Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment Results

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and is usually diagnosed in advanced stages. Despite many available data, no treatment results have been reviewed in Poland. This study enrolled 289 first-time patients treated between 2018 and 2021 by the Department of Oncology of the P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonja Millert-Kalińska, Marcin Przybylski, Dominik Pruski, Małgorzata Stawicka-Niełacna, Radosław Mądry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/14/2043
_version_ 1797589096268300288
author Sonja Millert-Kalińska
Marcin Przybylski
Dominik Pruski
Małgorzata Stawicka-Niełacna
Radosław Mądry
author_facet Sonja Millert-Kalińska
Marcin Przybylski
Dominik Pruski
Małgorzata Stawicka-Niełacna
Radosław Mądry
author_sort Sonja Millert-Kalińska
collection DOAJ
description Ovarian cancer (OC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and is usually diagnosed in advanced stages. Despite many available data, no treatment results have been reviewed in Poland. This study enrolled 289 first-time patients treated between 2018 and 2021 by the Department of Oncology of the Poznań University of Medical Sciences (SKPP). The relationships among starting treatment in our centre, the type of first intervention, and the final decision were significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients in the SKPP group were more likely to primarily have a laparoscopy and less likely to have an exploratory laparotomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) after a laparotomy was less often a final decision among SKPP patients (9% vs. 22%), in contrary to NACT after a laparoscopy (23% vs. 4%). Factors affecting the shortening of progression-free survival (PFS) were an advanced stage of the disease, a histopathological diagnosis, the type of cytoreduction, and the final decision. Significance according to the final decision was revealed for PDS vs. NACT after a laparotomy (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and for PDS vs. NACT after a laparoscopy (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Our study supports the benefits of treating ovarian cancer in an oncology centre with a high patient throughput. Further observations might also answer the question about overall survival (OS).
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:01:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c91488c9ed64dc29172a768efe4fd66
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9032
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:01:28Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-3c91488c9ed64dc29172a768efe4fd662023-11-18T19:33:09ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322023-07-011114204310.3390/healthcare11142043Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment ResultsSonja Millert-Kalińska0Marcin Przybylski1Dominik Pruski2Małgorzata Stawicka-Niełacna3Radosław Mądry4Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Public Hospital in Poznan, 60-479 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Public Hospital in Poznan, 60-479 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, 65-046 Zielona Góra, PolandDepartment of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-569 Poznań, PolandOvarian cancer (OC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and is usually diagnosed in advanced stages. Despite many available data, no treatment results have been reviewed in Poland. This study enrolled 289 first-time patients treated between 2018 and 2021 by the Department of Oncology of the Poznań University of Medical Sciences (SKPP). The relationships among starting treatment in our centre, the type of first intervention, and the final decision were significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients in the SKPP group were more likely to primarily have a laparoscopy and less likely to have an exploratory laparotomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) after a laparotomy was less often a final decision among SKPP patients (9% vs. 22%), in contrary to NACT after a laparoscopy (23% vs. 4%). Factors affecting the shortening of progression-free survival (PFS) were an advanced stage of the disease, a histopathological diagnosis, the type of cytoreduction, and the final decision. Significance according to the final decision was revealed for PDS vs. NACT after a laparotomy (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and for PDS vs. NACT after a laparoscopy (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Our study supports the benefits of treating ovarian cancer in an oncology centre with a high patient throughput. Further observations might also answer the question about overall survival (OS).https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/14/2043epithelial ovarian cancerEOCdisparities in treatmentlaparoscopy in oncologycytoreduction
spellingShingle Sonja Millert-Kalińska
Marcin Przybylski
Dominik Pruski
Małgorzata Stawicka-Niełacna
Radosław Mądry
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment Results
Healthcare
epithelial ovarian cancer
EOC
disparities in treatment
laparoscopy in oncology
cytoreduction
title Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment Results
title_full Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment Results
title_fullStr Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment Results
title_full_unstemmed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment Results
title_short Epithelial Ovarian Cancer—Varied Treatment Results
title_sort epithelial ovarian cancer varied treatment results
topic epithelial ovarian cancer
EOC
disparities in treatment
laparoscopy in oncology
cytoreduction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/14/2043
work_keys_str_mv AT sonjamillertkalinska epithelialovariancancervariedtreatmentresults
AT marcinprzybylski epithelialovariancancervariedtreatmentresults
AT dominikpruski epithelialovariancancervariedtreatmentresults
AT małgorzatastawickaniełacna epithelialovariancancervariedtreatmentresults
AT radosławmadry epithelialovariancancervariedtreatmentresults