Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data

Quantifying which assembly processes structure microbiomes can assist prediction, manipulation, and engineering of community outcomes. However, the relative importance of these processes might depend on whether DNA or RNA are used, as they differ in stability. We hypothesized that RNA-inferred commu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiu Jia, Francisco Dini-Andreote, Joana Falcão Salles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/6/798
_version_ 1797566938102104064
author Xiu Jia
Francisco Dini-Andreote
Joana Falcão Salles
author_facet Xiu Jia
Francisco Dini-Andreote
Joana Falcão Salles
author_sort Xiu Jia
collection DOAJ
description Quantifying which assembly processes structure microbiomes can assist prediction, manipulation, and engineering of community outcomes. However, the relative importance of these processes might depend on whether DNA or RNA are used, as they differ in stability. We hypothesized that RNA-inferred community responses to (a)biotic fluctuations are faster than those inferred by DNA; the relative influence of variable selection is stronger in RNA-inferred communities (environmental factors are spatiotemporally heterogeneous), whereas homogeneous selection largely influences DNA-inferred communities (environmental filters are constant). To test these hypotheses, we characterized soil bacterial communities by sequencing both 16S rRNA amplicons from the extracted DNA and RNA transcripts across distinct stages of soil primary succession and quantified the relative influence of each assembly process using ecological null model analysis. Our results revealed that variations in α-diversity and temporal turnover were higher in RNA- than in DNA-inferred communities across successional stages, albeit there was a similar community composition; in line with our hypotheses, the assembly of RNA-inferred community was more closely associated with environmental variability (variable selection) than using the standard DNA-based approach, which was largely influenced by homogeneous selection. This study illustrates the need for benchmarking approaches to properly elucidate how community assembly processes structure microbial communities.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:34:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c5d3c38a05c49f09f0af0678b5a6e81
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2607
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:34:31Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj.art-3c5d3c38a05c49f09f0af0678b5a6e812023-11-20T01:47:58ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072020-05-018679810.3390/microorganisms8060798Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA DataXiu Jia0Francisco Dini-Andreote1Joana Falcão Salles2Microbial Ecology Cluster, Genomics Research in Ecology and Evolution in Nature (GREEN), Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USAMicrobial Ecology Cluster, Genomics Research in Ecology and Evolution in Nature (GREEN), Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsQuantifying which assembly processes structure microbiomes can assist prediction, manipulation, and engineering of community outcomes. However, the relative importance of these processes might depend on whether DNA or RNA are used, as they differ in stability. We hypothesized that RNA-inferred community responses to (a)biotic fluctuations are faster than those inferred by DNA; the relative influence of variable selection is stronger in RNA-inferred communities (environmental factors are spatiotemporally heterogeneous), whereas homogeneous selection largely influences DNA-inferred communities (environmental filters are constant). To test these hypotheses, we characterized soil bacterial communities by sequencing both 16S rRNA amplicons from the extracted DNA and RNA transcripts across distinct stages of soil primary succession and quantified the relative influence of each assembly process using ecological null model analysis. Our results revealed that variations in α-diversity and temporal turnover were higher in RNA- than in DNA-inferred communities across successional stages, albeit there was a similar community composition; in line with our hypotheses, the assembly of RNA-inferred community was more closely associated with environmental variability (variable selection) than using the standard DNA-based approach, which was largely influenced by homogeneous selection. This study illustrates the need for benchmarking approaches to properly elucidate how community assembly processes structure microbial communities.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/6/79816S rRNA genecommunity turnoverecological modelingselectiondispersaldrift
spellingShingle Xiu Jia
Francisco Dini-Andreote
Joana Falcão Salles
Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data
Microorganisms
16S rRNA gene
community turnover
ecological modeling
selection
dispersal
drift
title Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data
title_full Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data
title_fullStr Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data
title_short Comparing the Influence of Assembly Processes Governing Bacterial Community Succession Based on DNA and RNA Data
title_sort comparing the influence of assembly processes governing bacterial community succession based on dna and rna data
topic 16S rRNA gene
community turnover
ecological modeling
selection
dispersal
drift
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/6/798
work_keys_str_mv AT xiujia comparingtheinfluenceofassemblyprocessesgoverningbacterialcommunitysuccessionbasedondnaandrnadata
AT franciscodiniandreote comparingtheinfluenceofassemblyprocessesgoverningbacterialcommunitysuccessionbasedondnaandrnadata
AT joanafalcaosalles comparingtheinfluenceofassemblyprocessesgoverningbacterialcommunitysuccessionbasedondnaandrnadata