Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images

Abstract Discriminating between object categories (e.g., conspecifics, food, potential predators) is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems. We examined whether a similar hierarchical organization in the ventral stream that operates for processing faces in monkeys also exists in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William Clark, Matthew Chilcott, Amir Azizi, Roland Pusch, Kate Perry, Michael Colombo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04559-z
_version_ 1818753165598654464
author William Clark
Matthew Chilcott
Amir Azizi
Roland Pusch
Kate Perry
Michael Colombo
author_facet William Clark
Matthew Chilcott
Amir Azizi
Roland Pusch
Kate Perry
Michael Colombo
author_sort William Clark
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Discriminating between object categories (e.g., conspecifics, food, potential predators) is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems. We examined whether a similar hierarchical organization in the ventral stream that operates for processing faces in monkeys also exists in the avian visual system. We performed electrophysiological recordings from the pigeon Wulst of the thalamofugal pathway, in addition to the entopallium (ENTO) and mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL) of the tectofugal pathway, while pigeons viewed images of faces, scrambled controls, and sine gratings. A greater proportion of MVL neurons fired to the stimuli, and linear discriminant analysis revealed that the population response of MVL neurons distinguished between the stimuli with greater capacity than ENTO and Wulst neurons. While MVL neurons displayed the greatest response selectivity, in contrast to the primate system no neurons were strongly face-selective and some responded best to the scrambled images. These findings suggest that MVL is primarily involved in processing the local features of images, much like the early visual cortex.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T05:03:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3bd86982bb5743e0b8997d7ee047da3a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T05:03:01Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-3bd86982bb5743e0b8997d7ee047da3a2022-12-21T21:20:05ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-01-0112111210.1038/s41598-021-04559-zNeurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating imagesWilliam Clark0Matthew Chilcott1Amir Azizi2Roland Pusch3Kate Perry4Michael Colombo5Department of Psychology, University of OtagoDepartment of Physics, University of OtagoDepartment of Systems Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII)Department of Biopsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University BochumDepartment of Psychology, University of OtagoDepartment of Psychology, University of OtagoAbstract Discriminating between object categories (e.g., conspecifics, food, potential predators) is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems. We examined whether a similar hierarchical organization in the ventral stream that operates for processing faces in monkeys also exists in the avian visual system. We performed electrophysiological recordings from the pigeon Wulst of the thalamofugal pathway, in addition to the entopallium (ENTO) and mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL) of the tectofugal pathway, while pigeons viewed images of faces, scrambled controls, and sine gratings. A greater proportion of MVL neurons fired to the stimuli, and linear discriminant analysis revealed that the population response of MVL neurons distinguished between the stimuli with greater capacity than ENTO and Wulst neurons. While MVL neurons displayed the greatest response selectivity, in contrast to the primate system no neurons were strongly face-selective and some responded best to the scrambled images. These findings suggest that MVL is primarily involved in processing the local features of images, much like the early visual cortex.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04559-z
spellingShingle William Clark
Matthew Chilcott
Amir Azizi
Roland Pusch
Kate Perry
Michael Colombo
Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images
Scientific Reports
title Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images
title_full Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images
title_fullStr Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images
title_full_unstemmed Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images
title_short Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images
title_sort neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces scrambled faces and sine grating images
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04559-z
work_keys_str_mv AT williamclark neuronsinthepigeonvisualnetworkdiscriminatebetweenfacesscrambledfacesandsinegratingimages
AT matthewchilcott neuronsinthepigeonvisualnetworkdiscriminatebetweenfacesscrambledfacesandsinegratingimages
AT amirazizi neuronsinthepigeonvisualnetworkdiscriminatebetweenfacesscrambledfacesandsinegratingimages
AT rolandpusch neuronsinthepigeonvisualnetworkdiscriminatebetweenfacesscrambledfacesandsinegratingimages
AT kateperry neuronsinthepigeonvisualnetworkdiscriminatebetweenfacesscrambledfacesandsinegratingimages
AT michaelcolombo neuronsinthepigeonvisualnetworkdiscriminatebetweenfacesscrambledfacesandsinegratingimages