Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions

Aims and method This study assesses newly qualified doctors’ confidence in practising clinical skills related to the assessment and management of mental health conditions and how this correlates with other areas of medicine. We conducted a national survey of 1311 Foundation Year 1 doctors in the UK....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George Gillett, Owen Davis, Amarit Gill, Clare van Hamel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press
Series:BJPsych Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469423000487/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797786214422544384
author George Gillett
Owen Davis
Amarit Gill
Clare van Hamel
author_facet George Gillett
Owen Davis
Amarit Gill
Clare van Hamel
author_sort George Gillett
collection DOAJ
description Aims and method This study assesses newly qualified doctors’ confidence in practising clinical skills related to the assessment and management of mental health conditions and how this correlates with other areas of medicine. We conducted a national survey of 1311 Foundation Year 1 doctors in the UK. Survey items assessed confidence recognising mentally unwell patients, conducting a mental state examination, assessing cognition and mental capacity, formulating a psychiatric diagnosis and prescribing psychotropic medications. Results A substantial proportion of surveyed doctors lacked confidence in their clinical skills related to mental health and prescribing psychotropic medications. Network analysis revealed that items corresponding to mental health were highly correlated, suggesting a potential generalised lack of confidence in mental healthcare. Clinical implications We identify areas of lack of confidence in some newly qualified doctors’ ability to assess and manage mental health conditions. Future research might explore how greater exposure to psychiatry, integrated teaching and clinical simulation might better support medical students for future clinical work.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:04:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c0eb2416d4c4004b3c818effef26040
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-4694
2056-4708
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:04:44Z
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series BJPsych Bulletin
spelling doaj.art-3c0eb2416d4c4004b3c818effef260402023-07-06T07:13:11ZengCambridge University PressBJPsych Bulletin2056-46942056-47081610.1192/bjb.2023.48Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditionsGeorge Gillett0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-9369Owen Davis1Amarit Gill2Clare van Hamel3Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UKUK Foundation Programme Office, Birmingham, UKUK Foundation Programme Office, Birmingham, UKSevern Postgraduate Medical Education Foundation School, Bristol, UKAims and method This study assesses newly qualified doctors’ confidence in practising clinical skills related to the assessment and management of mental health conditions and how this correlates with other areas of medicine. We conducted a national survey of 1311 Foundation Year 1 doctors in the UK. Survey items assessed confidence recognising mentally unwell patients, conducting a mental state examination, assessing cognition and mental capacity, formulating a psychiatric diagnosis and prescribing psychotropic medications. Results A substantial proportion of surveyed doctors lacked confidence in their clinical skills related to mental health and prescribing psychotropic medications. Network analysis revealed that items corresponding to mental health were highly correlated, suggesting a potential generalised lack of confidence in mental healthcare. Clinical implications We identify areas of lack of confidence in some newly qualified doctors’ ability to assess and manage mental health conditions. Future research might explore how greater exposure to psychiatry, integrated teaching and clinical simulation might better support medical students for future clinical work. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469423000487/type/journal_articleClinical governanceeducation and trainingconsent and capacityethics
spellingShingle George Gillett
Owen Davis
Amarit Gill
Clare van Hamel
Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions
BJPsych Bulletin
Clinical governance
education and training
consent and capacity
ethics
title Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions
title_full Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions
title_fullStr Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions
title_full_unstemmed Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions
title_short Exploring foundation doctors’ self-reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions
title_sort exploring foundation doctors self reported confidence in the assessment and management of mental health conditions
topic Clinical governance
education and training
consent and capacity
ethics
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056469423000487/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT georgegillett exploringfoundationdoctorsselfreportedconfidenceintheassessmentandmanagementofmentalhealthconditions
AT owendavis exploringfoundationdoctorsselfreportedconfidenceintheassessmentandmanagementofmentalhealthconditions
AT amaritgill exploringfoundationdoctorsselfreportedconfidenceintheassessmentandmanagementofmentalhealthconditions
AT clarevanhamel exploringfoundationdoctorsselfreportedconfidenceintheassessmentandmanagementofmentalhealthconditions