Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms
Abstract The pedestrians’ feeling of comfort while walking on footpaths varies according to the time of day, environment, and the purpose of the trip. The quality of service offered by pedestrian facilities such as walkways, intersections, and public places is evaluated by the Pedestrian level of se...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53403-7 |
_version_ | 1797275063514300416 |
---|---|
author | Deborah Paul Sara Moridpour Srikanth Venkatesan Nuwan Withanagamage |
author_facet | Deborah Paul Sara Moridpour Srikanth Venkatesan Nuwan Withanagamage |
author_sort | Deborah Paul |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract The pedestrians’ feeling of comfort while walking on footpaths varies according to the time of day, environment, and the purpose of the trip. The quality of service offered by pedestrian facilities such as walkways, intersections, and public places is evaluated by the Pedestrian level of service (PLOS) and has been measured from time to time, to upgrade and maintain the sustainable travel choice of people. This paper aims to focus on the level of service based on three main trip purposes such as work, education, and recreation, while considering various path characteristics and pedestrian flow characteristics that affect the pedestrian’s feeling of comfort on the walkways. The data has been collected using pedestrian questionnaire surveys and pedestrian sensors in the Melbourne central business district and the significant factors that influence the PLOS for each trip purpose will be chosen using the Mutual Information gain, which is found to be different for each trip purpose. The major influencing factors that affect the PLOS will be used to develop machine learning models for three trip purposes separately using Random Forest and Light-GBM algorithm in Python. The accuracy of prediction using the light GBM model is 0.74 for education, 0.80 for recreation, and 0.70 for work trip purposes. It is found using SHAP which stands for Shapely Additive explanations that the factors such as interpersonal distance, distance from vehicles, construction sites, vehicle volume, traffic noise, and footpath surface are the most influencing variables that affect the PLOS based on three different trip purposes. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T15:08:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3bff3d889d3341ab8b6aacacf027bc16 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T15:08:02Z |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-3bff3d889d3341ab8b6aacacf027bc162024-03-05T18:47:51ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-02-0114111510.1038/s41598-024-53403-7Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithmsDeborah Paul0Sara Moridpour1Srikanth Venkatesan2Nuwan Withanagamage3Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT UniversityDepartment of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT UniversityDepartment of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT UniversityFaculty of Information Technology, Monash UniversityAbstract The pedestrians’ feeling of comfort while walking on footpaths varies according to the time of day, environment, and the purpose of the trip. The quality of service offered by pedestrian facilities such as walkways, intersections, and public places is evaluated by the Pedestrian level of service (PLOS) and has been measured from time to time, to upgrade and maintain the sustainable travel choice of people. This paper aims to focus on the level of service based on three main trip purposes such as work, education, and recreation, while considering various path characteristics and pedestrian flow characteristics that affect the pedestrian’s feeling of comfort on the walkways. The data has been collected using pedestrian questionnaire surveys and pedestrian sensors in the Melbourne central business district and the significant factors that influence the PLOS for each trip purpose will be chosen using the Mutual Information gain, which is found to be different for each trip purpose. The major influencing factors that affect the PLOS will be used to develop machine learning models for three trip purposes separately using Random Forest and Light-GBM algorithm in Python. The accuracy of prediction using the light GBM model is 0.74 for education, 0.80 for recreation, and 0.70 for work trip purposes. It is found using SHAP which stands for Shapely Additive explanations that the factors such as interpersonal distance, distance from vehicles, construction sites, vehicle volume, traffic noise, and footpath surface are the most influencing variables that affect the PLOS based on three different trip purposes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53403-7 |
spellingShingle | Deborah Paul Sara Moridpour Srikanth Venkatesan Nuwan Withanagamage Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms Scientific Reports |
title | Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms |
title_full | Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms |
title_short | Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms |
title_sort | evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53403-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deborahpaul evaluatingthepedestrianlevelofserviceforvaryingtrippurposesusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT saramoridpour evaluatingthepedestrianlevelofserviceforvaryingtrippurposesusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT srikanthvenkatesan evaluatingthepedestrianlevelofserviceforvaryingtrippurposesusingmachinelearningalgorithms AT nuwanwithanagamage evaluatingthepedestrianlevelofserviceforvaryingtrippurposesusingmachinelearningalgorithms |