Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din România
<p>The article examines the available remedies concerning the excessive length of proceedings in the Romanian law, in relation to the recommendations of Council of Europe bodies. Available remedies should be classified as: a) preventive measures, known also as ante-factum remedies, such as jud...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ron |
| Published: |
Babes-Bolyai University
2010-06-01
|
| Series: | Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/96 |
| _version_ | 1826580717392363520 |
|---|---|
| author | Ion GÂLEA Raluca GÂLEA |
| author_facet | Ion GÂLEA Raluca GÂLEA |
| author_sort | Ion GÂLEA |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The article examines the available remedies concerning the excessive length of proceedings in the Romanian law, in relation to the recommendations of Council of Europe bodies. Available remedies should be classified as: a) preventive measures, known also as ante-factum remedies, such as judicial policy measures meant to avoid procedural delays, and b) postfactum measures, available for the parties, when procedural delays have already occurred. With respect to the ante-factum measures, although the Romanian law provides for some measures (such as taking evidence through attorneys-at-law and mediation), it appears necessary that these measures should be integrated in a unitary policy, in order to approach all aspects of the procedural delay phenomenon. Concerning the post-factum remedies, the European Court for Human Rights and the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) recommended the states to include in their legislation a special acceleratory remedy, by which the parties should be able to ask for the finalization of the procedure within a predictable time-line. As such a remedy is not available in Romania new legislation would be needed in order to introduce this procedural mean, in parallel with an action for damages.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:15:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3c9987152c59430f8aab544ce48a557f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1454-1378 |
| language | ron |
| last_indexed | 2025-03-14T14:38:37Z |
| publishDate | 2010-06-01 |
| publisher | Babes-Bolyai University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative |
| spelling | doaj.art-3c9987152c59430f8aab544ce48a557f2025-02-26T06:45:31ZronBabes-Bolyai UniversityRevista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative1454-13782010-06-011225305196Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din RomâniaIon GÂLEA0Raluca GÂLEA1Asist. univ. dr., Universitatea din Bucureşti, Facultatea de Drept, Director al Direcţiei Drept Comunitar, Ministerul Afacerilor Externe, Bucureşti, RomâniaJudecător, Director al Direcţiei Integrare Europeană, Relaţii Internaţionale şi Programe din Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii, Bucureşti, România<p>The article examines the available remedies concerning the excessive length of proceedings in the Romanian law, in relation to the recommendations of Council of Europe bodies. Available remedies should be classified as: a) preventive measures, known also as ante-factum remedies, such as judicial policy measures meant to avoid procedural delays, and b) postfactum measures, available for the parties, when procedural delays have already occurred. With respect to the ante-factum measures, although the Romanian law provides for some measures (such as taking evidence through attorneys-at-law and mediation), it appears necessary that these measures should be integrated in a unitary policy, in order to approach all aspects of the procedural delay phenomenon. Concerning the post-factum remedies, the European Court for Human Rights and the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) recommended the states to include in their legislation a special acceleratory remedy, by which the parties should be able to ask for the finalization of the procedure within a predictable time-line. As such a remedy is not available in Romania new legislation would be needed in order to introduce this procedural mean, in parallel with an action for damages.</p>https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/96remedieslenght of procedureseuropean convention for human rightsfair trialreasonable delay. |
| spellingShingle | Ion GÂLEA Raluca GÂLEA Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din România Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative remedies lenght of procedures european convention for human rights fair trial reasonable delay. |
| title | Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din România |
| title_full | Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din România |
| title_fullStr | Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din România |
| title_full_unstemmed | Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din România |
| title_short | Remedii privind durata procedurilor în procesul civil din România |
| title_sort | remedii privind durata procedurilor in procesul civil din romania |
| topic | remedies lenght of procedures european convention for human rights fair trial reasonable delay. |
| url | https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/96 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT iongalea remediiprivinddurataprocedurilorinprocesulcivildinromania AT ralucagalea remediiprivinddurataprocedurilorinprocesulcivildinromania |