Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in China

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) production has been attracting environmental concerns due to its high energy consumption and high pollutant discharge, especially to water and the air. The water footprint of MSG has been investigated in previous studies; however, the carbon emissions have not been evaluat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dong Yang, Huaji Li, Xuexiu Jia, Fei Yu, Guanzhu Wang, Yuhan Zhang, Weiyu Wang, Lihua Zang, Feng Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2023-10-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/13673
_version_ 1797659964385263616
author Dong Yang
Huaji Li
Xuexiu Jia
Fei Yu
Guanzhu Wang
Yuhan Zhang
Weiyu Wang
Lihua Zang
Feng Shi
author_facet Dong Yang
Huaji Li
Xuexiu Jia
Fei Yu
Guanzhu Wang
Yuhan Zhang
Weiyu Wang
Lihua Zang
Feng Shi
author_sort Dong Yang
collection DOAJ
description Monosodium glutamate (MSG) production has been attracting environmental concerns due to its high energy consumption and high pollutant discharge, especially to water and the air. The water footprint of MSG has been investigated in previous studies; however, the carbon emissions have not been evaluated. This study conducted a carbon footprint analysis on monosodium glutamate production, to identify the critical material and stage that contribute the most to the carbon footprint during MSG production. The results indicated that the carbon footprint of producing 1 t of MSG is 3.14 × 103 kgCO2eq, and 32.92 % of which is from the extraction and refinement process. Indirect emissions from raw materials used in MSG production, such as caustic soda liquid and concentrated sulfuric acid, and on-site emissions from the prodsteam production are major carbon footprint contributors. In addition, the glutamate fermentation stage accounts for 23.35 % of the total carbon footprint of MSG production due to the use of steam and liquid ammonia. In terms of the hotspot of carbon footprint in MSG production, it is identified that the steam used is the largest contributor, accounting for 34.90 % of the total carbon footprint in MSG production, followed by coal (16.47 %). Based on the research results, several cleaner production suggestions, such as greener raw materials utilization, green supply chain construction, and industrial symbiosis network establishment are proposed to further reduce the overall carbon footprint of MSG production.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:22:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c456872148b4bc1994eaa5c09e5c2ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2283-9216
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:22:53Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
record_format Article
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
spelling doaj.art-3c456872148b4bc1994eaa5c09e5c2ed2023-10-14T22:44:30ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162023-10-01103Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in ChinaDong YangHuaji LiXuexiu JiaFei YuGuanzhu WangYuhan ZhangWeiyu WangLihua ZangFeng ShiMonosodium glutamate (MSG) production has been attracting environmental concerns due to its high energy consumption and high pollutant discharge, especially to water and the air. The water footprint of MSG has been investigated in previous studies; however, the carbon emissions have not been evaluated. This study conducted a carbon footprint analysis on monosodium glutamate production, to identify the critical material and stage that contribute the most to the carbon footprint during MSG production. The results indicated that the carbon footprint of producing 1 t of MSG is 3.14 × 103 kgCO2eq, and 32.92 % of which is from the extraction and refinement process. Indirect emissions from raw materials used in MSG production, such as caustic soda liquid and concentrated sulfuric acid, and on-site emissions from the prodsteam production are major carbon footprint contributors. In addition, the glutamate fermentation stage accounts for 23.35 % of the total carbon footprint of MSG production due to the use of steam and liquid ammonia. In terms of the hotspot of carbon footprint in MSG production, it is identified that the steam used is the largest contributor, accounting for 34.90 % of the total carbon footprint in MSG production, followed by coal (16.47 %). Based on the research results, several cleaner production suggestions, such as greener raw materials utilization, green supply chain construction, and industrial symbiosis network establishment are proposed to further reduce the overall carbon footprint of MSG production.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/13673
spellingShingle Dong Yang
Huaji Li
Xuexiu Jia
Fei Yu
Guanzhu Wang
Yuhan Zhang
Weiyu Wang
Lihua Zang
Feng Shi
Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in China
Chemical Engineering Transactions
title Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in China
title_full Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in China
title_fullStr Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in China
title_full_unstemmed Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in China
title_short Carbon Footprint of Monosodium Glutamate Production in China
title_sort carbon footprint of monosodium glutamate production in china
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/13673
work_keys_str_mv AT dongyang carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT huajili carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT xuexiujia carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT feiyu carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT guanzhuwang carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT yuhanzhang carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT weiyuwang carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT lihuazang carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina
AT fengshi carbonfootprintofmonosodiumglutamateproductioninchina