Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces

Knowing how humans differentiate children from adults has useful implications in many areas of both forensic and cognitive psychology. Yet, how we extract age from faces has been surprisingly underexplored in both disciplines. Here, we used a novel data-driven experimental technique to objectively m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand, Juliane A. Kloess, Frédéric Gosselin, Ian Charest, Jessica Woodhams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775338/full
_version_ 1818840448048824320
author Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand
Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand
Juliane A. Kloess
Frédéric Gosselin
Ian Charest
Ian Charest
Jessica Woodhams
author_facet Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand
Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand
Juliane A. Kloess
Frédéric Gosselin
Ian Charest
Ian Charest
Jessica Woodhams
author_sort Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand
collection DOAJ
description Knowing how humans differentiate children from adults has useful implications in many areas of both forensic and cognitive psychology. Yet, how we extract age from faces has been surprisingly underexplored in both disciplines. Here, we used a novel data-driven experimental technique to objectively measure the facial features human observers use to categorise child and adult faces. Relying on more than 35,000 trials, we used a reverse correlation technique that enabled us to reveal how specific features which are known to be important in face-perception – position, spatial-frequency (SF), and orientation – are associated with accurate child and adult discrimination. This showed that human observers relied on evidence in the nasal bone and eyebrow area for accurate adult categorisation, while they relied on the eye and jawline area to accurately categorise child faces. For orientation structure, only facial information of vertical orientation was linked to face-adult categorisation, while features of horizontal and, to a lesser extent oblique orientations, were more diagnostic of a child face. Finally, we found that SF diagnosticity showed a U-shaped pattern for face-age categorisation, with information in low and high SFs being diagnostic of child faces, and mid SFs being diagnostic of adult faces. Through this first characterisation of the facial features of face-age categorisation, we show that important information found in psychophysical studies of face-perception in general (i.e., the eye area, horizontals, and mid-level SFs) is crucial to the practical context of face-age categorisation, and present data-driven procedures through which face-age classification training could be implemented for real-world challenges.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T04:10:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c4ea9b035304429bd590844cbfbae0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T04:10:20Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-3c4ea9b035304429bd590844cbfbae0a2022-12-21T20:36:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-11-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.775338775338Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child FacesSimon Faghel-Soubeyrand0Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand1Juliane A. Kloess2Frédéric Gosselin3Ian Charest4Ian Charest5Jessica Woodhams6Département de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, CanadaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomDépartement de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, CanadaDépartement de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, CanadaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomKnowing how humans differentiate children from adults has useful implications in many areas of both forensic and cognitive psychology. Yet, how we extract age from faces has been surprisingly underexplored in both disciplines. Here, we used a novel data-driven experimental technique to objectively measure the facial features human observers use to categorise child and adult faces. Relying on more than 35,000 trials, we used a reverse correlation technique that enabled us to reveal how specific features which are known to be important in face-perception – position, spatial-frequency (SF), and orientation – are associated with accurate child and adult discrimination. This showed that human observers relied on evidence in the nasal bone and eyebrow area for accurate adult categorisation, while they relied on the eye and jawline area to accurately categorise child faces. For orientation structure, only facial information of vertical orientation was linked to face-adult categorisation, while features of horizontal and, to a lesser extent oblique orientations, were more diagnostic of a child face. Finally, we found that SF diagnosticity showed a U-shaped pattern for face-age categorisation, with information in low and high SFs being diagnostic of child faces, and mid SFs being diagnostic of adult faces. Through this first characterisation of the facial features of face-age categorisation, we show that important information found in psychophysical studies of face-perception in general (i.e., the eye area, horizontals, and mid-level SFs) is crucial to the practical context of face-age categorisation, and present data-driven procedures through which face-age classification training could be implemented for real-world challenges.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775338/fullface agefacial featureforensic psychology and legal issuesface perception and cognitionpsychophysicsvision
spellingShingle Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand
Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand
Juliane A. Kloess
Frédéric Gosselin
Ian Charest
Ian Charest
Jessica Woodhams
Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces
Frontiers in Psychology
face age
facial feature
forensic psychology and legal issues
face perception and cognition
psychophysics
vision
title Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces
title_full Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces
title_fullStr Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces
title_short Diagnostic Features for Human Categorisation of Adult and Child Faces
title_sort diagnostic features for human categorisation of adult and child faces
topic face age
facial feature
forensic psychology and legal issues
face perception and cognition
psychophysics
vision
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775338/full
work_keys_str_mv AT simonfaghelsoubeyrand diagnosticfeaturesforhumancategorisationofadultandchildfaces
AT simonfaghelsoubeyrand diagnosticfeaturesforhumancategorisationofadultandchildfaces
AT julianeakloess diagnosticfeaturesforhumancategorisationofadultandchildfaces
AT fredericgosselin diagnosticfeaturesforhumancategorisationofadultandchildfaces
AT iancharest diagnosticfeaturesforhumancategorisationofadultandchildfaces
AT iancharest diagnosticfeaturesforhumancategorisationofadultandchildfaces
AT jessicawoodhams diagnosticfeaturesforhumancategorisationofadultandchildfaces