External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures
Peer review is used commonly across science as a tool to evaluate the merit and potential impact of research projects and make funding recommendations. However, potential impact is likely to be difficult to assess ex-ante; some attempts have been made to assess the predictive accuracy of these revie...
Main Authors: | Stephen A. Gallo, Scott R. Glisson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frma.2018.00022/full |
Similar Items
-
‘Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?’: observations on how peer review panels function
by: John Coveney, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Three years of quality assurance data assessing the performance of over 4000 grant peer review contributions to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant Competition
by: Clare L. Ardern, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
by: Ferric C Fang, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01) -
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Karen B. Schmaling, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018
by: David G Pina, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)