Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures study

Abstract Background Inflammatory markers have been associated with depression and anxiety disorder in adolescents. Less is known about the association between inflammation and subclinical symptoms in the form of psychological distress. We investigated prevalence of psychological distress and examine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonas Linkas, Luai Awad Ahmed, Gabor Csifcsak, Nina Emaus, Anne-Sofie Furberg, Guri Grimnes, Gunn Pettersen, Kamilla Rognmo, Tore Christoffersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-03-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00779-8
_version_ 1818315658051452928
author Jonas Linkas
Luai Awad Ahmed
Gabor Csifcsak
Nina Emaus
Anne-Sofie Furberg
Guri Grimnes
Gunn Pettersen
Kamilla Rognmo
Tore Christoffersen
author_facet Jonas Linkas
Luai Awad Ahmed
Gabor Csifcsak
Nina Emaus
Anne-Sofie Furberg
Guri Grimnes
Gunn Pettersen
Kamilla Rognmo
Tore Christoffersen
author_sort Jonas Linkas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Inflammatory markers have been associated with depression and anxiety disorder in adolescents. Less is known about the association between inflammation and subclinical symptoms in the form of psychological distress. We investigated prevalence of psychological distress and examined the associations between common pro-inflammatory markers and psychological distress in an adolescent population sample. Methods The study was based on data from 458 girls and 473 boys aged 15–17 years from the Fit Futures Study, a large-scale study on adolescent health, conducted in Northern Norway. Psychological distress was measured with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-10). Serum-levels of the following low-grade inflammatory markers were measured: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-α), tumor necrosis factor alpha variant 1 (TRANCE) and tumor necrosis factor alpha variant 2 (TWEAK). Associations between quartiles of inflammatory markers and HSCL-10 were examined by logistic regression and adjusted for potential confounders in sex-stratified analyses. Results The proportion of psychological distress above cutoff were 26.9% and 10.8% among girls and boys, respectively. In both girls and boys, crude analysis showed positive associations between all inflammatory markers and HSCL-10, except for TWEAK and TRANCE in boys. However, none of these associations were statistically significant. Further, there were no significant findings in the adjusted analyses. Conclusion There was a higher prevalence of psychological distress in girls compared to boys. Pro-inflammatory markers were not significantly associated with psychological distress in data from healthy adolescents aged 15–17 years.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:09:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3bf1676714a24ac98d097c3bececf869
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-7283
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:09:02Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj.art-3bf1676714a24ac98d097c3bececf8692022-12-21T23:53:00ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832022-03-0110111310.1186/s40359-022-00779-8Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures studyJonas Linkas0Luai Awad Ahmed1Gabor Csifcsak2Nina Emaus3Anne-Sofie Furberg4Guri Grimnes5Gunn Pettersen6Kamilla Rognmo7Tore Christoffersen8Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of NorwayInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates UniversityDepartment of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of NorwayDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of NorwayFaculty of Health and Care Sciences, Molde University CollegeDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North NorwayDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of NorwayDepartment of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of NorwayDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of NorwayAbstract Background Inflammatory markers have been associated with depression and anxiety disorder in adolescents. Less is known about the association between inflammation and subclinical symptoms in the form of psychological distress. We investigated prevalence of psychological distress and examined the associations between common pro-inflammatory markers and psychological distress in an adolescent population sample. Methods The study was based on data from 458 girls and 473 boys aged 15–17 years from the Fit Futures Study, a large-scale study on adolescent health, conducted in Northern Norway. Psychological distress was measured with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-10). Serum-levels of the following low-grade inflammatory markers were measured: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-α), tumor necrosis factor alpha variant 1 (TRANCE) and tumor necrosis factor alpha variant 2 (TWEAK). Associations between quartiles of inflammatory markers and HSCL-10 were examined by logistic regression and adjusted for potential confounders in sex-stratified analyses. Results The proportion of psychological distress above cutoff were 26.9% and 10.8% among girls and boys, respectively. In both girls and boys, crude analysis showed positive associations between all inflammatory markers and HSCL-10, except for TWEAK and TRANCE in boys. However, none of these associations were statistically significant. Further, there were no significant findings in the adjusted analyses. Conclusion There was a higher prevalence of psychological distress in girls compared to boys. Pro-inflammatory markers were not significantly associated with psychological distress in data from healthy adolescents aged 15–17 years.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00779-8Psychological distressInflammatory markersDepressive symptomsAnxiety symptomsAdolescence
spellingShingle Jonas Linkas
Luai Awad Ahmed
Gabor Csifcsak
Nina Emaus
Anne-Sofie Furberg
Guri Grimnes
Gunn Pettersen
Kamilla Rognmo
Tore Christoffersen
Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures study
BMC Psychology
Psychological distress
Inflammatory markers
Depressive symptoms
Anxiety symptoms
Adolescence
title Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures study
title_full Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures study
title_fullStr Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures study
title_full_unstemmed Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures study
title_short Are pro-inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross-sectional study of healthy adolescents 15–17 years of age? The Fit Futures study
title_sort are pro inflammatory markers associated with psychological distress in a cross sectional study of healthy adolescents 15 17 years of age the fit futures study
topic Psychological distress
Inflammatory markers
Depressive symptoms
Anxiety symptoms
Adolescence
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00779-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jonaslinkas areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT luaiawadahmed areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT gaborcsifcsak areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT ninaemaus areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT annesofiefurberg areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT gurigrimnes areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT gunnpettersen areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT kamillarognmo areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy
AT torechristoffersen areproinflammatorymarkersassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressinacrosssectionalstudyofhealthyadolescents1517yearsofagethefitfuturesstudy