Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study

Background Objective markers of cardiac function are limited in the outpatient setting and may be beneficial for monitoring patients with chronic cardiac conditions. We assess the accuracy of a scale, with the ability to capture ballistocardiography, electrocardiography, and impedance plethysmograph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Yazdi, Suriya Sridaran, Sarah Smith, Corey Centen, Sarin Patel, Evan Wilson, Leah Gillon, Sunil Kapur, Julie A. Tracy, Katherine Lewine, David M. Systrom, Calum A. MacRae
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021893
_version_ 1797945391080013824
author Daniel Yazdi
Suriya Sridaran
Sarah Smith
Corey Centen
Sarin Patel
Evan Wilson
Leah Gillon
Sunil Kapur
Julie A. Tracy
Katherine Lewine
David M. Systrom
Calum A. MacRae
author_facet Daniel Yazdi
Suriya Sridaran
Sarah Smith
Corey Centen
Sarin Patel
Evan Wilson
Leah Gillon
Sunil Kapur
Julie A. Tracy
Katherine Lewine
David M. Systrom
Calum A. MacRae
author_sort Daniel Yazdi
collection DOAJ
description Background Objective markers of cardiac function are limited in the outpatient setting and may be beneficial for monitoring patients with chronic cardiac conditions. We assess the accuracy of a scale, with the ability to capture ballistocardiography, electrocardiography, and impedance plethysmography signals from a patient’s feet while standing on the scale, in measuring stroke volume and cardiac output compared with the gold‐standard direct Fick method. Methods and Results Thirty‐two patients with unexplained dyspnea undergoing level 3 invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test at a tertiary medical center were included in the final analysis. We obtained scale and direct Fick measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output before and immediately after invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test. Stroke volume and cardiac output from a cardiac scale and the direct Fick method correlated with r=0.81 and r=0.85, respectively (P<0.001 each). The mean absolute error of the scale estimated stroke volume was −1.58 mL, with a 95% limits of agreement of −21.97 to 18.81 mL. The mean error for the scale estimated cardiac output was −0.31 L/min, with a 95% limits of agreement of −2.62 to 2.00 L/min. The changes in stroke volume and cardiac output before and after exercise were 78.9% and 96.7% concordant, respectively, between the 2 measuring methods. Conclusions In a proof‐of‐concept study, this novel scale with cardiac monitoring abilities may allow for noninvasive, longitudinal measures of cardiac function. Using the widely accepted form factor of a bathroom scale, this method of monitoring can be easily integrated into a patient’s lifestyle.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:54:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c87a0b3385348539dec42ac3437aaed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:54:24Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-3c87a0b3385348539dec42ac3437aaed2023-01-23T07:23:59ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802021-12-01102410.1161/JAHA.121.021893Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility StudyDaniel Yazdi0Suriya Sridaran1Sarah Smith2Corey Centen3Sarin Patel4Evan Wilson5Leah Gillon6Sunil Kapur7Julie A. Tracy8Katherine Lewine9David M. Systrom10Calum A. MacRae11Bodyport Inc San Francisco CAOne Brave IdeaBrigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MABodyport Inc San Francisco CABodyport Inc San Francisco CABodyport Inc San Francisco CAOne Brave IdeaBrigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MAOne Brave IdeaBrigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MACardiovascular Division Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MACardiovascular Division Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MACardiovascular Division Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MADivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Department of Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MAOne Brave IdeaBrigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MABackground Objective markers of cardiac function are limited in the outpatient setting and may be beneficial for monitoring patients with chronic cardiac conditions. We assess the accuracy of a scale, with the ability to capture ballistocardiography, electrocardiography, and impedance plethysmography signals from a patient’s feet while standing on the scale, in measuring stroke volume and cardiac output compared with the gold‐standard direct Fick method. Methods and Results Thirty‐two patients with unexplained dyspnea undergoing level 3 invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test at a tertiary medical center were included in the final analysis. We obtained scale and direct Fick measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output before and immediately after invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test. Stroke volume and cardiac output from a cardiac scale and the direct Fick method correlated with r=0.81 and r=0.85, respectively (P<0.001 each). The mean absolute error of the scale estimated stroke volume was −1.58 mL, with a 95% limits of agreement of −21.97 to 18.81 mL. The mean error for the scale estimated cardiac output was −0.31 L/min, with a 95% limits of agreement of −2.62 to 2.00 L/min. The changes in stroke volume and cardiac output before and after exercise were 78.9% and 96.7% concordant, respectively, between the 2 measuring methods. Conclusions In a proof‐of‐concept study, this novel scale with cardiac monitoring abilities may allow for noninvasive, longitudinal measures of cardiac function. Using the widely accepted form factor of a bathroom scale, this method of monitoring can be easily integrated into a patient’s lifestyle.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021893digital healthexercise testingheart failurehemodynamicsintelligencemachine learning and artificial
spellingShingle Daniel Yazdi
Suriya Sridaran
Sarah Smith
Corey Centen
Sarin Patel
Evan Wilson
Leah Gillon
Sunil Kapur
Julie A. Tracy
Katherine Lewine
David M. Systrom
Calum A. MacRae
Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
digital health
exercise testing
heart failure
hemodynamics
intelligence
machine learning and artificial
title Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study
title_full Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study
title_short Noninvasive Scale Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Compared With the Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study
title_sort noninvasive scale measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output compared with the direct fick method a feasibility study
topic digital health
exercise testing
heart failure
hemodynamics
intelligence
machine learning and artificial
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021893
work_keys_str_mv AT danielyazdi noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT suriyasridaran noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT sarahsmith noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT coreycenten noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT sarinpatel noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT evanwilson noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT leahgillon noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT sunilkapur noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT julieatracy noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT katherinelewine noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT davidmsystrom noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy
AT calumamacrae noninvasivescalemeasurementofstrokevolumeandcardiacoutputcomparedwiththedirectfickmethodafeasibilitystudy