Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography

Tensiomyography (TMG) is a non-invasive method for measuring contractile properties of skeletal muscle that is increasingly being used in research and practice. However, the lack of standardization in measurement protocols mitigates the systematic use in sports medical settings. Therefore, this stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carsten Schwiete, Christian Roth, Christoph Braun, Lukas Rettenmaier, Kevin Happ, Georg Langen, Michael Behringer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910630/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1811166051723902976
author Carsten Schwiete
Christian Roth
Christoph Braun
Lukas Rettenmaier
Kevin Happ
Georg Langen
Michael Behringer
author_facet Carsten Schwiete
Christian Roth
Christoph Braun
Lukas Rettenmaier
Kevin Happ
Georg Langen
Michael Behringer
author_sort Carsten Schwiete
collection DOAJ
description Tensiomyography (TMG) is a non-invasive method for measuring contractile properties of skeletal muscle that is increasingly being used in research and practice. However, the lack of standardization in measurement protocols mitigates the systematic use in sports medical settings. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of lower leg fixation and sensor location on TMG-derived parameters. Twenty-two male participants underwent TMG measurements on the m. biceps femoris (BF) in randomized order with and without lower leg fixation (fixed vs. non-fixed). Measurements were conducted at 50% of the muscle’s length (BF-mid) and 10 cm distal to this (BF-distal). The sensor location affected the contractile properties significantly, both with and without fixation. Delay time (Td) was greater at BF-mid compared to BF-distal (fixed: 23.2 ± 3.2 ms vs. 21.2 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.002; non-fixed: 24.03 ± 4.2 ms vs. 21.8 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.008), as were maximum displacement (Dm) (fixed: 5.3 ± 2.7 mm vs. 3.5 ± 1.7 mm, p = 0.005; non-fixed: 5.4 ± 2.5 mm vs. 4.0 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.03), and contraction velocity (Vc) (fixed: 76.7 ± 25.1 mm/s vs. 57.2 ± 24.3 mm/s, p = 0.02). No significant differences were revealed for lower leg fixation (all p > 0.05). In summary, sensor location affects the TMG-derived parameters on the BF. Our findings help researchers to create tailored measurement procedures in compliance with the individual goals of the TMG measurements and allow adequate interpretation of TMG parameters.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T15:47:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c2045790c3346a5b79451aef26b7087
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T15:47:14Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-3c2045790c3346a5b79451aef26b70872023-02-12T05:31:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01182Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyographyCarsten SchwieteChristian RothChristoph BraunLukas RettenmaierKevin HappGeorg LangenMichael BehringerTensiomyography (TMG) is a non-invasive method for measuring contractile properties of skeletal muscle that is increasingly being used in research and practice. However, the lack of standardization in measurement protocols mitigates the systematic use in sports medical settings. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of lower leg fixation and sensor location on TMG-derived parameters. Twenty-two male participants underwent TMG measurements on the m. biceps femoris (BF) in randomized order with and without lower leg fixation (fixed vs. non-fixed). Measurements were conducted at 50% of the muscle’s length (BF-mid) and 10 cm distal to this (BF-distal). The sensor location affected the contractile properties significantly, both with and without fixation. Delay time (Td) was greater at BF-mid compared to BF-distal (fixed: 23.2 ± 3.2 ms vs. 21.2 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.002; non-fixed: 24.03 ± 4.2 ms vs. 21.8 ± 2.7 ms, p = 0.008), as were maximum displacement (Dm) (fixed: 5.3 ± 2.7 mm vs. 3.5 ± 1.7 mm, p = 0.005; non-fixed: 5.4 ± 2.5 mm vs. 4.0 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.03), and contraction velocity (Vc) (fixed: 76.7 ± 25.1 mm/s vs. 57.2 ± 24.3 mm/s, p = 0.02). No significant differences were revealed for lower leg fixation (all p > 0.05). In summary, sensor location affects the TMG-derived parameters on the BF. Our findings help researchers to create tailored measurement procedures in compliance with the individual goals of the TMG measurements and allow adequate interpretation of TMG parameters.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910630/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Carsten Schwiete
Christian Roth
Christoph Braun
Lukas Rettenmaier
Kevin Happ
Georg Langen
Michael Behringer
Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
PLoS ONE
title Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_full Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_fullStr Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_full_unstemmed Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_short Sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
title_sort sensor location affects skeletal muscle contractility parameters measured by tensiomyography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910630/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT carstenschwiete sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT christianroth sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT christophbraun sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT lukasrettenmaier sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT kevinhapp sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT georglangen sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography
AT michaelbehringer sensorlocationaffectsskeletalmusclecontractilityparametersmeasuredbytensiomyography