Necessary Conclusions in Moods with only One Necessary Premise A problem in Aristotelian modal syllogism
There are many criticisms about Aristotelian modal syllogism. Some logicians tried to provide adequate formulation of his total system but they were not successful. Therefore some logicians decided to account for those parts of the system which had been more controversial. The most controversial of...
Main Author: | F Nabati |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
University of Isfahan
2010-03-01
|
Series: | Metaphysics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/mph/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-8&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
Similar Items
-
Necessary Conclusions in Moods with only One Necessary Premise A problem in Aristotelian modal syllogism
by: F. Nabati
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Studying Aristotelian Syllogism according to Implicative and Conductive Accounts
by: Hamideh Bahmanpour, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
The Analytical Perspective of Aristotle’s Categorical and Modal Syllogisms
by: Marian Andrzej Wesoły
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Mixed Ḥaqīqī-Khārijī Syllogisms: The Productive Moods and Their Conclusions
by: Asadollah Fallahi
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Suhrawardi’s Ideas about Syllogism
by: Z. Movahed
Published: (2010-01-01)