagement in developing harm reduction strategies centered around them, and a lack of evidence-based LRSUGs. Youth-oriented, evidence-based LRSUGs are needed to better support youth who use substances and help them manage the negative effects of substance use.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00516-3Substance useYouthGuidelinesDigital assessmentHarm reduction
spellingShingle Zakkaery R. Moebes
Kiffer G. Card
Brett Koenig
Cecilia Benoit
Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Substance use
Youth
Guidelines
Digital assessment
Harm reduction
title Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth
title_full Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth
title_fullStr Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth
title_full_unstemmed Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth
title_short Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth
title_sort lower risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth
topic Substance use
Youth
Guidelines
Digital assessment
Harm reduction
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00516-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zakkaeryrmoebes lowerrisksubstanceuseguidelinesaccessiblebyyouth
AT kiffergcard lowerrisksubstanceuseguidelinesaccessiblebyyouth
AT brettkoenig lowerrisksubstanceuseguidelinesaccessiblebyyouth
AT ceciliabenoit lowerrisksubstanceuseguidelinesaccessiblebyyouth