How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin

Abstract “When I use a word, it means whatever I want it to mean”: Humpty Dumpty in Alice’s Adventures Through The Looking Glass, Lewis Carroll. “Digital twin” is currently a term applied in a wide variety of ways. Some differences are variations from sector to sector, but definitions within a secto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louise Wright, Stuart Davidson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-03-01
Series:Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4
_version_ 1818310374840074240
author Louise Wright
Stuart Davidson
author_facet Louise Wright
Stuart Davidson
author_sort Louise Wright
collection DOAJ
description Abstract “When I use a word, it means whatever I want it to mean”: Humpty Dumpty in Alice’s Adventures Through The Looking Glass, Lewis Carroll. “Digital twin” is currently a term applied in a wide variety of ways. Some differences are variations from sector to sector, but definitions within a sector can also vary significantly. Within engineering, claims are made regarding the benefits of using digital twinning for design, optimisation, process control, virtual testing, predictive maintenance, and lifetime estimation. In many of its usages, the distinction between a model and a digital twin is not made clear. The danger of this variety and vagueness is that a poor or inconsistent definition and explanation of a digital twin may lead people to reject it as just hype, so that once the hype and the inevitable backlash are over the final level of interest and use (the “plateau of productivity”) may fall well below the maximum potential of the technology. The basic components of a digital twin (essentially a model and some data) are generally comparatively mature and well-understood. Many of the aspects of using data in models are similarly well-understood, from long experience in model validation and verification and from development of boundary, initial and loading conditions from measured values. However, many interesting open questions exist, some connected with the volume and speed of data, some connected with reliability and uncertainty, and some to do with dynamic model updating. In this paper we highlight the essential differences between a model and a digital twin, outline some of the key benefits of using digital twins, and suggest directions for further research to fully exploit the potential of the approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T07:45:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c471775c9eb4a0db47d346f990e941b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2213-7467
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T07:45:03Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
spelling doaj.art-3c471775c9eb4a0db47d346f990e941b2022-12-21T23:54:52ZengSpringerOpenAdvanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences2213-74672020-03-017111310.1186/s40323-020-00147-4How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twinLouise Wright0Stuart Davidson1National Physical LaboratoryNational Physical LaboratoryAbstract “When I use a word, it means whatever I want it to mean”: Humpty Dumpty in Alice’s Adventures Through The Looking Glass, Lewis Carroll. “Digital twin” is currently a term applied in a wide variety of ways. Some differences are variations from sector to sector, but definitions within a sector can also vary significantly. Within engineering, claims are made regarding the benefits of using digital twinning for design, optimisation, process control, virtual testing, predictive maintenance, and lifetime estimation. In many of its usages, the distinction between a model and a digital twin is not made clear. The danger of this variety and vagueness is that a poor or inconsistent definition and explanation of a digital twin may lead people to reject it as just hype, so that once the hype and the inevitable backlash are over the final level of interest and use (the “plateau of productivity”) may fall well below the maximum potential of the technology. The basic components of a digital twin (essentially a model and some data) are generally comparatively mature and well-understood. Many of the aspects of using data in models are similarly well-understood, from long experience in model validation and verification and from development of boundary, initial and loading conditions from measured values. However, many interesting open questions exist, some connected with the volume and speed of data, some connected with reliability and uncertainty, and some to do with dynamic model updating. In this paper we highlight the essential differences between a model and a digital twin, outline some of the key benefits of using digital twins, and suggest directions for further research to fully exploit the potential of the approach.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4Digital twinData scienceUncertainty evaluationModel updating
spellingShingle Louise Wright
Stuart Davidson
How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin
Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
Digital twin
Data science
Uncertainty evaluation
Model updating
title How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin
title_full How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin
title_fullStr How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin
title_full_unstemmed How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin
title_short How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin
title_sort how to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin
topic Digital twin
Data science
Uncertainty evaluation
Model updating
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4
work_keys_str_mv AT louisewright howtotellthedifferencebetweenamodelandadigitaltwin
AT stuartdavidson howtotellthedifferencebetweenamodelandadigitaltwin