Could Robot Judges Believe? Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial as we approach the Digital Age
Criminal proof is unique, in that it must be able to account for the justification of both: accurate fact-finding and a fair trial. This is Sarah Summers’ main message in her article on the epistemic ambitions of the criminal trial, which focusses on belief as a sort of proxy for societal acceptance...
Main Author: | Sabine Gless |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Marcial Pons
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Quaestio Facti |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22849 |
Similar Items
-
Current legal organization of judicial evidence and 'independent, objective' judges
by: A.S. Aleksandrov, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
The impact of modern scientific evidence on the personalconviction of a criminal judge
by: بن مالك أحمد
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Functions of the checks and balances of the investigative judge in a criminal trial
by: Alimkulov E.T.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Reply to the Comments on Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights
by: Sarah Jane Summers
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Subiecţii implicaţi în administrarea probelor în procesul penal – riscuri şi oportunităţi//Subjects involved in the administration of evidence in criminal proceedings – risks and opportunities
by: Ion Covalciuc
Published: (2022-11-01)