Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasets

Aim: Quantitative analysis of brain single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging is dependent on normative datasets that are challenging to produce. This study investigated the combination of SPECT neuroimaging from a large clinical population rather than small numbers of con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lindsay M. Quandt, Cyrus A. Raji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Exploration Publishing Inc. 2020-10-01
Series:Exploration of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.explorationpub.com/Journals/em/Article/100122
_version_ 1818591628739215360
author Lindsay M. Quandt
Cyrus A. Raji
author_facet Lindsay M. Quandt
Cyrus A. Raji
author_sort Lindsay M. Quandt
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Quantitative analysis of brain single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging is dependent on normative datasets that are challenging to produce. This study investigated the combination of SPECT neuroimaging from a large clinical population rather than small numbers of controls. The authors hypothesized this “population template” would demonstrate noninferiority to a control dataset, providing a viable alternative for quantifying perfusion abnormalities in SPECT neuroimaging. Methods: A total of 2, 068 clinical SPECT scans were averaged to form the “population template”. Validation was three-fold. First, the template was imported into SPECT brain analysis software, MIMneuro®, and compared against its control dataset of 90 individuals through its region and cluster analysis tools. Second, a cohort of 100 cognitively impaired subjects was evaluated against both the population template and MIMneuro®’s normative dataset to compute region-based metrics. Concordance and intraclass correlation coefficients, mean square deviations, total deviation indices, and limits of agreement were derived from these data to measure agreement and test for noninferiority. Finally, the same patients were clinically read in CereMetrix® to confirm that expected perfusion patterns appeared after comparison to the template. Results: MIMneuro®’s default threshold for normality is ± 1.65 z-score and this served as our noninferiority margin. Direct comparison of the template to controls produced no regions that exceeded this threshold and all clusters identified were far from statistically significant. Agreement measures revealed consistency between the softwares and that CereMetrix® results were noninferior to MIMneuro®, albeit with proportional bias. Visual analysis also confirmed that expected perfusion patterns appeared when individual scans were compared to the population template within CereMetrix®. Conclusions: The authors demonstrated a population template was noninferior to a smaller control dataset despite inclusion of abnormal scans. This suggests that our patient-based population template can serve as an alternative for identifying and quantifying perfusion abnormalities in brain SPECT.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T10:15:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c110cfa609048b89c6d1292ca9b2527
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2692-3106
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T10:15:28Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Open Exploration Publishing Inc.
record_format Article
series Exploration of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-3c110cfa609048b89c6d1292ca9b25272022-12-21T22:35:28ZengOpen Exploration Publishing Inc.Exploration of Medicine2692-31062020-10-011533135410.37349/emed.2020.00022Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasetsLindsay M. Quandt0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-3309Cyrus A. Raji1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-0105CereHealth Corporation, Littleton, CO 80120, USA Email: LQuandt@ceremetrix.ioMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USAAim: Quantitative analysis of brain single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging is dependent on normative datasets that are challenging to produce. This study investigated the combination of SPECT neuroimaging from a large clinical population rather than small numbers of controls. The authors hypothesized this “population template” would demonstrate noninferiority to a control dataset, providing a viable alternative for quantifying perfusion abnormalities in SPECT neuroimaging. Methods: A total of 2, 068 clinical SPECT scans were averaged to form the “population template”. Validation was three-fold. First, the template was imported into SPECT brain analysis software, MIMneuro®, and compared against its control dataset of 90 individuals through its region and cluster analysis tools. Second, a cohort of 100 cognitively impaired subjects was evaluated against both the population template and MIMneuro®’s normative dataset to compute region-based metrics. Concordance and intraclass correlation coefficients, mean square deviations, total deviation indices, and limits of agreement were derived from these data to measure agreement and test for noninferiority. Finally, the same patients were clinically read in CereMetrix® to confirm that expected perfusion patterns appeared after comparison to the template. Results: MIMneuro®’s default threshold for normality is ± 1.65 z-score and this served as our noninferiority margin. Direct comparison of the template to controls produced no regions that exceeded this threshold and all clusters identified were far from statistically significant. Agreement measures revealed consistency between the softwares and that CereMetrix® results were noninferior to MIMneuro®, albeit with proportional bias. Visual analysis also confirmed that expected perfusion patterns appeared when individual scans were compared to the population template within CereMetrix®. Conclusions: The authors demonstrated a population template was noninferior to a smaller control dataset despite inclusion of abnormal scans. This suggests that our patient-based population template can serve as an alternative for identifying and quantifying perfusion abnormalities in brain SPECT.https://www.explorationpub.com/Journals/em/Article/100122brain imagingspectdiagnostic imagingcognitive impairmenttraumatic brain injurynoninferiority trialquantitative imaging biomarkersnormative database
spellingShingle Lindsay M. Quandt
Cyrus A. Raji
Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasets
Exploration of Medicine
brain imaging
spect
diagnostic imaging
cognitive impairment
traumatic brain injury
noninferiority trial
quantitative imaging biomarkers
normative database
title Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasets
title_full Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasets
title_fullStr Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasets
title_full_unstemmed Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasets
title_short Going against the norm: validation of a novel alternative to brain SPECT normative datasets
title_sort going against the norm validation of a novel alternative to brain spect normative datasets
topic brain imaging
spect
diagnostic imaging
cognitive impairment
traumatic brain injury
noninferiority trial
quantitative imaging biomarkers
normative database
url https://www.explorationpub.com/Journals/em/Article/100122
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsaymquandt goingagainstthenormvalidationofanovelalternativetobrainspectnormativedatasets
AT cyrusaraji goingagainstthenormvalidationofanovelalternativetobrainspectnormativedatasets