Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)

Background and Objectives: The continuous increase in solid waste generation worldwide due to population growth and industrialization, calls for management strategies that integrate concerns for environmental sustainability. By quantifying environmental impacts of systems, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S Nasrollahi-Sarvaghaji, R Alimardani, M Sharifi, MR Taghizadeh Yazdi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2016-09-01
Series:سلامت و محیط
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijhe.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-866-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1818692644909350912
author S Nasrollahi-Sarvaghaji
R Alimardani
M Sharifi
MR Taghizadeh Yazdi
author_facet S Nasrollahi-Sarvaghaji
R Alimardani
M Sharifi
MR Taghizadeh Yazdi
author_sort S Nasrollahi-Sarvaghaji
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives: The continuous increase in solid waste generation worldwide due to population growth and industrialization, calls for management strategies that integrate concerns for environmental sustainability. By quantifying environmental impacts of systems, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool which can contribute to answering that call. The aim of this study was to evaluate environmental pollutants resulting from various treatment options including anaerobic digestion, incineration, and landfill of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) generated daily in Tehran. Materials and Methods: First, the physical properties of the waste and consumption of inputs in the study area were determined from September to October, 2014- 2015. Then the different steps of LCA in relation to each of the subsystems were followed (with SimaPro software). Finally, the results based on the CML Baseline 2000 were presented and analyzed. Results: It was found that when the higher rate of separation and processing in any subsystems increases, the emission of environmental pollutants decreases, so that the global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, and abiotic depletion as the most important impact categories in the subsystems of anaerobic digestion were obtained as -125935 kg CO2/day, -449 kg SO2/day, -1690 kg PO43-/day and -0.43 kg Sb/day, respectively and in incineration were obtained as -264872 kg CO2/day, -974 kg SO2/day, -3471 kg PO43-/day and -0.76 kg Sb/day, respectively, while in the landfill subsystem, they were estimated to be 74478 kg CO2/day, 362 kg SO2/day, 118 kg PO43-/day, and 0.13 kg Sb/day, respectively. Conclusion: According to the constituent processes of each of the subsystems and the results of the evaluation of exhaust emissions subsystems, it can be concluded that in an integrated system of waste management, the energy-generating systems such as anaerobic digestion and incineration should be as the first priority and the traditional subsystems such as landfill should be as the last priority.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T13:01:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c8ae50ba4b54bdf9e2ce99fc80a48ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-2029
2008-3718
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-17T13:01:04Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series سلامت و محیط
spelling doaj.art-3c8ae50ba4b54bdf9e2ce99fc80a48ec2022-12-21T21:47:22ZfasTehran University of Medical Sciencesسلامت و محیط2008-20292008-37182016-09-0192273288Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)S Nasrollahi-Sarvaghaji0R Alimardani1M Sharifi2MR Taghizadeh Yazdi3 MSc Graduated, Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Professor, Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Background and Objectives: The continuous increase in solid waste generation worldwide due to population growth and industrialization, calls for management strategies that integrate concerns for environmental sustainability. By quantifying environmental impacts of systems, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool which can contribute to answering that call. The aim of this study was to evaluate environmental pollutants resulting from various treatment options including anaerobic digestion, incineration, and landfill of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) generated daily in Tehran. Materials and Methods: First, the physical properties of the waste and consumption of inputs in the study area were determined from September to October, 2014- 2015. Then the different steps of LCA in relation to each of the subsystems were followed (with SimaPro software). Finally, the results based on the CML Baseline 2000 were presented and analyzed. Results: It was found that when the higher rate of separation and processing in any subsystems increases, the emission of environmental pollutants decreases, so that the global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, and abiotic depletion as the most important impact categories in the subsystems of anaerobic digestion were obtained as -125935 kg CO2/day, -449 kg SO2/day, -1690 kg PO43-/day and -0.43 kg Sb/day, respectively and in incineration were obtained as -264872 kg CO2/day, -974 kg SO2/day, -3471 kg PO43-/day and -0.76 kg Sb/day, respectively, while in the landfill subsystem, they were estimated to be 74478 kg CO2/day, 362 kg SO2/day, 118 kg PO43-/day, and 0.13 kg Sb/day, respectively. Conclusion: According to the constituent processes of each of the subsystems and the results of the evaluation of exhaust emissions subsystems, it can be concluded that in an integrated system of waste management, the energy-generating systems such as anaerobic digestion and incineration should be as the first priority and the traditional subsystems such as landfill should be as the last priority.http://ijhe.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-866-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1Urban waste management SimaPro software Life cycle assessment
spellingShingle S Nasrollahi-Sarvaghaji
R Alimardani
M Sharifi
MR Taghizadeh Yazdi
Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)
سلامت و محیط
Urban waste management
SimaPro software
Life cycle assessment
title Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)
title_full Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)
title_fullStr Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)
title_short Comparison of the Environmental Impacts of Different Municipal Solid Waste Treatments using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) (Case Study: Tehran)
title_sort comparison of the environmental impacts of different municipal solid waste treatments using life cycle assessment lca case study tehran
topic Urban waste management
SimaPro software
Life cycle assessment
url http://ijhe.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-866-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT snasrollahisarvaghaji comparisonoftheenvironmentalimpactsofdifferentmunicipalsolidwastetreatmentsusinglifecycleassessmentlcacasestudytehran
AT ralimardani comparisonoftheenvironmentalimpactsofdifferentmunicipalsolidwastetreatmentsusinglifecycleassessmentlcacasestudytehran
AT msharifi comparisonoftheenvironmentalimpactsofdifferentmunicipalsolidwastetreatmentsusinglifecycleassessmentlcacasestudytehran
AT mrtaghizadehyazdi comparisonoftheenvironmentalimpactsofdifferentmunicipalsolidwastetreatmentsusinglifecycleassessmentlcacasestudytehran